1746 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 30:4c-15.1")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4c-15.1") 466 to 480 of 1746 results.	Run time: 0.942 seconds \| Search time: 0.935 seconds
Page:1 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 117 Previous 15 Next 15

466 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.H. -- rank: 576

... prongs of the test for termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). Prong one was established because of J.H.'s ... supra , 103 N.J. at 602-11, was codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and requires the State to establish each of the ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four requirements "are not discrete and separate; they ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The child suffered harm because, due to J.H ... with B.H., a circumstance existing since July 10, 2007. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Moreover, J.H. failed to address the deficiencies ... in the child's permanent placement will cause further harm. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The focus of this inquiry is to ...

docket:	a6396-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36332

467 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3321-19.opn.html -- rank: 576

... Division met the four prongs of the best interests standard. N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a). Teresa and Thomas also assert procedural and evidentiary errors ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] The court found Nannan and Dr. Stilwell were both ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship ,' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1), the court noted that Tommy and Andrew were ... the delay of permanent placement [would] add to the harm.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The court noted both parents' inability to complete ... that the Division 'considered alternatives to termination of parental rights.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). The court noted that the Division considered placement ... of parental rights [would] not do more harm than good.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The court found there was 'no realistic ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35705

468 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.M.D and E.D -- rank: 576

... of the four prongs of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4) by clear and 1 This name is ... enduring harm. 2 2 After the conclusion of this trial, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2) was amended to delete the former second sentence ... she had greater family support. Although acknowledging the requirement of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3) that the court 'consider[] alternatives to termination of ... for by relatives. As with the post-trial amendments to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2), because defendant does not argue for retroactive application ... rights is in Chris's best interests in accordance with N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1)-(4). Affirmed. A-2495-20 25 This archive ...

docket:	a2495-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42052

469 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.L.B IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF S.B. AND I.B -- rank: 576

... the four criteria for terminating parental rights set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We agree with the trial judge that DYFS clearly ... NOT CONSTITUTE CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF PARENTAL "UNFITNESS" UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1 CRITERIA (C) THE DIVISION FAILED TO MAKE "REASONABLE EFFORTS" UNDER ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); see also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... or would continue to be endangered by the parental relationship. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). B. T.L.B. challenges the trial judge ... K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at 352 (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). The inquiry is "whether that parent can raise ... guardianship complaint. This claim is not supported by the record. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c) defines "reasonable efforts" as actions by the Division " ...

docket:	a3517-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50472

470 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.L.S -- rank: 576

... burden as to the first prong of the termination test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1), whether the child's safety, health, or development ... correct the circumstances that led to the children's removal, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). The court also found the Division had adequately ... burden regarding Nora with respect to the second prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), whether the 'parent is unwilling or unable to eliminate ... the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The court found Nora no longer tested positive ... relationship in the past, which was clearly the case here. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). We also reject Nora's argument regarding the ... had proven all four prongs of the best-interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which, in the best interest of the child, ...

docket:	a5301-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19163

471 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4793-16.opn.html -- rank: 576

... statutory burden under each prong of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and convincing evidence. Our review of trial ... judgment of guardianship. The decision tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship[.]' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). '[T]he relevant inquiry focuses on A-4793 ... claims the judge did not apply the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), but instead applied the standard for termination of parental ... effects on [Tracy.]' In applying the best interests standard under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) to evaluate the harm caused to Tracy by Nina ... the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). That harm may include evidence that separating ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20183

472 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. W.A. -- rank: 576

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also In re Guardianship of K.H.O ...

docket:	a2042-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27452

473 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.M.E. and R.J.N., JR IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF C.M.N K.N.N and R.J.N., III Minors -- rank: 576

... R.J.N., Jr. to the three children. 3 II N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) authorizes DYFS to petition for the termination of parental ... safety or development has been endangered by the parental relationship. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1); In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ... unwilling or unable to eliminate the harm to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2); K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at ... v. P.P. , 180 N.J. 494 , 507 (2004) (quoting N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). For J.M.E. to eliminate the harm ... will not do more harm than good to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). In his report, Dr. Loving stated [A]ll ... addition to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to satisfy N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), J.M.E. and R.J.N., Jr. ...

docket:	a1764-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47682

474 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.M.E. and R.J.N., JR IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF C.M.N K.N.N and R.J.N., III Minors -- rank: 576

docket:	a1765-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47682

475 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.W.S. -- rank: 574

... prongs of the 'best interests of the child test' under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. Greg also claims the ... rights must be terminated in a child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires that the Division prove by clear and convincing ... to be, endangered by a continued relationship with Greg. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). A-2287-18T1 12 B. Prong Two The ... further the goal of family reunification; . . . [and] facilitating appropriate visitation.' N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c). 'The diligence of [the Division's] efforts on behalf ... will not do more harm than good' to the child. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4). The fourth prong 'serves as a fail-safe ... Zara, and Dr. Udell's testimony), supporting each of the N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) prongs. To the extent not addressed, Greg's ...

docket:	a2287-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30648

476 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.F. -- rank: 574

... of the four-prong standard codified by the Legislature in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). 2 The mother also does not argue the Division ... the elements of the third prong of this statute. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). The mother's sole contention is the trial ... and convincing evidence the first, second, and fourth prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) and, under the third prong, the Division made reasonable ... the court erred when it determined the third prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) was fulfilled. The mother argues the Division did not ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...

docket:	a4197-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30826

477 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. G.T.M. -- rank: 574

... Court's holding in A.W. , codifying the standard at N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). See L. 1991, c. 275, § 7. The statute ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four factors are not independent of each other ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). "The harm shown . . . must be one that threatens ... serious and enduring emotional or psychological harm to the child." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). The second prong focuses on parental unfitness and ... necessitated removal and placement of the child in foster case. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3); K.H.O. , supra , 161 N.J. at ... the family of the child's progress, and visitation facilitation. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(c). Those efforts depend upon the facts and circumstances ...

docket:	a4816-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	111970

478 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. I.G. -- rank: 574

... the children's best interests, under the standards codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Division and the Law Guardian oppose the appeal ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] See also A.W. , supra , 103 N.J. at ... s health and safety was endangered by the parental relationship. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1). In fact, the evidence clearly and convincingly established ... unable to provide them with a safe and stable home. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2). Likewise, the trial evidence clearly and convincingly established ... which led to the children's placement outside the home. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). These considerable efforts involved offering a multitude of ... used as a defense to termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3)." Division of Youth & Family Servs. v. P. ...

docket:	a0714-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21340

479 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.L. -- rank: 574

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a); N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. F ... to overcome or remove the harm." Id. at 348 (citing N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(2)). Here, the experts unequivocally shared the opinion that ...

docket:	a1683-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28724

480 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. I.G. -- rank: 574

... evidence the four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the ... of the four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The judge found that Stacy and Ike have not ... evidence all four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We briefly review the well-recognized criteria for terminating ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a).] These four prongs are not independent of each other ... or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v ... the Court concluded that harm under the first prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), was established by a mother’s violation of ...

docket:	a3285-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	52735

Page:1 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 117 Previous 15 Next 15