Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1531 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.L and J.W., and N.F -- rank: 373

... the child standard necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The 1 We use initials and fictious names to ...

docket:	a1914-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12601

1532 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. A.M. -- rank: 373

... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), which, in the best interest of the children, mandates ... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a2449-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19295

1533 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.L. and L.N -- rank: 373

... prongs of the best interests of the child standard under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). 1 We use initials and fictitious names to protect ...

docket:	a4164-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23382

1534 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.O. -- rank: 373

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-11 (1986), now codified in N.J.S.A . 30:4C-15.1. The statute provides: a. The division shall initiate a petition ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The four statutory criteria "are not discrete and separate ...

docket:	A2182-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50025

1535 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. W.F.W. -- rank: 373

... 103 N.J. 591, 604-11 (1986) and codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). That test requires proof that: (1) The child's ... evaluating the record in light of the fourth prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the judge found that because of the stronger bonds ...

docket:	a3098-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-12-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47780

1536 NEW JEREY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.W., JR -- rank: 373

... as do we. The "best interests" standard is codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and requires the State to establish the following four ...

docket:	a3004-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12730

1537 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. P.T. -- rank: 371

... the best interests of the child standard." Ibid. (citations omitted). N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 codified the standards the Supreme Court established in New Jersey ...

docket:	a4484-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	43015

1538 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. P.T. -- rank: 371

... the best interests of the child standard." Ibid. (citations omitted). N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 codified the standards the Supreme Court established in New Jersey ...

docket:	a4483-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	43015

1539 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. F.S. -- rank: 371

... the trial, made factual findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and thereafter concluded the Division met by clear and ... father. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a2037-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13746

1540 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.B. -- rank: 371

... credible evidence and meets the four-prong statutory test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, we affirm. I. K.B. is twenty-nine years old ... and development were or will be endangered by K.B. N.J.S.A . 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). The harm must be of a nature that ...

docket:	A0817-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41253

1541 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.S.R. -- rank: 368

... through three of the best interests of the child test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. C ...

docket:	a3023-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9646

1542 IN THE MATTER GUARDIANSHIP OF NADIA JORDAN et al. -- rank: 368

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good.         [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1.]     The judge determined that testimony failed to reveal allegations of ...

docket:	A1125-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-01-17
status:	published
citation:	336 N.J. Super. 270
Document Size:	17077

1543 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.W. -- rank: 368

... THE FOUR PRONGS OF THE "BEST INTEREST" STANDARD CODIFIED IN N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE. A. THERE IS NO CLEAR ...

docket:	a0722-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17194

1544 .A-0 OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. A.C. and D.P.-C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF J.W.C. and J.D.C Minors -- rank: 368

... It is from that order that they both now appeal. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division to petition the termination of parental ...

docket:	a3233-14
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-12
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16044

1545 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.G and K.A.G. -- rank: 366

... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... clear and convincing evidence, all four statutory prongs outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In her thoughtful opinion, Judge DeCastro concluded that termination ...

docket:	a2956-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9186