Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

496 P.R.C. v. D.G. -- rank: 414

... obtained a TRO based on the predicate acts of harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, and terroristic threats, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 ... 2011) ("[T]exting was not harassment within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 because the trial court did not find, and the evidence ...

docket:	a6331-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22007

497 MIA A. KEBEA v. JOHN S. DAVID -- rank: 414

... failed to establish an act of harassment in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. Our reading of the trial transcript, including the judge's ... had violated on August 2-3, 2008. The harassment statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, states in relevant part: [A] person commits a petty disorderly ... must consider whether David's conduct violates the terms of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 by defendant David. The court shall conduct whatever proceedings it ...

docket:	a0807-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55421

498 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0248-20.opn.html -- rank: 414

... finding that his conduct constituted harassment within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. We agree and reverse. In a domestic violence case, we ... the predicate act of harassment occurred. Harassment is defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:33- 4, which provides in relevant part, that [A] person commits a ... or ' alarming conduct . . . with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy.' N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a), (c). There must be proof that a defendant's ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15105

499 B.A.R.S v. S.R.L. -- rank: 412

... Assault, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1, and harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, are among the predicate acts listed in N.J.S ... with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person.' N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a) to (c). A person commits assault 'if the person ...

docket:	a1856-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20336

500 N.B v. M.C -- rank: 412

... driveway, apparently sufficient to support a finding of harassment under N.J.S.A. 2C:33- 4(b). The judge found plaintiff sincere that she feared defendant ... to do so,' if done 'with purpose to harass another.' N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(b); see D.N. v. K.M., 429 N.J ...

docket:	a1097-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19326

501 D.C v. J.E.C -- rank: 412

... J.S.A. 2C:12-3 or harassment contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. She represented that there was no prior history of domestic ...

docket:	a3080-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51236

502 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0216-19.opn.html -- rank: 412

... defendant committed two specific predicate acts of domestic violence: harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, and A-0216-19 8 criminal mischief, N.J.S ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26354

503 I.U. v. M.U -- rank: 412

... part judge found defendant committed the predicate act of harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, and the FRO was necessary to protect plaintiff against future ... with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a) to (c).] Harassment requires the defendant to act with ...

docket:	a4686-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16450

504 L.Z. v. K.Q. -- rank: 412

... J.S.A. 2C:25-19(a), which incorporates harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, as conduct constituting domestic violence. See id. at 125-26 ... with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.] Proof of a purpose to harass is an essential element of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. See L.D. v. W.D. , 327 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a4776-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31638

505 C.H v. R.J.O -- rank: 412

... this appeal, the predicate act of harassment is defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a) and (c), as when a person 'with purpose to ...

docket:	a1058-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24721

506 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DEXTER COHEN -- rank: 412

... of the lesser-included offense of petty disorderly persons harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (count one), and two counts of third-degree terroristic threats ...

docket:	a1200-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55645

507 M.C v. C.D -- rank: 412

... determined plaintiff established defendant committed an act of harassment under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) by his actions in destroying plaintiff's property. The ...

docket:	a1094-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21008

508 JOYCE BODNAR v. PERRY SPERENDI -- rank: 412

... The trial judge made the requisite finding as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. See State v. Hoffman , 149 N.J. 564 , 577 (1997 ... the conduct encompassed by subsection a of the harassment statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. In so doing, the Court distinguished the conduct sought to ... 580-81. The Court noted that generally the harassment statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, is designed "to make criminal, private annoyances that are not ...

docket:	A2833-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33550

509 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2858-15.opn.html -- rank: 412

... charging him with the petty disorderly persons offense of harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(b). The State charged that defendant touched the leg of ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16187

510 L.K.O v. B.O -- rank: 412

... not rise to the level of harassment as defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. The Domestic Violence Act is intended to extend to the ...

docket:	a2504-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30377