Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 TODD LARMER v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY -- rank: 637

... for negligent acts of Larmer and Piantadosi are barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides that all claims for negligent acts by co ... for negligently hiring/maintaining Larmer and Piantadosi was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Worker's Compensation Act provides the sole remedy under ...

docket:	a2851-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	79144

77 LOUIS MAGNIFICO v. NATHANIEL JAMES -- rank: 637

... for Louis's medical expenses in accordance with the Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The court then found that '[e]xcept in cases of ... 449, 459 (2012); Caraballo, 237 N.J. at 265. Indeed, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides: [i]f an injury or death is compensable under ... employer's act to lose the cloak of immunity of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) the employer must know ...

docket:	a0883-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31267

78 LOUIS PIANTADOSI v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY -- rank: 637

... for negligent acts of Larmer and Piantadosi are barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides that all claims for negligent acts by co ... for negligently hiring/maintaining Larmer and Piantadosi was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Worker's Compensation Act provides the sole remedy under ...

docket:	a2778-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	79148

79 RAMONA SILLS v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC amp; GAS CO., INC. -- rank: 637

... for negligent acts of Larmer and Piantadosi are barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides that all claims for negligent acts by co ... for negligently hiring/maintaining Larmer and Piantadosi was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The Worker's Compensation Act provides the sole remedy under ...

docket:	a3340-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	76021

80 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2431-20.opn.html -- rank: 634

... suits by employees against their employers did not apply. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 (excepting 1 The CRA is modeled after the Federal Civil ... that Camden's conduct amounted to an intentional wrong under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Plaintiff also argues that he presented a prima facie case ... that Camden's conduct amounted to an intentional wrong, and N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 did not foreclose his complaint.2 III. In addition to ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29665

81 BESNICK GJANA VS. DAIBES ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. -- rank: 634

... course of employment.' N.J.S.A. 34:15-7; N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The New Jersey Supreme Court has 'long recognized that [the ... right to any other method or type of compensation. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. As plaintiff's employer, Waterside was entitled to invoke the ...

docket:	a2651-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-06-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26874

82 LEE E. HOLCK v. P.H.A. INCORPORATED -- rank: 631

... answer, asserting, among other defenses, the statutory immunity contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. After pre-trial discovery, defendant moved for summary judgment on ... for physical injuries and loss of employment was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In his oral decision, the judge extensively reviewed the evidence ... an "intentional wrong," so as to vault the statutory bar. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. We therefore affirm. The Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S ... Victor Lynn Lines, Inc. , 32 N.J. 479 , 489 (1960). N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides that Workers' Compensation is the exclusive remedy for work ...

docket:	a2032-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43281

83 RUDOLPH LAIDLOW et al. v. HARITON MACHINERY CO., INC., et al. -- rank: 628

... that the “intentional wrong” exception to the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, applied, and plaintiff was not barred from seeking further recovery ... fell within the exception to the exclusive remedy provision of N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. That statute provides in pertinent part:             If an injury or ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong.         [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.] The limitation contained in the statute reflects the policy and ...

docket:	a5991-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-12-06
status:	published
citation:	335 N.J.Super. 330
Document Size:	50114

84 ON-TARGET STAFFING, LLC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 621

... More particularly, On- Target argued the claims were barred under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8, which provides that compensation for an unintentional injury or death ... Mach. Co., Inc., 170 N.J. 602, 611 (2002) (describing N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 as the 'exclusive remedy provision of the' WCA and 'the ...

docket:	a1451-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62390

85 MARY DiNARDO v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 618

... address the issue of whether the Workers' Compensation bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 precluded plaintiff's tort claim. The judge noted that he ...

docket:	a0781-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23060

86 PHILIP VITALE v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION -- rank: 618

... exception of injuries resulting from an employer's "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. This exception "must be interpreted very narrowly" for the purpose ...

docket:	a1156-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-22
status:	published
citation:	447 N.J.Super. 98 146 A.3d 162
Document Size:	71201

87 EDWARD H. MARINELLI, ET ALS V. MITTS & MERRILL, ET AL -- rank: 615

... under the intentional injury exception to the Workers' Compensation immunity, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. They also appeal from a summary judgment on their claim ... the defendant employer's actions constituted an intentional wrong under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs' personal injury claims against defendant ... as the person injured or killed, except for intentional wrong.     [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-8.]     Plaintiffs argue that the intentional act exception applies in this ...

docket:	a5095-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-07-03
status:	published
citation:	303 N.J.Super. 61
Document Size:	44809

88 MICHAEL DeLEON v. GLIMCHER REALTY TRUST, -- rank: 615

... based upon the exclusivity provision of the Act. We agree. N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 provides: If an injury or death is compensable under this ...

docket:	a1160-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22997

89 GEORGE WASHINGTON v. RUNNELLS OPERATING, LLC and CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC -- rank: 615

... their employment at the time of the accident, that therefore N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 did not apply, and that [Acikgoz's] accident was not ... In any event, the application of the exclusivity bar in N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 depends upon whether the claims are, in fact, compensable for ...

docket:	a3996-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-25
status:
citation:
Document Size:	21093

90 Philip Pantano v. New York Shipping Association -- rank: 609

... favor of CSNJ because of the statutory bar established by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. MT also moved for summary judgment, arguing that it was ... agreed to opt out of the workers’ compensation system. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. In seeking summary judgment, MT argued that it was not ...

docket:	a-19-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-04-25
status:
citation:
Document Size:	41010