Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

151 CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. NORTHERN NJ ORTHO SPECIALISTS -- rank: 519

... policies provide PIP coverage, including payment of 'reasonable medical expenses,' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a). [Cobo v. Market Transition Facility, 293 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a1669-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20581

152 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BERNIE J. HARDY, KASON CHEEKS et al. -- rank: 516

... trial court found for defendants. Manufacturers appeals and we reverse.      N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 mandates PIP coverage for covered individuals "who sustain bodily injury ... with whom Cheeks resided at the time of the accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Therefore, I dissent.     PIP benefits are payable to covered individuals ... as a result of an accident while occupying . . . an automobile . . . ." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. An "automobile," for these purposes, is defined as "a private ...

docket:	A1214-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-01-17
status:	published
citation:	357 N.J. Super. 19 813 A.2d 123
Document Size:	32163

153 ENDO SURGI CENTER v. NJM INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 516

... 1 'PIP' means personal injury protection as provided for in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 2 Endo Surgi's claim requested reimbursement for services on ... 1934-17T3 3 op. at 3) (alterations in original) (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6(a)). 'ASC facility fees are listed in Appendix, Exhibit ...

docket:	a1934-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:	459 N.J.Super. 289 209 A.3d 904
Document Size:	16175

154 ANN GIESGUTH v. ANTHONY J. COSTANZA and JOYCE M. COSTANZA -- rank: 516

... no medical tests were performed on plaintiff in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7, and no neurological exam was conducted. In a similar ...

docket:	a3501-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14161

155 ROBERT L. CAMP, JR. v. SALVATORE LUMMINO, et al. -- rank: 514

... Gengor , 121 N.J. Eq. 349 , 353 (E&A. 1937). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(b) See footnote 4 4 can hardly be said ... 8 because they appear to agree that the impact of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 with respect thereto would affect the issue before us ... attained the legal age." Footnote: 4      4 Other provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 were simultaneously amended and created by L. 1997, c ...

docket:	A2530-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-06-28
status:	published
citation:	352 N.J. Super. 414 800 A.2d 234
Document Size:	13877

156 CHARLES J. KRAUT v. ERICA F. DIGIOVANNI -- rank: 514

... pursuing his claims for economic and non-economic damages under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5. In opposing the motion, plaintiff presented several arguments: (1 ... Therefore, plaintiff argued he was exempt from the strictures of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5. The trial court granted summary judgment. The May 8 ...

docket:	a3664-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7602

157 MICHELLE CATENA v. DAPHKA JASMIN -- rank: 514

... Agha v. Feiner , 198 N.J. 50 , 60-61 (2009); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7; N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.5. The ...

docket:	a2906-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-01-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38168

158 STEVEN PORTNOFF v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 514

... in AICRA provides, in relevant part: The benefits provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10] . . . shall be payable as loss accrues, upon written ... military personnel shall be deducted from the benefits collectible under [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10] . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6.] The ... should apply to income continuation benefits, i bid. , and because N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10 link income loss to physical disability, income continuation ...

docket:	A1442-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-25
status:	published
citation:	392 N.J. Super. 377 920 A.2d 761
Document Size:	69805

159 STEPHEN ROBERTS v. MALVYN ST. LOUIS -- rank: 514

... required to provide such coverage under either policy pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, requiring "every standard automobile liability insurance policy" to provide PIP ...

docket:	a1173-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-17
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25568

160 Camie Livsey v. Mercury Insurance Group -- rank: 507

... the uninsured vehicle. On the other hand, the PIP statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, expressly permits recovery for injuries “caused by . . . an object ... or by an object propelled by or from an automobile [.] [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (emphasis supplied).] Specifically in the PIP context, this Court already ... or from an automobile.’” Id. at 245 (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4). In concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to PIP benefits ...

docket:	a-96-07
court:
decided:	2009-02-19
status:
citation:	197 N.J. 522
Document Size:	72807

161 DONALD E. FISCOR V. ATLANTIC CO. BD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS ET AL -- rank: 507

... use of the automobile with the named insured's permission. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. To determine whether the use of a vehicle falls within ... Security-Responsibility Law which mandated inclusion of an omnibus clause); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -2 (requiring a similar form omnibus clause and exempting ...

docket:	a5402-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-07-19
status:	published
citation:	293 N.J.Super. 19
Document Size:	37308

162 EDWARD & BARBARA ADAMS VS COOPER HOSPITAL, ET AL -- rank: 504

... E]vidence of the amounts collectible or paid pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and 39:6A-10], to an injured person . . . is inadmissible ...

docket:	a170-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-11-13
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	25497

163 NEWARK INSURANCE COMPANY v. VALORA'S SECOND CAR CENTER -- rank: 504

... 39:6A-3, and that coverage must include PIP benefits, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, but rather a policy providing coverage for products liability or ...

docket:	a6085-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	46402

164 RAYMOND NESBY and LAUREN NESBY -- rank: 502

... permits 'stacking of policies' for PIP benefits. On the contrary, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 expressly prohibits an insured from recovering PIP benefits from ...

docket:	a0958-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-18
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20320

165 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 502

... to an amount of $250,000 per person per accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. However, where benefits paid by a PIP insurer exceed $75 ...

docket:	a4602-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-06-29
status:	published
citation:	341 N.J. Super. 528
Document Size:	16632