Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 ALEXANDER DIMATTIES v. ECHELON GLEN APARTMENTS, ECHELON GLEN MANAGEMENT -- rank: 536

... to satisfy the intentional wrong exclusion to the bar. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We disagree with the judge's conclusion and reverse. Considering ... wrong." Ibid. (internal quotations omitted). This exclusive remedy established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "embodies 'an historic trade-off whereby employees relinquish their right ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Ibid. "When evaluating whether a claimant has satisfied those two ...

docket:	A2420-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42284

137 JANET CUMMINGS v. TUSCAN DAIRIES -- rank: 536

... to whether defendant's conduct constituted an "intentional wrong" under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which would remove the bar of the Workers' Compensation Act ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong . [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (emphasis added).] "Because the [Workers' Compensation] Act involved a historic ... their degree, are subject to the "exclusive remedy" bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Millison , supra , 101 N.J. at 183. A substantial or ...

docket:	A3062-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49956

138 RUTH ESTHER GUERRERO PARADES v. PASH APPAREL, INC. -- rank: 536

... management and control positions satisfying the "intentional wrong" standard of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, see , e.g. , Laidlow v. Hariton Machine Co. , 170 N ... a cause of action under the "intentional wrong" standard of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 as interpreted and applied in case law, is not an ...

docket:	a6317-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18465

139 MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC ASSOCIATES VS. PAUL HAWRYLUK -- rank: 536

... Co. , 107 N.J. Super. 189 , 193 (App. Div. 1969); N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.     As noted, supra , the Act is a form of remedial ...

docket:	a0249-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-30
status:	published
citation:	317 N.J.Super. 338
Document Size:	24519

140 YAN PING WANG v. ST. PETERS HOSPITAL, INC. -- rank: 533

... did not fit the intentional wrong exception to this bar. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The judge granted summary judgment, concluding that plaintiffs did not ...

docket:	A4009-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51706

141 MICHAEL J. FENDT v. ADAM L. ABRAHAMS JULIUS D ABRAHAMS, JV PAVING and JEFFREY R. VALVANO - -- rank: 533

... or death would result, thereby overcoming the exclusive remedy provision, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, in the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act). N.J.S ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] The intentional wrong exception to the exclusivity of relief provided ...

docket:	a2333-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27111

142 BOBBY ROBINSON v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORP OF NEW JERSEY,1 and AIR JOY HEATING AND COOLING INC. and PARAMOUNT HOMES AT ASBURY URBAN RENEWAL LLC TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORP. OF NEW JERSEY and PARAMOUNT HOMES AT ASBURY URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. HARLEYS -- rank: 530

... therefore entitled to immunity for any alleged negligence pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We review the facts and procedural history relevant to the ... law remedies even if the employer has been negligent. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (providing that "[i]f an injury . . . is compensable" under the ...

docket:	a1370-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-28
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27639

143 ROBERT L. FISHER, et al. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. -- rank: 527

... whether the exclusive-remedy provision of the workers' compensation statute, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, bars plaintiffs from filing a common law tort action against ... remedy provision of the New Jersey Workers Compensation Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (emphasis added).] After completion of full discovery, defendant moved for ... for summary judgment based on the workers' compensation bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8: [A]s a practical matter, when an employee sues an ...

docket:	A2672-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-10-27
status:	published
citation:	363 N.J. Super. 457 833 A.2d 650
Document Size:	37576

144 STEPHEN BUYNIE, et al. v. AIRCO, INC., et al. -- rank: 518

... may seek both workers' compensation benefits and common-law remedies. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "precludes employees who have suffered occupational disease from maintaining a ...

docket:	A3193-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	99554

145 JUNE BERGEN v. ABLE ENERGY, INC. -- rank: 518

... exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that the employer's conduct did not constitute an ... damage to these properties was in excess of $500. II. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that when, by express or implied agreement, the parties ...

docket:	a5095-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	41951

146 JUNE BERGEN v. ABLE ENERGY, INC. -- rank: 518

... exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that the employer's conduct did not constitute an ... damage to these properties was in excess of $500. II. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that when, by express or implied agreement, the parties ...

docket:	a5074-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	41952

147 LINDA A. WEJNERT v. MCCAIN FOODS USA, INC -- rank: 518

... of the Work ers' Compensation Act exclusive remedy provision. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. A-1525-18T1 2 that it failed to safely store ...

docket:	a1525-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39632

148 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a4307-14.opn.html -- rank: 515

... was immune from suit under the Workers' Compensation Act. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. She does not appeal that ruling, so the liability of ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44198

149 JEANETTE BLACKSHEAR v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC -- rank: 515

... for injuries sustained by employees in the course of employment, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 allows relief from the exclusivity bar in cases of intentional ...

docket:	a3525-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30955

150 CONG SU v. DAVID'S COOKIES -- rank: 515

... wrong." Ibid. (internal quotations omitted). This exclusive remedy established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 "embodies 'an historic trade-off whereby employees relinquish their right ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Ibid. "When evaluating whether a claimant has satisfied those two ...

docket:	a1121-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23146