Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1381 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.U.B. -- rank: 409

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a1938-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20870

1382 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.M and S.S -- rank: 409

... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) to (4), and that termination of defendant's ... Division failed to prove prongs two, three and four of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and his daughter should have been placed with his ...

docket:	a4728-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8567

1383 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.V and J.C. -- rank: 409

... the trial judge employed the four-prong test contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which requires that the Division prove by clear and ...

docket:	a3019-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17214

1384 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.U.B. -- rank: 409

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...

docket:	a1942-12xx
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20878

1385 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.A.D IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.J.F.K.D., S.N.D and K.S.M -- rank: 409

... mandated by the best interests of the child test. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Specifically, he argues that the court mistakenly concluded that ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The statute requires that the State demonstrate harm to ...

docket:	a4696-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32467

1386 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.G. -- rank: 409

... convincing evidence all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a1328-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11908

1387 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.D. -- rank: 407

... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. She also argues that ... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a5098-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-11-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14534

1388 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY v. T.C.H. -- rank: 407

... the statutory test for the termination of parental rights, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); she instead focuses on the third and fourth prongs ... rights must be terminated in the child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division of Youth and Family Services ...

docket:	a5682-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26467

1389 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.E.M and A.P., Sr -- rank: 407

... rights should be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a) requires that the Division prove the following four prongs ...

docket:	a1728-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18487

1390 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4218-06remand.opn.html -- rank: 407

... of parental rights "will not do more harm than good." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). Inherent in the fourth prong is a child ... fact and conclusions of law concerning all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) are correct. We are satisfied, as was the trial ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	37259

1391 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF B.M.C. and M.A.C -- rank: 407

... rights must be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division prove by clear and convincing ...

docket:	a4524-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13020

1392 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. A.B. -- rank: 407

... and conclusions of law in accordance with the applicable statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Judge Conte concluded that the four prongs of the ...

docket:	a3526-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51547

1393 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. A.M.M. -- rank: 407

... concluding the Division established all four prongs set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence to terminate the parental ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)] The "four prongs are not 'discrete and separate,' but ...

docket:	a3533-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40250

1394 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.M.M. -- rank: 407

... each prong of the best interests of the child standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and convincing evidence, and that he was ... judgment of guardianship. Her opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O ...

docket:	a4563-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14073

1395 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.L.L and D.Q.T., S.H.B. and D.R.G., Jr -- rank: 407

... two, three and four of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(1) to (4) by clear and convincing evidence. The ...

docket:	a3569-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-12
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60637