Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD SABATINO -- rank: 1000

... motor vehicle violation of failing to use a cross-walk. N.J.S.A. 39:4-33. We disagree. "Probable cause exists if at the time of ... to believe defendant committed what is commonly known as jaywalking. N.J.S.A. 39:4-33. Consequently, defendant could have had no "legitimate" purpose in crossing ... the side of the minivan; and he may have violated N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 in doing so. However, defendant had a legitimate purpose in ... that the officer was authorized to arrest defendant for violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-33, the jaywalking statute, or N.J.S.A. 39:3 ... standard, there were insufficient grounds to arrest defendant for violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-33, the jaywalking statute, or N.J.S.A. 39:3 ...

docket:	a0565-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39553

2 6384-03T5 GUSTAVO ABAD et al. v. ILENE B. GAGLIARDI et al. -- rank: 945

... judge erroneously charged the jury as to the applicability of N.J.S.A. 39:4-33, concerning the obligation of pedestrians to cross in crosswalks at ... the crosswalk it was appropriate to charge the jury under N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 because the statute most appropriately addressed the circumstances of this ... trial judge erred in charging the jury with respect to N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 rather than N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, and ... thereby changing the commonlaw rule formerly applicable to such situations." N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 provides: At intersections where traffic is directed by a police ... not only at an intersection controlled by a traffic light, N.J.S.A. 39:4-33, but it was not a situation where a pedestrian would ... there was an "absence of a crosswalk." Therefore, under either N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 or -34 , plaintiff had a legal obligation to cross ...

docket:	a6384-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-06-24
status:	published
citation:	378 N.J. Super. 503
Document Size:	46599

3 BRIAN J. RICE v. CHRISTINA M. MILLER -- rank: 942

... lawful; and (2) should not have charged the jury with N.J.S.A. 39:4-33, a statute that disallows certain pedestrian crossings. We reject these arguments. Two related motor vehicle statutes, N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, bear upon the analysis. N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 instructs: At intersections where traffic is directed by a police ... shall move, whenever practicable, upon the right half of crosswalks. [ N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 (emphasis added).] The 'flip side' of N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 is N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, which reads ... a police officer or 10 A-2513-16T3 traffic signal,' N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 plainly obligates the pedestrian to use a crosswalk and, ...

docket:	a2513-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-05
status:	published
citation:	455 N.J.Super. 90 187 A.3d 885
Document Size:	82447

4 PATRICIA SHILINSKY v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD -- rank: 608

... cross the highway at a point other than a crosswalk." N.J.S.A. 39:4-33. "Where traffic is not controlled and directed either by a ...

docket:	a0028-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44405

5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2466-20.opn.html -- rank: 564

... that plaintiff crossed Pacific Avenue outside of the crosswalk, violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-33.1 A plaintiff uses property with due care when: 1 ... reasonably be said to have caused the injury. Vincitore, 1 N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 provides: '[a]t intersections where traffic is directed by a ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16466