Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4c-15.1")   1396 to 1410 of 1746 results. Run time: 0.705 seconds | Search time: 0.698 seconds    
 Page:1 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 117 Previous 15 Next 15
1396 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. A.B. -- rank: 407
... and conclusions of law in accordance with the applicable statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Judge Conte concluded that the four prongs of the ...
docket: a3603-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-03-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51547
1397 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES v. S.C. -- rank: 407
... terminating S.C.'s parental rights. Moreover, we note that N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 contains a strong public policy in favor of permanency. In ...
docket: a3676-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-09-08
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 31569
1398 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.T. -- rank: 407
... G. Baxter terminated Arlen's parental rights. This appeal followed. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division to petition for the termination of ...
docket: a0025-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-03-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27697
1399 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.C., SR. -- rank: 407
... BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE ANY OF THE ELEMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 AT EITHER THE INITIAL TRIAL OR THE REMAND TRIAL. II ... by clear and convincing evidence any of the elements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 and 154 N.J. 394 , 411-12 (1998). Such deference ...
docket: A3994-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-05-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47442
1400 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.R. AND M.U -- rank: 404
... to prove all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), reinstated the Division's complaint for guardianship, held the ... Figurelli found him 'affectionate, patient, caring and or psychological harm, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4), S.R. and M.U., slip op. at ...
docket: a4494-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-02-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 42521
1401 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. K.F. -- rank: 404
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The burden is on the State to show each ...
docket: a4889-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-11-28
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 37780
1402 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.R. -- rank: 404
... Child Protection and Permanency (Division) proved all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree, and affirm ... trial, made detailed factual findings as to each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and thereafter concluded the Division met by clear and ... guardianship. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...
docket: a0804-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14070
1403 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. I.R and THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER OF L.V.R., WHOMSOEVER HE MAY BE -- rank: 404
... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... clear and convincing evidence, all four statutory prongs outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In her thoughtful opinion, Judge DeCastro concluded that termination ...
docket: a2900-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-03-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 9394
1404 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.S and F.D IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF E.P.S -- rank: 404
... so, she reviewed the best interests test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. The judge found that the child's health and development ... judge] found that the Division had proven its case under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 by clear and convincing evidence for the reasons set forth ...
docket: a0547-09
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-06-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 43432
1405 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.C. -- rank: 402
... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...
docket: a5091-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-03-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14000
1406 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.G. -- rank: 402
... four prongs of the best interests standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence.2 On appeal, E ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] A-3872-17T4 3 In essence, E.G. argues ...
docket: a3872-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-01-25
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13910
1407 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.T.B IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF J.M. and M.B minors -- rank: 402
... clear and convincing evidence the four statutory prongs contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). After carefully considering S.B.'s arguments in light ... guardianship. The judge's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), satisfies the standards established by In re Guardianship of ... satisfy the standard for termination of parental rights established by N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). As Judge Blackburn explained in her comprehensive and well ...
docket: a3456-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-02-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15980
1408 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. O.C and T.J.D -- rank: 402
... evidence to establish all four prongs necessary for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The father has not appealed his own termination. We ... the judge's detailed findings on all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In particular, the mother's contention that the Division ...
docket: a2133-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-10-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12484
1409 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. L.A. -- rank: 402
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...
docket: A2720-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-07-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52454
1410 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.S. -- rank: 402
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... removal, and requires the court to consider alternatives to termination. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). "The reasonableness of the Division's efforts depends ...
docket: a5330-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-04-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53484
 Page:1 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 117 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!