Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

226 LOUIS AVERSANO VS ATLANTIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO. -- rank: 404

... that defendant wrongfully denied personal injury protection benefits mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -5. See footnote 1 Defendant's motion for summary judgment ... way down."     As amended by L. 1983, c. 362, § 7, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 requires that every automobile liability insured policy "shall provide personal ...

docket:	a3592-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-04-25
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 570
Document Size:	13351

227 DAMIAN J. SABLON v. ISRAEL PEREZ -- rank: 402

... for failing to pay Personal Injury Protection benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. On April 18, 2011, the Essex County Sheriff's Office ...

docket:	a2882-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25614

228 Penn National Insurance Company v. Frank Costa, et al. -- rank: 399

... Costa as a representative of all named defendants. 4 See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (statutorily requiring coverage for “personal injury protection benefits for ...

docket:	a-36-08
court:
decided:	2009-03-25
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 229
Document Size:	57322

229 ENDO SURGI CENTER, P.C. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 397

... every automobile liability insurance policy include coverage for PIP benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. In addition, the statute provides that any claim for PIP ...

docket:	A1387-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-09
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 588 919 A.2d 166
Document Size:	36302

230 MICHAEL SYTSMA v. JOHN SERIGNESE -- rank: 397

... and "members of his immediate family residing in his household." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 3 In addition, plaintiff explained that he wanted to "keep ... as a result of an accident caused by an automobile. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. 3 Neither party has raised the issue of whether plaintiff ...

docket:	a4776-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-16
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20636

231 ROBERT WERNER et al. v. JEROLD P. LATHAM, et al. -- rank: 392

... accident, he was not entitled to personal injury protection benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Consequently, his health insurer, defendant Oxford Health Plans, Inc., paid ... not providing the plaintiff with personal injury protection benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Footnote: 2      2 In Achor , the release given by plaintiff ...

docket:	a6799-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-06-15
status:	published
citation:	332 N.J.Super. 76
Document Size:	22273

232 21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION AS STATUTORY ADMINISTRATOR OF UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 390

... because the vehicle that injured him was not an automobile. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Instead, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1 ... providing pedestrian PIP coverage for commercial vehicles in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. The directive further explained that because risk retention groups are ...

docket:	a1773-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17976

233 THE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP OFINSURANCE COMPANIES,Plaintiff-Respondent,v. ROBERT GRAY,Defendant-Appellant. -- rank: 390

... standing outside of his car.     This appeal is governed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, which provides in pertinent part that an insurer must provide ... of the scope of coverage for PIP benefits provided by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4:         A non-occupant of a vehicle may be found to ... are satisfied that defendant is entitled to PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 in accordance with our interpretation of "using an automobile" in ...

docket:	a1391-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-07-23
status:	published
citation:	323 N.J.Super. 338
Document Size:	10303

234 AISHA PINSON v. KARIM ARZADI -- rank: 388

... Gunti successfully moved to dismiss Aisha's complaint pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a). Defendants, however, continued to pursue Rhonda's claim ...

docket:	a5552-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13613

235 LORRAINE WALSH et al. v. MICHAEL WALSH -- rank: 380

... insured and members of his family residing in his household." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This coverage is primary "for the named insured and any ... named insured under an automobile insurance policy of his own." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2. Thus, the question is whether Michael Jr. at the ... member of his father's "family residing in his household." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. First Trenton argues that for Michael Jr. to be covered ...

docket:	A0412-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-10-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32149

236 ANA BIRCK v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 378

... bodily injury while occupying . . . the automobile of the named insured." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. However, the statutory requirements are limited by exclusions based on ...

docket:	A2398-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29511

237 WILLIAM JOHNSTON v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 378

... CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW AND THE BROAD PUBLIC POLICY OF N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 FOUND IN THE CASELAW. POINT III THE COURT'S DECISION ...

docket:	a1842-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24676

238 TYRONE FLOYD v. HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 376

... contracts must be strictly construed by their plain language. III. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 must be interpreted broadly. We find no merit to these ...

docket:	a1950-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17807

239 UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATES v. TRANSPORT DRIVERS, INC -- rank: 373

... rendered to an automobile accident victim at the same facility. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.6 mandates that no-fault policies reimburse healthcare providers pursuant ...

docket:	a3350-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22186

240 USMAN A. RASHABOV v. STEVEN A. ALFUSO -- rank: 373

... 2005, which included coverage for PIP benefits, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. At the time of the application, plaintiff was the only ...

docket:	a3684-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35310