Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1051 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.L.J. -- rank: 475

... not prove the four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1( a), by clear and convincing evidence. The Division and Jason ... Division had met its burden of proving the elements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence and terminated defendant's ... which led to the child's placement outside the home. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). As a result of his conviction and five ...

docket:	a5884-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19146

1052 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.L.D. AND R.N.D. -- rank: 475

... almost ten years. Judge Donaldson examined the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, also known as the “best interests of the childâ ... 366 , 378 (1995). Termination of parental rights is governed by N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The legislation sets out a four-pronged test that ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4).] The statute demands that the best interests ...

docket:	a3261-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31559

1053 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.W. and D.W IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF J.W., C.W. and W.W Minors -- rank: 475

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ... be considered in order to satisfy the third [prong] of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1." New Jersey Div. of Youth and Family Services v. S ... to J.W. would not do more harm than good, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the ...

docket:	a1954-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52861

1054 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.A.C. and P.E.C., JR IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.G.C. and D.A.C Minors -- rank: 475

... CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE[,] ALL FOUR OF THE ELEMENTS UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(A) REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. P.E ... serious and enduring emotional or psychological harm" to the girls. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The record is also replete with evidence of ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good," N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(4), Judge Figarotta recognized that no matter what he decided ...

docket:	a5535-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26879

1055 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.A.C. and P.E.C., JR IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.G.C. and D.A.C Minors -- rank: 475

... CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE[,] ALL FOUR OF THE ELEMENTS UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(A) REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. P.E ... serious and enduring emotional or psychological harm" to the girls. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The record is also replete with evidence of ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good," N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(4), Judge Figarotta recognized that no matter what he decided ...

docket:	a5024-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26879

1056 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.L.W and H.B. -- rank: 475

... of the statutory standards governing the termination of parental rights, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) to (4), by clear and convincing evidence, thereby ... WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE FOUR PART STATUTORY CRITERIA OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), IT IS APPARENT THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN DETERMINING ... consider defendant's arguments addressed to the statutory factors. Pursuant N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), parental rights may be terminated if DYFS clearly and ... that time clearly endangered the twins' "safety, health [and] development." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). As for the second prong, while defendant did ...

docket:	a5501-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48428

1057 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.M. -- rank: 475

... Protection and Permanency (Division) proved prongs all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree and affirm ... evaluation between Vincent and his uncle. 5 A-3706-16T2 [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] Judge De Castro reviewed the evidence presented at the ... trial, made detailed factual findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), and thereafter concluded the Division met by clear and ... paramount. Judge DeCastro's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a3706-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-04-19
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	22031

1058 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.L.D. AND R.N.D. -- rank: 475

... almost ten years. Judge Donaldson examined the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, also known as the “best interests of the childâ ... 366 , 378 (1995). Termination of parental rights is governed by N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The legislation sets out a four-pronged test that ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4).] The statute demands that the best interests ...

docket:	a3255-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31559

1059 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. B.S. -- rank: 475

... Division had proven all four prongs required for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. On appeal, defendant claims ...

docket:	a4114-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17558

1060 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/1954-14a1955-14.opn.html -- rank: 475

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ... be considered in order to satisfy the third [prong] of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1." New Jersey Div. of Youth and Family Services v. S ... to J.W. would not do more harm than good, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(4), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	42006

1061 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PE -- rank: 475

... rights must be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency ...

docket:	a3725-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17218

1062 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.S. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.S., O.S., AND A.S Minors -- rank: 472

... third, and fourth prongs of the statutory test found in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. M ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The [] criteria enumerated in the best interests standard are ... delay in permanent placement will only add to the harm. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Consideration of this prong can include determining whether ... 161 N.J. at 354. "Reasonable efforts" are defined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c) as including but not limited to: (1) consulting and ... not as strong, that evidence will satisfy the requirement of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4) . . . ." Id. at 363. "Inherent in the fourth factor ...

docket:	a1534-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46500

1063 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.S. -- rank: 472

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] D.Y.F.S. must prove each of the ... disruption of her bond with foster parents, this will satisfy N.J.S.A . 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)." Id. at 363. "[T] he two components of the harm requirement, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) and (2) are related to one another, and ...

docket:	A0755-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57892

1064 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.R. and M.L.R IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.R Minor -- rank: 472

... PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. A. DYFS Failed To Prove By Clear And convincing Evidence ...

docket:	a4988-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40885

1065 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.W. -- rank: 472

... of the four prongs of the best interests test. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] Defendant challenges each of these findings. Yet, our scope ... and enduring emotional or psychological harm to the child[ren].' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Further, defendant had no realistic plan or ability ...

docket:	a4378-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25791