Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1486 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.D. -- rank: 382

... Protection and Permanency (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports ... 12). Judge Brown's opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and is supported by substantial and credible evidence in ...

docket:	a2988-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10110

1487 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1594-16a1595-16.opn.html -- rank: 382

... had satisfied the four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The judge specifically found the Division made reasonable efforts ... erred in its determination that the Division met its burden N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a)(3), by clear and convincing evidence. Prong Four. Sally ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11769

1488 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PE -- rank: 380

... had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that termination of defendant's parental rights was ...

docket:	a3098-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12754

1489 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.H. -- rank: 380

... of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) failed to satisfy N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which requires the Division prove by clear and convincing ... part and not realistic. The fourth and final prong under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to prove that '[t]ermination of ...

docket:	a2437-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22634

1490 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.B. -- rank: 380

... of the evidence supporting termination of their parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). H.B. and K.T., the fathers of both ...

docket:	A4061-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45719

1491 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.P. -- rank: 380

... standard for termination of parental rights as set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1. On July 17, 2006, Judge Johnson entered a final judgment ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These standards are neither discrete nor separate. They overlap ...

docket:	A0405-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46095

1492 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.B. -- rank: 380

... of the evidence supporting termination of their parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). H.B. and K.T., the fathers of both ...

docket:	A5201-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	44917

1493 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.B. -- rank: 380

... of the evidence supporting termination of their parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). H.B. and K.T., the fathers of both ...

docket:	A4059-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45719

1494 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.M. and C.H -- rank: 380

... by clear and convincing evidence, the statutory factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Defendants argue that without such evidence, the court did ... terminating defendants' parental rights and tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 N ...

docket:	a3830-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12897

1495 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.R. -- rank: 380

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] DYFS bears the burden of proving the statutory criteria ... in defendant's arguments as to the first prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) to warrant additional discussion in a written opinion. R ...

docket:	a1567-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28552

1496 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.M. and C.H. -- rank: 380

... by clear and convincing evidence, the statutory factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Defendants argue that without such evidence, the court did ... terminating defendants' parental rights and tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 N ...

docket:	a2305-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12890

1497 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.F. -- rank: 380

... and well-reasoned oral opinion of Judge James A. Farber. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the ... As a result, the first prong of the analysis under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) was satisfied. During the period of time between defendants ...

docket:	a0034-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21219

1498 NEW protection v. J.M. -- rank: 380

... convincing evidence, the standard for termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). After reviewing the record developed before the Family Part ... 2014. Judge Ragonese correctly applied the four statutory factors in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) as "an integrated multi-element test" to determine that ...

docket:	a2188-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27696

1499 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.A.S. (deceased and A.R.F., Jr -- rank: 380

... rights must be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division prove by clear and convincing ...

docket:	a1270-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-01-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11574

1500 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.F. -- rank: 380

... and well-reasoned oral opinion of Judge James A. Farber. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the ... As a result, the first prong of the analysis under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) was satisfied. During the period of time between defendants ...

docket:	a0035-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21219