Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4c-15.1")   1411 to 1425 of 1746 results. Run time: 0.826 seconds | Search time: 0.820 seconds    
 Page:1 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 117 Previous 15 Next 15
1411 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.H. -- rank: 402
... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The four factors "are not discrete and separate; they ...
docket: a4540-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-02-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48360
1412 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.L. -- rank: 400
... that all four factors of the best interests test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), were satisfied by clear and convincing evidence. As to ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). This prong "serves as a fail-safe against ...
docket: a1223-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-10-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26776
1413 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. P.C. and R.O -- rank: 400
... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendants' parental rights was in ...
docket: a1803-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-06-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 8657
1414 NEW JERSEY OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. O.C. -- rank: 400
... court found that the Division proved all four factors in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and terminated O.C ... the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights[.] [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3).] The specific facts of each case are to ... used as a defense to termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3).'" N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v ...
docket: a5620-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-11
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17169
1415 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.E. and Yu.O.-E IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Y.O.-E a Minor -- rank: 400
... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15-1(a) by clear and convincing 1 We refer to defendants ... of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and (2) termination of defendants' parental rights was in ...
docket: a2851-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-05
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12145
1416 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0821-19.opn.html -- rank: 398
... MET ITS BURDEN AS TO PRONGS ONE AND THREE OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(A) BECAUSE IT FAILED TO [PROVE] THE PATERNAL RELATIONSHIP CAUSED ... proved all four prongs of the best interest test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and terminated both parents' parental rights. A-0821-19T3 ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 10180
1417 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.S. -- rank: 398
... one, two , and four of the statutory best interests test , N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 a . I n N . J . Div. of Youth & Family Servs ...
docket: a6178-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-05-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37194
1418 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. R.S. -- rank: 398
... Family Part's order terminating her parental rights pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We affirm. A.S. was born on July 11 ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] "The four criteria enumerated in the best interests standard ...
docket: a0193-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33307
1419 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.C.L. -- rank: 398
... convincing evidence to support all the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 and terminated S.C.L.'s parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1 mandates that, in order to obtain the termination of parental ...
docket: a6363-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-01-06
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 36024
1420 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.R. -- rank: 398
... the child.  The "best interests" evaluation has been codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and requires the Division prove the following by clear ... opinion. Judge Conte's opinion tracks the statutory elements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and his decision is amply supported by credible evidence ...
docket: a4184-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-12-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16905
1421 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0934-16a0935-16.opn.html -- rank: 398
... in essence, just one element of the requirements imposed by N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)'s four-prong 'best interests' test,' id. at 85 ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 18057
1422 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.D. -- rank: 398
... evidence each of the four prongs as set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. See also In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ...
docket: A0173-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-03-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 58579
1423 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.C. -- rank: 395
... that all four factors of the best interests test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), were satisfied by clear and convincing evidence. 4 As ... WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE FOUR PART STATUTORY CRITERIA OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), IT IS APPARENT THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DETERMINING ...
docket: a1222-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-11-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30752
1424 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2856-15a2857-15resubmit.opn.html -- rank: 395
... before parental rights are terminated in this guardianship case, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(1) to (3), we remanded and retained jurisdiction for ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4); see also N.J. Div. of Youth & Family ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 9407
1425 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4788-16.opn.html -- rank: 395
... concluded the Division had proven all four statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 30:4C:15.1(a), and ordered both parents' rights terminated. The judge found ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 14847
 Page:1 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 117 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!