Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

706 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.W. -- rank: 533

... order entered after trial terminating his parental rights pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Jerrel was born on August 31, 2010 to Mathias ... that the Division failed to prove the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence and the performance of ... and convincing evidence. His opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... that the Division failed to prove the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. Defendant's second point ...

docket:	a1870-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20114

707 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.C. and M.W IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF T.C and M.C -- rank: 533

... trial to satisfy the best-interests standard, set forth at N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Despite receiving many DYFS-provided services over numerous years ... because DYFS did not prove the required statutory elements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. Specifically, C.C. contends ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ...

docket:	a1572-10
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	54641

708 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.C. -- rank: 533

... child, who did not have a safe, permanent home, satisfying N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1), (2). Judge Axelrad detailed the drug abuse treatment ... began in 2009, long before this child's birth, satisfying N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). Despite a myriad of treatment programs, her chronic ... severing the relationship will not cause severe and enduring harm. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). "A child is not chattel in which a ... parental rights was in T.L.M.'s best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Affirmed. This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:	a3614-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14931

709 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.M and J.B -- rank: 533

... all four prongs of the best interests test, codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). He found because of J.B.'s chronic criminality ... THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT EACH PRONG OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) HAD BEEN SATISFIED IN THIS CASE, AND THE TERMINATION ... 103 N.J. 591, 604-11 (1986), and codified as N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which states: The division shall initiate a petition to ...

docket:	a4865-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22240

710 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.M. -- rank: 533

... four prongs on the statutory best interests test contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We discuss those in greater detail below. The judge ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at 352 (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). The inquiry is "whether that parent can raise ... made "reasonable efforts to reunite [defendant] with [A.Q.M.]." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c) defines "reasonable efforts," which consist of actions by the ...

docket:	a5637-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43265

711 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.R. -- rank: 531

... Division had satisfied each of the prongs set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. A judgment of guardianship was entered the same date. This appeal followed. 3 N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division to petition for the termination of ...

docket:	a3356-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23119

712 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.P. -- rank: 531

... the child, courts follow a four prong standard, codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). This standard allows for termination when the State proves ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The four criteria enumerated in the best interests standard ... 161 N.J. at 354. "Reasonable efforts," as defined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c), include but are not limited to: 1) consulting and ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The question under this prong is "whether, after ... not as strong, that evidence will satisfy the requirement of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4)." Id. at 363. "Inherent in the fourth factor ...

docket:	a3337-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60641

713 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.T -- rank: 531

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-10 (1986), and codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. The determination was memorialized in a judgment of guardianship. This ... Div. 2001) . Specifically, the four-prong test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires DYFS to prove: (1) The child's safety ... circumstances that caused the harm and consider alternatives to termination. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). S.T. does not dispute that DYFS provided ...

docket:	a5165-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46469

714 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2251-11a2253-11.opn.html -- rank: 531

... Division had satisfied all four prongs of the statutory standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, he terminated Olivia's ... the child, courts follow a four-prong standard, codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). This standard allows for termination when the Division proves ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ... unable or unwilling to eliminate the harm facing the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The focus of this inquiry is to determine ... or her circumstances, and to consider alternatives to parental termination. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). A court evaluates on an individual basis the ... will not do more harm than good to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). This prong "serves as a fail-safe ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	53809

715 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.N.M. and L.D IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.L.M -- rank: 531

... make the necessary findings concerning all elements of prong three, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3), and specifically whether kinship legal guardianship (KLG) was ... of the statutory 'best interests of the child' test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... rights must be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency ...

docket:	a2623-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-01
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15159

716 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.N. -- rank: 531

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... N.J. 420 , 447 (2012). The four prongs contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) require a fact-sensitive analysis, and "are neither discrete ... K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at 352 (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)); see also F.M. , supra , 211 N.J ...

docket:	a1844-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29273

717 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.W.M., JR -- rank: 531

... failed to prove two of the four prongs of the N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) "best interests of the child" test by clear and ... evidence. The trial court applied the four factors required under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and found the Division met its burden on all ... O. , 161 N.J. 337 , 347 (1999) (citation omitted). Under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the Division can initiate a petition to terminate parental ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). This standard does not require a showing that ...

docket:	a2106-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23653

718 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. F.C.-G. -- rank: 531

... the statutory best-interests-of-the-child test, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Division and Jamie's Law Guardian argue otherwise ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at 352 (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). See also F.M. , supra , 211 N.J ...

docket:	a0088-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33596

719 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.T. -- rank: 531

... Division) failed to prove the second and fourth prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... R. 1:38-3(d)(12). A-3876-17T2 2 N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to petition for termination of parental ... at trial, made detailed findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and concluded the Division met, by clear and convincing ... s analysis of the facts tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and comports with applicable case law. See, e.g ...

docket:	a3876-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55753

720 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. O.F.A. -- rank: 531

... Division had satisfied all four prongs of the statutory standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, he terminated Olivia's ... the child, courts follow a four-prong standard, codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). This standard allows for termination when the Division proves ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ... unable or unwilling to eliminate the harm facing the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The focus of this inquiry is to determine ... or her circumstances, and to consider alternatives to parental termination. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). A court evaluates on an individual basis the ... will not do more harm than good to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). This prong "serves as a fail-safe ...

docket:	a2253-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53465