Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

361 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. A.E.H. -- rank: 476

... satisfied all four prongs of the test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, and established by clear and convincing evidence that termination of ...

docket:	a5903-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61922

362 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.S -- rank: 476

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] The four criteria are not discreet and separate, but overlap ... met its burden of proof as to prong one of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. In addition to his conspicuous long-lasting absence from his ...

docket:	a4293-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-07-22
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	40108

363 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.F. -- rank: 476

... originally set forth in A.W. and now codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, which authorizes termination if the Division of Youth and Family ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] DYFS has the burden of proving each factor by clear ...

docket:	a5038-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	59074

364 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.F. -- rank: 476

... originally set forth in A.W. and now codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, which authorizes termination if the Division of Youth and Family ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] DYFS has the burden of proving each factor by clear ...

docket:	a5398-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	59074

365 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.C. -- rank: 476

... statutory requirements to support termination of her parental rights, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, and that a variety of other errors during the trial ... are now codified in the statutory four-part test, see N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, are not discrete but are to be applied in light ...

docket:	a5909-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	73816

366 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.S -- rank: 476

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] The four criteria are not discreet and separate, but overlap ... met its burden of proof as to prong one of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. In addition to his conspicuous long-lasting absence from his ...

docket:	a4021-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40844

367 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES,1 v. J.L.H. and T.T IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF J.H Minor -- rank: 476

... and Family Services (Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree and affirm. We ... order of guardianship. His opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ...

docket:	a2860-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	10504

368 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.C. -- rank: 476

... and Permanency (the Division) failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. We disagree and affirm. I ... evidence all four prongs of the best interest test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. The Family Part judge analyzed prongs one and two together ...

docket:	a4118-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22628

369 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.E. -- rank: 473

... and Permanency (the "Division") failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. After reviewing the evidence presented ... judgment of guardianship. Her opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ...

docket:	a2399-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10096

370 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2642-13xx.opn.html -- rank: 473

... and Permanency (the "Division") failed to prove each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. After reviewing the evidence presented ... judgment of guardianship. Her opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11807

371 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.J. and B.T.C. -- rank: 473

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-11 (1986), and codified as N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a: a. The division shall initiate a petition to terminate parental ... rights was in A.L.J.’s best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. Judge Fineman’s decision is amply supported by substantial credible ...

docket:	a5678-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17727

372 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.J. and B.T.C. -- rank: 473

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-11 (1986), and codified as N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a: a. The division shall initiate a petition to terminate parental ... rights was in A.L.J.’s best interests. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. Judge Fineman’s decision is amply supported by substantial credible ...

docket:	a5695-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17720

373 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.I.M.T. and A.B IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF W.J.B and B.D.B Minors -- rank: 473

... II THE JUDGMENT OF GUARDIANSHIP SHOULD BE REVERSED BECAUSE UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1A CRITERIA THERE DID NOT EXIST COMPELLING REASONS TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT ...

docket:	a0373-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71389

374 OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.I.M.T. and A.B IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF W.J.B and B.D.B Minors -- rank: 473

... II THE JUDGMENT OF GUARDIANSHIP SHOULD BE REVERSED BECAUSE UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1A CRITERIA THERE DID NOT EXIST COMPELLING REASONS TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT ...

docket:	a0265-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71391

375 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.W. -- rank: 473

... Division) failed to prove each of the four prongs in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. After reviewing the evidence presented ... judgment of guardianship. Her opinion tracks the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, accords with In re Guardianship of K.H.O. , 161 ...

docket:	a5092-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15714