Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 ZDZISLAW KRZYZANSKI et al. v. SWEPCO TUBE CORPORATION, SWEPCO TUBE, LLC, et al. -- rank: 442

... will not constitute an intentional wrong within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. That standard will be met only if [the conduct and ... wrong" resulting in avoidance of the exclusive-remedy bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Id. at 615. In the face of the legislature's ...

docket:	a6309-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-30
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	39361

182 MARCIA C. CAQUES et al. v. HERNAN CAQUES -- rank: 432

... of the "exclusive remedy" provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Plaintiffs opposed the motion. Judge Hector R. Velazquez granted defendant ... defendant is entitled to the immunity afforded an employer by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8." We disagree and affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by ...

docket:	A1584-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34952

183 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4951-17.opn.html -- rank: 426

... precluded by the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, from bringing a claim in the Law Division that PSE ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16732

184 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3294-17.opn.html -- rank: 426

... therefore entitled only to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Plaintiff also appeals from the February 20, 2018 order denying ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20583

185 DANIELLE FRY v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP -- rank: 423

... N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -142. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The same bar applies to claims against fellow employees. Barone ...

docket:	a5775-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20774

186 ARSENIO VEGA VS STANDARD MACHINERY CO., ET AL -- rank: 420

... afforded an employee injured in the course of his employment. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The case of Wilson v. Faull , 27 N.J. 105 ...

docket:	A2313-94
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	1996-05-21
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J. Super. 434
Document Size:	20052

187 FOUAD ABOUCHOKR v. SLAVCO CONSTRUCTION CO -- rank: 417

... based upon, in part, the workers' compensation exclusivity bar. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. On August 6, 2010, plaintiff moved: 1) to reinstate his ...

docket:	a1210-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33758

188 SCOTT SLOAN V. ADLAI E. LUYANDO, ET ALS -- rank: 417

... 540.     The exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, provides that:         Such agreement shall be a surrender by the ...

docket:	a1128-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-10-07
status:	published
citation:	305 N.J.Super. 140
Document Size:	30556

189 GUISEPPINA VERTERAMO, et al. v. WINSTON TOWERS 200 ASSOCIATES, et al. -- rank: 417

... barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, and that plaintiff had no basis to sue Rose Associates ... exclusivity clause, an injured employee must prove an intentional wrong. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. This requires a showing that the employer had a "deliberate ...

docket:	a6498-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32478

190 AMY LEE v. ST. BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER -- rank: 405

... plaintiff's "exclusive remedy" was under the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We affirm. Before accepting employment with Medical Services, plaintiff had ...

docket:	a5983-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32552

191 New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company v. Delta Plastics Corporation, et al -- rank: 405

... company. To avoid the workers’ compensation exclusive-remedy bar of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, Attune alleged that Delta’s conduct created an “intentional wrong ...

docket:	a-87-05
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2006-12-04
status:
citation:	188 N.J. 582
Document Size:	14203

192 CZESLAW CIAPINSKI v. CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION -- rank: 402

... personal injury action because of the workers' compensation bar under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 arising from its status as plaintiff's employer. The judge ...

docket:	a4505-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-01-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	127961

193 ESTATE OF MONICA HART v. JONATHAN SINGER -- rank: 399

... claim based upon the worker's compensation exclusivity bar. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The trial court also issued an order at that time ...

docket:	a5950-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	60060

194 LAWRENCE J. KELLER v. TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY -- rank: 399

... for injuries sustained by employees in the course of employment, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 allows relief from the exclusivity bar in cases of an ...

docket:	a5767-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-22
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16369

195 CECILIA SILVA v. CHARLES SODERSTROM -- rank: 399

... negligence lawsuit would be barred by the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Act is to "be construed liberally, 'in order to ...

docket:	a5653-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-03-27
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	43088