Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1066 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.R. and M.L.R IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.R Minor -- rank: 472

... PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. A. DYFS Failed To Prove By Clear And convincing Evidence ...

docket:	a4941-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40885

1067 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.R.S. -- rank: 472

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...

docket:	a4230-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	112619

1068 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.S. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.S., O.S., AND A.S Minors -- rank: 472

... third, and fourth prongs of the statutory test found in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. M ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The [] criteria enumerated in the best interests standard are ... delay in permanent placement will only add to the harm. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Consideration of this prong can include determining whether ... 161 N.J. at 354. "Reasonable efforts" are defined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c) as including but not limited to: (1) consulting and ... not as strong, that evidence will satisfy the requirement of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4) . . . ." Id. at 363. "Inherent in the fourth factor ...

docket:	a1534-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46500

1069 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.D.M and T.D IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF S.S.M., a minor -- rank: 472

... termination case, as articulated in A.W. and codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The statute authorizes a court to terminate parental rights ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four statutory criteria are "not discrete and separate ...

docket:	a0266-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43922

1070 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2391-21.opn.html -- rank: 472

... determined by the application of the parental termination standard under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which provides: (1) The child's safety, health, or ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	43627

1071 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.R. and M.L.R IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.R Minor -- rank: 472

... PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. A. DYFS Failed To Prove By Clear And convincing Evidence ...

docket:	a4988-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40885

1072 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.W. -- rank: 472

... that all four prongs of the best interests test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), were satisfied by clear and convincing evidence. This appeal ... that the Division satisfied each of the four factors of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We first address H.W.'s contention that, because ... finding that she "harmed" the child within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). This argument lacks merit. As we specifically stated ... the first prong of the statutory test for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). In re Guardianship of DMH , 161 N.J ...

docket:	a6050-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25745

1073 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.R. -- rank: 472

... Child Protection and Permanency (Division) proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree, and affirm ... trial, made detailed factual findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and thereafter concluded the Division met by clear and ... guardianship. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a2995-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12166

1074 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.S. -- rank: 472

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] D.Y.F.S. must prove each of the ... disruption of her bond with foster parents, this will satisfy N.J.S.A . 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)." Id. at 363. "[T] he two components of the harm requirement, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) and (2) are related to one another, and ...

docket:	A0755-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57892

1075 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.W. -- rank: 472

... of the four prongs of the best interests test. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] Defendant challenges each of these findings. Yet, our scope ... and enduring emotional or psychological harm to the child[ren].' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Further, defendant had no realistic plan or ability ...

docket:	a4378-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25791

1076 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.J. -- rank: 472

... Protection and Permanency ("Division") failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); and (2) termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a2992-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22122

1077 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.W., Sr -- rank: 472

... the required statutory factors by clear and convincing evidence. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian supports the termination. After reviewing the ... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and convincing evidence. On appeal, defendant presents ...

docket:	a4430-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12716

1078 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.M. and E.C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF D.C a Minor -- rank: 470

... prongs of the best interests of the child test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Moreover, Eric contends the matter should have been dismissed ... only add the following comments. Under the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the first two prongs require clear and convincing proof ...

docket:	a0035-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40406

1079 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.B.S. -- rank: 470

... the trial court as to prongs one and two of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) and (2), but remanded for further proceedings as to prongs three and four, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3) and (4), in light of Ivan's February ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The court must determine "whether a child's ...

docket:	a1323-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22848

1080 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.B. and T.A IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.A., T.J., and M.B Minors -- rank: 470

... finding that the Division had proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 by clear and convincing evidence. The court found the Division ...

docket:	a4994-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-16
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	42151