Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1066 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.R. -- rank: 472

... Child Protection and Permanency (Division) proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree, and affirm ... trial, made detailed factual findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and thereafter concluded the Division met by clear and ... guardianship. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a2995-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12166

1067 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.R.S. -- rank: 472

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...

docket:	a4230-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	112619

1068 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.J. -- rank: 472

... Protection and Permanency ("Division") failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); and (2) termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a2992-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22122

1069 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.W. -- rank: 472

... that all four prongs of the best interests test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), were satisfied by clear and convincing evidence. This appeal ... that the Division satisfied each of the four factors of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We first address H.W.'s contention that, because ... finding that she "harmed" the child within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). This argument lacks merit. As we specifically stated ... the first prong of the statutory test for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). In re Guardianship of DMH , 161 N.J ...

docket:	a6050-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25745

1070 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.D.M and T.D IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF S.S.M., a minor -- rank: 472

... termination case, as articulated in A.W. and codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The statute authorizes a court to terminate parental rights ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four statutory criteria are "not discrete and separate ...

docket:	a0266-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43922

1071 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.R.S. -- rank: 472

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...

docket:	a4291-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	112619

1072 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.R. and M.L.R IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.R Minor -- rank: 472

... PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. A. DYFS Failed To Prove By Clear And convincing Evidence ...

docket:	a4941-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40885

1073 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. B.S. -- rank: 472

... Division had satisfied each of the prongs set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division to petition for the termination of ...

docket:	a0016-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24210

1074 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.W., Sr -- rank: 472

... the required statutory factors by clear and convincing evidence. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian supports the termination. After reviewing the ... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and convincing evidence. On appeal, defendant presents ...

docket:	a4430-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12716

1075 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2391-21.opn.html -- rank: 472

... determined by the application of the parental termination standard under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which provides: (1) The child's safety, health, or ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	43627

1076 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.Y. -- rank: 472

... each prong of the best-interests analysis set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge ... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a1796-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27088

1077 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2020-17.opn.html -- rank: 470

... the best-interests-of-the-child standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and concluded the Division sustained its burden of proving ... the following four prongs A-2020-17T3 6 enumerated in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) are established by clear and convincing evidence: (1) The ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] 'The four criteria enumerated in the best interests standard ... J. at 348. '[T]he cornerstone of the inquiry [under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)] is not whether the biological parents are fit but ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15457

1078 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.M. and E.C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF D.C a Minor -- rank: 470

... prongs of the best interests of the child test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Moreover, Eric contends the matter should have been dismissed ... only add the following comments. Under the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), the first two prongs require clear and convincing proof ...

docket:	a0035-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40406

1079 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.B. and T.A IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.A., T.J., and M.B Minors -- rank: 470

... finding that the Division had proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 by clear and convincing evidence. The court found the Division ...

docket:	a4994-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-16
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	42151

1080 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.B.S. -- rank: 470

... the trial court as to prongs one and two of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) and (2), but remanded for further proceedings as to prongs three and four, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3) and (4), in light of Ivan's February ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The court must determine "whether a child's ...

docket:	a1323-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22848