Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

196 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALICE KENNEDY -- rank: 445

... in Alice's household, for purposes of PIP coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. He did not credit Christopher's testimony concerning his ... while occupying, entering into, alighting from or using an automobile. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.] Where such coverage exists, it is primary for any resident ... who does not have other coverage: Except as provided in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3d], the personal injury protection coverage of the named insured ... automobile insurance policy for injuries sustained in any one accident. [ N.J.S . A . 39:6A-4.2.] Consequently, although Christopher was a passenger in a vehicle ...

docket:	a4376-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46445

197 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTHCARE INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC -- rank: 445

... during a period beginning in 1995 and ending in 2003. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This court has held that a provider of such services ...

docket:	a5599-04
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-06-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37776

198 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTHCARE INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC -- rank: 445

... during a period beginning in 1995 and ending in 2003. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This court has held that a provider of such services ...

docket:	a2174-05
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39320

199 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NORTHFIELD MEDICAL CENTER -- rank: 440

... bill splitting, thereby avoiding the regulatory prohibition on fragmented billing. N.J.S.A. 39:6A 4.6(b); N.J.A.C. 11:3-29.4 ...

docket:	a0636-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	74105

200 LINDA D'ALOIA v. SANDRA M. GEORGE -- rank: 438

... makes no distinction between plaintiffs bound by the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10], amounts collectible ... copayments or exclusions , including exclusions pursuant to subsection d. of [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], otherwise compensated is inadmissible in a civil action for ...

docket:	A1938-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-12
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 246 858 A.2d 16
Document Size:	14806

201 SHEILA ARONBERG v. WENDELL TOLBERT -- rank: 435

... of the court was delivered by ESPINOSA, J.A.D. N.J.S.A 39:6A-4.5 DID NOT INTEND TO PERMIT FAMILY MEMBERS TO CONTINUE ... with the trial court that the statutory bar created by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 and the Wrongful Death Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 to -6, and their underlying policies. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5 implements a public policy rationale "to deter drunk driving ...

docket:	a4896-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	27-00-23
status:	published
citation:	413 N.J. Super. 562 997 A.2d 246
Document Size:	39430

202 MEITAL RAVIV v. FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP, -- rank: 430

... may be liable, the primary insurer is identified pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. The statute states: Except as provided in subsection d ... automobile insurance policy for injuries sustained in any one accident. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2.] At the time in question, Raviv no longer lived ...

docket:	a5074-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	23190

203 EDWARD G. STEWART VS. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 430

... insured by defendant. He sought PIP benefits in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Defendant denied plaintiff's request relying on the statutory exclusion ...

docket:	a1585-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-02-26
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	14376

204 TERESA KONOPKA et al. v. FREDDIE L. FOSTER -- rank: 426

... medical protocols pursuant to subsection a. of section 4 of [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] and the use of valid diagnostic tests administered in accordance ...

docket:	A0985-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-10-31
status:	published
citation:	356 N.J. Super. 223 812 A.2d 363
Document Size:	25011

205 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4045-19.opn.html -- rank: 426

... PIP) benefits, asserting plaintiff's GEICO policy was 'PRIMARY.' See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (authorizing PIP benefits 'for the named insured and any ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22041

206 JOHNNY RAMIREZ a/k/a JOHNNY RAMIREZ-PINEDA v. JOHNNY RAMIREZ-PINEDA -- rank: 423

... 1978), and therefore was not entitled to PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. We have considered this argument in light of the record ... family" as that statutory term has been construed by caselaw. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 provides in pertinent part that [E]very standard automobile liability ...

docket:	a6192-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	49626

207 Palisades Safety & Insurance Association v. Leonel Bastien and Paule Bastien, et als. -- rank: 423

... the named insured, or pedestrians, injured in an automobile accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. As remedial legislation that is protective of automobile- accident victims ...

docket:	a-119-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-01-29
status:
citation:	175 N.J. 144
Document Size:	27866

208 RICHARD VANN v. MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 423

... are not within the definition of 'automobile' as used in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and, therefore, are not statutorily required to maintain PIP coverage ...

docket:	a4264-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29346

209 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERT LACROIX AND CHRISSY LACROIX -- rank: 421

... to the PIP coverage contained in her father's policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 mandates that Every standard automobile liability insurance policy . . . shall contain ... 48 (2003), the Supreme Court stated the legislative underpinnings of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4: The Legislature provided for PIP benefits as part of New ... the protections afforded by the compulsory PIP coverage provided by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The public policy that requires an insurer to pay innocent ...

docket:	A4006-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-05
status:	published
citation:	390 N.J. Super. 277 915 A.2d 89
Document Size:	38059

210 ROSEMARY FOEHNER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 421

... neither necessary nor reasonable, but this denial seems questionable. II N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 provides that every standard automobile liability insurance policy shall contain ...

docket:	a4640-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	28057