Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

406 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4982-18.opn.html -- rank: 456

... used as a defense to termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a(3).' N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. P ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24021

407 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. A.A.-S. -- rank: 456

... her parental rights was in the children's best interests, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a. She also claims her due process rights were violated when ...

docket:	a4267-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30142

408 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.W. -- rank: 453

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] See also A.W. , supra , 103 N.J. at 604 ... record, more hope-laden than reality-based. The standards of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a for terminating parental rights have been fully met, and the ...

docket:	a5840-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-03-09
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	42881

409 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.A.R. -- rank: 453

... 103 N.J. 591 , 604-11 (1986), and codified as N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a: a. The division shall initiate a petition to terminate parental ...

docket:	a2889-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-03-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32715

410 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. R.B. and D.S IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF T.B., A Minor -- rank: 453

... four prongs of the best interests test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a by clear and convincing evidence. That test requires a clear ...

docket:	a1187-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46758

411 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.W IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF J.J.W., a minor -- rank: 453

... NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL FINDING THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS UNDER N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a WERE MET IN THIS CASE. A. THE FIRST PRONG OF ...

docket:	a1216-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24855

412 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.A. -- rank: 453

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] "The four criteria enumerated in the best interests standard are ...

docket:	a5510-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	47426

413 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.C. and A.E.G. -- rank: 453

... by clear and convincing evidence, the factors required by statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, and in case law, see Division of Youth and Family ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] See also A.W. , supra , 103 N.J. at 604 ...

docket:	a4539-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	80874

414 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.C. and A.E.G. -- rank: 453

... by clear and convincing evidence, the factors required by statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, and in case law, see Division of Youth and Family ... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] See also A.W. , supra , 103 N.J. at 604 ...

docket:	a4538-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	80874

415 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. B.R. -- rank: 453

... Super. 435 , 439 (App. Div. 2002). Termination actions brought under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, are decided under a four-part "best interests of the ... the child's best interests, assessed under the statutory standard, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, warrants termination of appellant's parental rights. R. 2:11 ...

docket:	a4872-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-12-18
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	29577

416 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.W IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF P.W., a minor -- rank: 449

... interests of the child, a four-prong standard, codified in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, must be established. This standard allows for termination when the ...

docket:	a5575-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43724

417 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. S.F. -- rank: 449

... visitation. II. Unlike a guardianship initiated by DYFS pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a, kinship legal guardianship does not terminate parental rights. Instead, the ...

docket:	A0106-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-05
status:	published
citation:	392 N.J. Super. 201 920 A.2d 652
Document Size:	43312

418 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. I.N.M. -- rank: 449

... of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [ N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a.] These factors are not viewed in isolation, but rather "they ...

docket:	a5574-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52827

419 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.Y. and A.J. -- rank: 449

... statutory test was met by clear and convincing evidence. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a(1) (requiring clear and convincing evidence that the children's ... the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a(2). We cannot tell from the judge's cursory opinion ...

docket:	a1841-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62545

420 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.Y. and A.J. -- rank: 449

... statutory test was met by clear and convincing evidence. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a(1) (requiring clear and convincing evidence that the children's ... the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm." N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a(2). We cannot tell from the judge's cursory opinion ...

docket:	a1858-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62538