Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1516 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.G. and R.H. -- rank: 375

... interests of the child" standard. Ibid. That standard, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), provides that parental rights may be terminated when: (1 ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4).] These four prongs "are not discrete and ...

docket:	a1248-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28126

1517 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.B. -- rank: 375

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These criteria "are not discrete and separate; they relate ...

docket:	a5289-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	25142

1518 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.B -- rank: 375

... review the four prongs of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1: (1) The child's safety, health, or development has been ...

docket:	a5878-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	26271

1519 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0686-16a0687-16.opn.html -- rank: 375

... prong of the best interests of the child standard under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We conclude the suspension was in the best interests ... judgment of guardianship. His opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with In re Guardianship of 3 A-0686 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	21879

1520 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. W.F. -- rank: 375

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four requirements are neither discrete nor separate. "[T ...

docket:	a4278-07
court:
decided:	2009-05-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52608

1521 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a5878-11.opn.html -- rank: 375

... review the four prongs of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1: (1) The child's safety, health, or development has been ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25159

1522 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.C.R. and D.J.N. -- rank: 375

... of the best interests of the child standard required by N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The judge entered a conforming order on March l ...

docket:	a3814-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13119

1523 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.E. -- rank: 375

... by clear and convincing evidence the four factors specified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. We disagree. Our careful review of the record establishes that ... App. Div. 2001), certif. denied , 171 N.J. 44 (2002). N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 provides that once it appears that termination of parental rights ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The four criteria enumerated in the best interests standard ...

docket:	A2550-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-09-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53650

1524 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.H. -- rank: 375

... placement." After making credibility findings and applying the statutory factors, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), to the facts adduced at trial in a thorough ...

docket:	a2504-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15655

1525 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.G. -- rank: 373

... and, in evaluating the criteria for terminating parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, the court concluded: There's nothing to indicate that [defendant ... ONE THE DIVISION FAILED TO PROVE ALL FOUR PRONGS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AND FAILED TO PROVE THAT ...

docket:	a0546-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37932

1526 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.B. -- rank: 373

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...

docket:	A1799-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51968

1527 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. W.G. -- rank: 373

... general findings before addressing the four-part statutory test of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a): [D.N.G.] was born November 22nd, 2000. [D ...

docket:	a4721-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40863

1528 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.S. -- rank: 373

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four criteria overlap one another in order to ...

docket:	a4537-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-13
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	50411

1529 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. W.F.W. -- rank: 373

... 103 N.J. 591, 604-11 (1986) and codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). That test requires proof that: (1) The child's ... evaluating the record in light of the fourth prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the judge found that because of the stronger bonds ...

docket:	a3104-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-12-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47781

1530 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. L.L. -- rank: 373

... found that the Division had proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The court summarized its ... four statutory factors necessary to terminate her parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We do not agree ...

docket:	a0081-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19521