Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1576 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.S. -- rank: 357

... that all four factors of the best interests test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), were satisfied by clear and convincing evidence. This appeal ... that the Division satisfied each of the four factors of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The judge recounted C.S.'s ongoing and persistent ...

docket:	a6340-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17451

1577 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.C. -- rank: 357

... evidence, all four of the necessary prongs for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). 2 Among other things, Judge Rahill concluded that Annie ...

docket:	a5306-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16687

1578 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3822-19.opn.html -- rank: 357

... established all four prongs required to terminate parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) through (4). In this appeal, Dana attacks the ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11711

1579 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5214-17.opn.html -- rank: 355

... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. C.J. asserts that ... clear and convincing evidence, all four statutory prongs outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In her thoughtful opinion, Judge Murray concluded that termination ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	10318

1580 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3635-18.opn.html -- rank: 355

... established all four prongs required to terminate parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) through (4); see also In re Guardianship of ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	9680

1581 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.J. -- rank: 355

... of his parental rights under the statutory criteria outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. We reject this argument and affirm. Because the case against ...

docket:	a3462-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-02-11
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	29276

1582 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.S. and D.R. -- rank: 355

... weight to establish the four-pronged test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We reject his arguments and affirm substantially for the ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] Briefly, as for the first prong, the judge found ...

docket:	a2380-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17185

1583 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.C. -- rank: 355

... judgment of guardianship. His opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O ...

docket:	a4118-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22628

1584 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.G IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.J.O. AND A.C.O Minors -- rank: 355

... that the Division had satisfied the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, by clear and convincing evidence. Judge Donaldson followed up with ... them, those factors were properly evaluated and applied. Factor three, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3), requires the Division to demonstrate that it made ...

docket:	a0436-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18785

1585 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.H. -- rank: 355

... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a5307-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12548

1586 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. I.H.C. -- rank: 352

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a5779-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21289

1587 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.D.E. -- rank: 352

... satisfying each of the four prongs of the statutory test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), proving guardianship was in the best interest of the ... specifically established the discrete, yet overlapping, prongs set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and convincing evidence, is solidly grounded on ...

docket:	a5331-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15565

1588 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.S-N -- rank: 352

... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a5732-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14004

1589 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. D.J.C. -- rank: 350

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The trial judge's findings of fact are afforded ...

docket:	a5865-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-24
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30628

1590 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.Z., JR. -- rank: 350

... BECAUSE SHE ABUSED AND NEGLECTED THEM WITHIN THE MEANING OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15 1(a) DYFS and the Law Guardian contend that we lack ...

docket:	a6658-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-07-11
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	45249