Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1")   811 to 825 of 1747 results. Run time: 0.831 seconds | Search time: 0.824 seconds    
 Page:1 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 117 Previous 15 Next 15
811 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.B.S. -- rank: 515
... rights after a guardianship trial adjudicating the four criteria of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial ... findings as to prongs one and two of the statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) and (2), with respect to both parents, but ... remand for further proceedings as to prongs three and four, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3) and (4). We do so in light of ... had been established by clear and convincing evidence, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The judge agreed with the Division, joined by the ... terminations of her parental rights concerning her older children. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(d). In any event, the record shows that the Division ...
docket: a4845-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-10-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22232
812 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.A. -- rank: 515
... Division failed to prove prongs two and four prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence as required to terminate ... the statutory test for the termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). On appeal, L.A. first contends that the trial ... with clear and convincing evidence prongs two and four of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Appellate review of a trial court order terminating parental ... only be granted if the following four prongs enumerated in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) are established by clear and convincing evidence: (1) The ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] A-4776-16T1 8 'The four criteria enumerated in ...
docket: a4776-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-01-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22387
813 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.M. -- rank: 515
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... are evaluated by application of the four standards contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). N.J. Div. of Youth and Family Servs. v ... K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at 352 (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). The inquiry is "whether that parent can raise ... We again disagree that the prong three proofs were insufficient. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c) defines "reasonable efforts," as actions by the Division "to ...
docket: a5682-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 46077
814 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3330-20.opn.html -- rank: 515
... and finding that the Division met all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. Kevin appealed, 4 Lana ... child's best interests. In order to obtain parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division prove by clear and convincing evidence ... the A-3330-20 8 Division proved each element of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We briefly address Kevin ... tainted the rest of its parental rights termination analysis under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) to (4). We are not persuaded. While Kevin ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 21335
815 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. D.R. -- rank: 515
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...
docket: a4267-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-02-28
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 93763
816 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. F.B. -- rank: 515
... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); and (2) termination of defendant's parental rights was ...
docket: a5084-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15629
817 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.V. -- rank: 513
... the best interest of the child standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, and thus that termination of her parental rights to the ... proofs with respect to the second and fourth prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 were inadequate. The Division has not appealed from the order ...
docket: a5086-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-02-15
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 85606
818 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.F and J.N. -- rank: 513
... best interests standard necessary for termination of parental rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Cara also contends that the family court misapplied the ... efforts aimed at preserving family unity under prong three. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(3). A review of the record establishes that all ... harm to the child.' L. 2021, c. 154, ยง 9; N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). 3 The Legislature's findings and declarations appear ...
docket: a2088-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-02-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20378
819 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. A.S -- rank: 513
... DCPP'S EVIDENCE DID NOT SUPPORT THE FOUR PRONGS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(A) TO TERMINATE THE MOTHER'S PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. REVERSAL ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15.1(a).] These four prongs are neither discrete nor separate, but ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The analysis examines the impact of harm caused by ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The issue 'is not whether a biological mother or ...
docket: a0009-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-06-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26798
820 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.M.C and D.J.J, -- rank: 513
... analysis of the four prongs for termination set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the judge terminated the father's rights, issuing both ... When seeking the termination of a parent's rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the Division has the burden of establishing, by clear ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] 'These elements are not discrete and separate; they overlap ...
docket: a1772-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-10-31
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22079
821 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.D and T.S.G. -- rank: 513
... to establish the third prong of the best interests standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(3). The law guardian joins with the Division in ... Division established all four prongs of the best interests standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4), by clear and convincing evidence. As to ...
docket: a1080-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-10-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48449
822 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.F and D.L. -- rank: 513
... and Permanency (Division) failed to prove the fourth prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C- - 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... clear and convincing evidence, all four statutory prongs outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In its thorough decision, the trial court concluded that ... 2007). The trial court's opinions track the requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), and are supported by substantial and credible evidence in ... will not do more harm than good to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). We disagree. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4) 'serves as a fail-safe against termination even ... trial court properly concluded that all of the requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) were satisfied, including prong four of the statutory ...
docket: a1594-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-09-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15262
823 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. B.E and M.M. -- rank: 513
... DYFS had proven the four-prong statutory standard contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. On March 24, 2010 ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... that caused the harm and to consider alternatives to termination. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). "Reasonable efforts" mean: attempts by an agency authorized ... s progress, development and health; and (4) facilitating appropriate visitation. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c).] However, the reasonableness of the services offered depends on ...
docket: a5235-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62113
824 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES,1 v. S.G.C. and R.M.P IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Q.S.C., Q.F.C R.S.P. and Q.S.C., minors -- rank: 513
... following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE ELEMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 WERE NOT PROVEN BY CLEAR AND CONVICING EVIDENCE. (A) R ...
docket: a2949-11
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 74455
825 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. Y.C. -- rank: 513
... proven, by clear and convincing evidence, all four prongs under N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15.1(a), warranting the termination of defendant's parental rights to ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] As the Court has made clear, "[t]he focus ... L. , 191 N.J. 596 , 606-07 (2007)). In applying N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), we must also be conscious of the fact that ...
docket: a0221-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22848
 Page:1 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 117 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!