Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

151 JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. RENEE LEMPKE -- rank: 512

... employer for injuries arising out of the course of employment, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8; see, e.g. , Kristiansen v. Morgan , 153 N.J. 298 ...

docket:	a5336-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22035

152 JULIO & RITA ESTRADA V. HENDRICKSAW CORP., ET ALS -- rank: 509

... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (second paragraph). As a result, a "co-employee" of an ... as plaintiff, the "fellow employee" or "co-employee" immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 literally and contends that the immunity applies only to "an ... act which allegedly caused the accident.     The second paragraph of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, quoted above, was adopted in 1961. As a result, the ...

docket:	a6015-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-20
status:	published
citation:	302 N.J.Super. 262
Document Size:	11984

153 MAGDALENA JAROSZ v. G&B LLC -- rank: 509

... law remedies even if the employer has been negligent. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (providing that "[i]f an injury . . . is compensable" under the ... related injuries, except for claims based on an "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. "[A]n employer who causes the death or injury of ...

docket:	a0790-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43168

154 JOHN DUTCHER v. PEDRO PEDEIRO -- rank: 503

... for a waiver of the right to sue their employer. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. For purposes of workers' compensation, a worker may have two ...

docket:	a1088-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41010

155 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1650-17.opn.html -- rank: 503

... plaintiff's claim was barred by the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15- 8, because she was a 'special employee' of Allendale when she ... related injury claims brought by an employee against their employer. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. An employee is broadly defined as one 'who perform[s ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17521

156 ROBERT MILLER - v. SAKER SHOPRITE - -- rank: 496

... injury had occurred within the scope of his employment. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (providing that workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy for non ...

docket:	a3746-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32909

157 DELFINA KACZOROWSKA v. NATIONAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION - EAST et al. -- rank: 490

... of action against her employer beyond the remedy provided therein, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, unless the employer's action was an "intentional wrong." N ...

docket:	a6219-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-06-01
status:	published
citation:	342 N.J. Super. 580
Document Size:	33189

158 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE TOWN OF KEARNY -- rank: 487

... due to the bar of the Workers Compensation statute. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The order further declared that the General policy provided UIM ...

docket:	a1954-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32264

159 DEBORAH MINGAY v. RAD DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC -- rank: 484

... that her complaint is barred by the immunity provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Following the completion of discovery, plaintiff moved for summary judgment ... rights to any other method, form or amount of compensation." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The employer and co-employees of the injured worker are ...

docket:	a0209-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27323

160 DENISE SPATOLA v. SEABROOK BROTHERS SONS, INC -- rank: 481

... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong. [N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] The standard for proving the 'intentional wrong' exception is 'formidable ...

docket:	a2761-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20219

161 MICHAEL F. FUGATT v. DENNISON GRAINE -- rank: 481

... scope of employment is also immune from tort liability under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." Wunschel v. City of Jersey City , 96 N.J. 651 ...

docket:	a5353-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20185

162 IONBOND, INC v. VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 481

... indemnity for the suit, asserting the Workers' Compensation Act bar, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and specific exclusion within the employers' liability provision of the ... to evade the exclusivity bar of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The employee likely would not have been successful as a ...

docket:	a3370-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-12-06
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24527

163 WILMER HALL V. ROCCO FANTICONE, ET ALS -- rank: 478

... against D&P was under the Workers' Compensation Act. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We conclude plaintiff was jointly employed by D&P and ...

docket:	a2926-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-06-24
status:	published
citation:	322 N.J.Super. 302
Document Size:	17941

164 WILLARD E. APPLEGATE, JR., et al. v. ARCH ALUMINUM & GLASS, INC. -- rank: 475

... CALL 911 THEREBY OVERCOMING THE WORKER'S COMPENSATION BAR OF N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that workers' compensation affords the exclusive remedy for employees ... do so does not rise to the level required by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, Millison , or subsequent Supreme Court decisions implementing Millison in various ...

docket:	A1122-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-09-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31882

165 JEANNE FINNEGAN v. INDUCTOTHERM CORP -- rank: 475

... for plaintiff's injuries because of the workers' compensation bar, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and pursuant to Ramos , supra , Inductotherm could not seek contribution ...

docket:	a4267-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30045