Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97")   1 to 3 of 3 results. Run time: 0.845 seconds | Search time: 0.839 seconds    
1 STATEOF NEW JERSEY v. KEF W. CARIAS - -- rank: 1000
... 3.1; a $30 monthly fee for sex offender supervision, N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97; a $30 penalty for the Law Enforcement Officers Training and ... Erred in Imposing a $30 Per Month Penalty, Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97, Because It Did Not Determine [Defendant's] Income and Because ... monthly penalty for the supervision of sex offenders pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97(a). The statute states that this penalty shall be imposed ... offender supervisory 18 A-0816-16T4 fee imposed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97 and the $1000 SCVTF penalty imposed pursuant to N.J ...
docket: a0816-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-02-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62235
2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSE V. JIMENEZ -- rank: 940
... JIMENEZ WITH A MONTHLY PAROLE FEE AUTHORIZED BY A STATUTE, N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97, THAT BECAME EFFECTIVE ONLY AFTER JIMENEZ HAD ALREADY BEEN CONVICTED ... As for the parole supervision fee under the newly enacted N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97, defendant and the State both argue that the fee is ... it contemplates a "penalty" and flows from a criminal conviction. N.J.S.A.  30:4-123.97. Therefore, retroactive imposition of N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97 violates the ex post facto clauses of the federal and ...
docket: a1061-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-12-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41957
3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERALD B. WILSON -- rank: 906
... ex post facto law because the law establishing this penalty, N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97, was not effective until July 1, A-0434-17T4 34 ... does not exceed 149 percent of the federal poverty level.' N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97. At sentencing, the judge correctly found that the SOSF penalty ... that a $30 per month SOSF penalty was imposed under N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.97. We reverse and on remand, direct the sentencing judge to ...
docket: a0434-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-01-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 59430

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!