Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1096 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. L.L IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF B.L., M.L., AND N.L Minors -- rank: 466

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-11 (1986), now codified in N.J.S.A . 30:4C-15.1. The statute provides: a. The division shall initiate a petition ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The four statutory criteria "are not discrete and separate ... evidence the requisite statutory prongs for termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15.1(a). Moreover, Judge Telsey's pre-trial management of the ...

docket:	a5693-07
court:
decided:	2009-06-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53285

1097 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2960-20.opn.html -- rank: 466

... clear and convincing evidence each of the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1' were satisfied by the Division. The judge further determined the ... findings regarding the third prong of the best interests tests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). Having reviewed the record, we are satisfied the ... required to make reasonable efforts to provide services to parents. N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(3). Here, the Family Part judge entered multiple orders ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20997

1098 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.A.K. -- rank: 466

... evidence the four-prong standard codified by the Legislature in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). 2 After reviewing the record and applicable legal principles ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] A-3748-17T4 3 the Division in support of ... arguments the Division failed to satisfy the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). After perusing the record, we conclude these arguments are ... Paganelli's cogent opinion fully tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O ...

docket:	a3748-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14814

1099 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. B.D. -- rank: 466

... under the four statutory prongs established by the Legislature in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We discern no legal basis to interfere with the ... Katz applied this evidence to the four statutory prongs in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) to determine whether the Division had met its burden of proof. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) provides that the Division must demonstrate that: (1) The ... child's best interest. Stated differently, the four factors in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) "prescribe[] an integrated multi-element test that must be ...

docket:	a4883-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20690

1100 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.B and E.O.R.F -- rank: 466

... is not Adam's biological father. A-2656-20 2 N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We affirm for the comprehensive reasons stated in the ...

docket:	a2656-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19654

1101 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. A.M. -- rank: 466

... and convincing evidence each of the elements set out in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a): (1) The child's safety, health or development has ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] With respect to the first element, the judge found ...

docket:	a5694-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40218

1102 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. V.M. and B.G. IN THE MATTER OF J.M.G -- rank: 466

... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship[.]" N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. It contends that a reversal or remand of the protective ... itself, does not constitute a harm to the child under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)," even though the Court recognized that drug use ...

docket:	a4627-06
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-16
status:	published
citation:	408 N.J. Super. 222 974 A.2d 448
Document Size:	120145

1103 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.M. -- rank: 466

... and convincing evidence the four-prong standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).3 We affirm as to both defendants. We will ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] A-2413-16T2 3 Judge Richard M. Freid’s ... Judge Freid made detailed findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and determined the Division met by clear and convincing ... defendants. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a2413-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15167

1104 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PE -- rank: 463

... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); and (2) termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a2968-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17718

1105 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.G. and J.T. -- rank: 463

... J. Super. 270 , 273-74 (App. Div. 2001). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), when petitioning to terminate parental rights under the "best ... do more harm than good, thus satisfying the fourth prong, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The trial court concluded that the Division had ...

docket:	a4663-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-06-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	54463

1106 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.R. -- rank: 463

... met its statutory burden by clear and convincing evidence. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We add some brief comments in response to the ... Guardianship of J.C. , 129 N.J. 1 , 10 (1992). N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division prove by clear and convincing ...

docket:	a4441-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27451

1107 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.G., -- rank: 463

... by the four-prong "best interests" test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), see also A.W. , supra , 103 N.J. at ...

docket:	a6413-01
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-09-25
status:	published
citation:	354 N.J. Super. 202
Document Size:	25194

1108 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.V. -- rank: 463

... and development has been endangered by the parental relationship. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). He found the Division proved the second prong ... the parent was unable or unwilling to eliminate the harm, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(2), based on the testimony of the Division's ... leading to the children's removal under the third prong, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3), although Dr. Mack opined there were no services ... fourth prong, that termination not do more harm than good, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4), the judge relied on the bonding evaluations conducted ...

docket:	a3769-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22539

1109 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.K.S.J., SR., -- rank: 463

... which she found that DCPP established all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1 by clear and convincing evidence and that termination of Father ... grant a petition when the four prongs set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) are established by clear and convincing evidence. In re ... that identifies a child's best interests.' Id. at 348. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires DCPP to prove: (1) The child's safety ...

docket:	a2071-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23077

1110 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.M. -- rank: 463

... Protection and Permanency ("Division") failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); and (2) termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a5108-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15128