Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 CHUBB GROUP, ET AL., VS TRENTON BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 478

... to make that determination. Ibid. This principle is codified in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and 10] and the insured is entitled to, but has ...

docket:	a1907-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-08-07
status:	published
citation:	304 N.J.Super. 10
Document Size:	27754

182 LLEDON JAMES v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 473

... through New Jersey Family Care, or Medicaid. As required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 4.3(f), State Farm thereafter provided Lledon with PIP benefits ...

docket:	a4761-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-18
status:	Published
citation:	457 N.J.Super. 576 202 A.3d 23
Document Size:	32641

183 MOMUDO F. ROGERS et al. v. JULIAN M. CARCHESIO, JULIAN KATERA DESIGNS, INC. -- rank: 469

... to his car, defendants moved for summary judgment based upon N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 which provides: a. Any person who, at the time ... survives AICRA. Of course, if Caviglia survives Supreme Court review, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a is unconstitutional. This archive is a service of Rutgers ...

docket:	A2616-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-01-29
status:	published
citation:	366 N.J. Super. 181 840 A.2d 925
Document Size:	11725

184 MATTHEW JENDRZEJEWSKI v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 469

... medical expenses benefits coverage on his motor vehicle pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a).     Judge Robert A. Longhi decided in favor of ... association to assess the cost of such protection among insurers." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a provides that a person "shall have no cause of ... which he failed to maintain medical expense benefits coverage. Moreover, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a and -7. He has no control over the affairs ... State became insolvent. He complied with the requirements set by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a and -7 by obtaining a policy of insurance from ...

docket:	A3939-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-06-26
status:	published
citation:	341 N.J. Super. 460
Document Size:	13840

185 NORTH JERSEY NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. v. IFA INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 469

... insurance policies are required to include no-fault PIP coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. PIP coverage provides payment of medical expenses "in an amount ... have been for "eligible medical treatments, diagnostic tests and services[.]" N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a). Defendant's position, in effect, seeks to limit the ...

docket:	a1179-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28555

186 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BRUNSWICK SURGICAL CENTER, PC -- rank: 464

... insured's household without regard to negligence, liability or fault. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Any dispute regarding the recovery of medical expense benefits provided ...

docket:	a4083-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-07-18
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	55590

187 MID-ATLANTIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATES v. ROBERT DENT -- rank: 461

... disability benefits for a reimbursement of any benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and -10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S ...

docket:	a0573-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27261

188 EVILLIN LOPEZ v. PEARSON, INC., et al. -- rank: 461

... was required to maintain, and actually maintained, PIP coverage. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, an automobile for which PIP coverage is required is defined ... vehicle and it is this fact which triggers application of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, not whether defendants complied with the statutory requirements. N . J ...

docket:	A1828-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-11-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45011

189 JANNA IRVING v. KEILAMARA C. OLIVEIRA -- rank: 459

... to have her personal injury protection claim (PIP claim), under N.J.S.A . 39:6A-4 to 39:6A-5.1, paid by defendant the Unsatisfied ... policy from her household responsible for her PIP claim. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The trial court held that Allstate is responsible for this ...

docket:	a4663-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31767

190 Victor Dziuba and Alexandra Dziuba, husband and wife v. Scott J. Fletcher et als. -- rank: 459

... at the time of the accident, was barred, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a, from recovering non-economic damages.     On August 16, 2000 ... benefits and economic loss damages. The appellate panel noted that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5, the uninsured vehicle must be the vehicle involved in ... for the reasons expressed in Judge Weissbard’s written opinion. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a does not preclude an injured uninsured motorist from recovering ... this matter to review the Appellate Division judgment holding that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a does not bar plaintiff’s recovery of non-economic ... In such circumstances, we agree with the Appellate Division that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a does not preclude an injured plaintiff from recovering non ...

docket:	a-90-05
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2006-10-12
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	14150

191 ZACHARY C. LEWIS v. CITY OF WILDWOOD -- rank: 459

... by automobile insurance subject to medical fee schedules mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4(a) ("Medical treatments, diagnostic tests, and services provided by the ...

docket:	a3523-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28900

192 JOSE ECHEVERRI v. -- rank: 457

... alighting from or using an automobile, or while a pedestrian. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Echeverri contends that the motion judge erred as a matter ... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, -3; see also N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. [ Id. at 546 (emphasis in original, footnote omitted).] The statutory ...

docket:	a4190-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-03-14
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	17044

193 TYRONE S. HENRY, SR v. SANTOSH S. BHOWMIK -- rank: 449

... in 7 A-3331-15T4 automobile accidents regardless of fault. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 in relevant part states: [E]very standard automobile liability insurance ...

docket:	a3331-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46191

194 FRANCISCO LUGO v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 449

... to the deductible and co-payment provisions in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.1." The parties settled this first litigation and executed a ... to the deductible and co-payment provisions in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, and in accordance with the terms of the policy ...

docket:	a5562-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-25
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	37565

195 Camie Livsey v. Mercury Insurance Group -- rank: 447

... favor of the insurer. 1. The Court's interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, expressly permits recovery for injuries "caused by . . . an object propelled ... ownership, maintenance, operation or use of such uninsured . . . motor vehicle[.]" N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (emphasis supplied).] Specifically in the PIP context, this Court already ...

docket:	a-96-07
court:
decided:	2009-02-19
status:
citation:	197 N.J. 522 964 A.2d 312
Document Size:	92311