Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 1000

... inserted the words “subsection a” before the citation to N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a) contains the compulsory requirements for BI liability for motor ... second sentence by its additional reference to subsection a. of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. And the second sentence’s reference to N.J.S ... coverage to satisfy at least the liability insurance requirements of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a) or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and ... coverage to satisfy at least the liability insurance requirements of [N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a)] or [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3].� ... “to satisfy at least the liability insurance requirements of [N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a)] or [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3]. ...

docket:	a-27-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80420

2 Tyrone A. Huggins v. Mary E. Aquilar -- rank: 875

... A.C. 13:21-15.2(l). 1 1. Per N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a), every owner of a motor vehicle must maintain liability ... for higher liability insurance coverage than is generally required under N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a), was known, considered, and not altered by the Chief ... maintain higher compulsory liability insurance than is called for under N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). (pp. 15-18) 3. Examination of Federal’s policy ... have personal insurance meeting the compulsory statutory minimum. However, because N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a) requires car “owner[s]” to carry insurance ... context of UIM benefits. Aubrey was not tasked with construing N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a), which mandates liability insurance of “owner[s].� ... and $30,000 per incident, the minimum limits established under N.J.S.A. 39:6B- 1(a). See also N.J.S.A. 39:6A- ...

docket:	a-78-19
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2021-04-21
status:
citation:
Document Size:	58153

3 GUERLINE FELIX v. BRIAN V. RICHARDS -- rank: 832

... any one accident. [Whitaker, 147 N.J. at 348 (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1; N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3).] 'In addition, the ... basic policy is addressed in subsection b, not a, of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. '[T]he meaning of a word or series of words ... amended the statute to add reference to section 'a' of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 that did not include the basic policy. Had the Legislature ...

docket:	a5093-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-01
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35535

4 Denise A. Perrelli v. Bridget Pastorelle -- rank: 822

... Royal Tours of America , 178 N.J. 460 , 466 (2004); N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. Every insurance policy must include PIP benefits, which guarantee � ... provision of New Jersey’s Compulsory Motor Vehicle Insurance Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 to -3, makes it an offense for “[a]ny ...

docket:	A-22-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2011-06-01
status:
citation:
Document Size:	76489

5 UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS GROUP a/s/o HARLEY DAVIDSON OF EDISON v. GEORGE E. HEIBEL -- rank: 787

... that New Jersey's compulsory motor vehicle liability insurance statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, imposes no requirement on an automobile dealer to provide collision ... the policy's express definition of an "insured" and that N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, New Jersey's compulsory motor vehicle liability insurance statute, mandates ... the owner of the motorcycle was not required pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 to obtain insurance covering Heibel as a permissive user; (3 ... dealer's insurance policy. Heibel additionally advocates an interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 that would require coverage, by an automobile dealer's insurance ... Harley. He also claims that under Subsection (4), pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, that Harley was required to have the vehicle insured for ... whether public policy requires such coverage. We are convinced that N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 does not impose a legal obligation on Universal to ...

docket:	a6285-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-20
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	58684

6 United Reciprocal Exchange v. Sabrina A. Perez, et al. -- rank: 787

... Jersey law. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. CURE appealed the decision, and, in a split decision, the ... the no-fault system centers on the Compulsory Insurance Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 to -3, which requires that owners of motor vehicles registered ... forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). In 1998, however, as part of AICRA, L. 1998 ... in both N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. Accordingly, a carrier seeking to retroactively void coverage based upon ... which, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, requires all drivers to maintain mandatory $15,000/$30,000 ...

docket:	a-67-13
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2015-08-13
status:
citation:
Document Size:	69132

7 RONALD RAFANELLO v. JORGE S. TAYLOR-ESQUIVEL -- rank: 782

... of $750,000. On the other hand, AMIC contends that N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 governs the minimum liability insurance coverage for NAB, and N ... either align with the minimum insurance coverage requirements mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 or an increased minimum insurance coverage requirement. See N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1; N.J.S.A. 39:3C-20; N.J.S ...

docket:	a4397-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-23
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	49896

8 THE CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY COMPANY v. RICHARD PODESZWA, et al. -- rank: 779

... business use, such exclusionary language violates neither the requirements of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, nor the public policy of the State. We affirm the ... that Connecticut's denial of coverage violated the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 (Omnibus Clause), as well as the public policy of this ... thereby deem the policy exposed. Id. at 33. Relying on N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, the plaintiff argued there that: [S]tate legislation requires that ... bobtail' provision should not be enforced as being violative of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1," it was not necessary to decide that issue. Ibid. Before ... contrary to New Jersey's compulsory motor vehicle insurance laws, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 and 39:6A-3, as well as being an illegal ... 445-46. That conclusion was based on our interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, the Omnibus Clause. Id. at 445. We determined that ...

docket:	a5982-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-27
status:	published
citation:	392 N.J. Super. 480
Document Size:	96618

9 EMILY MARSHALL v. RARITAN VALLEY DISPOSAL -- rank: 748

... arguably distinguishable from the "arising out of" language found in N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). Illinois National urges us to adopt a narrow interpretation ... have construed this language as affording the coverage required under N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a) for property damage and personal injury "arising out of ... as "arising out of" consistent with the language used in N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a)); Home State , supra , 313 N.J. Super. at 587 ... that the "resulting from" language afforded the same coverage as N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a), and therefore conformed the policy to the "arising out ... resulting from" could provide no lesser coverage than required by N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). Ibid. Accordingly, we reformed the "resulting from" language in ... Podeszwa we held that an exclusionary clause did not violate N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1, even though it excluded from coverage those losses sustained ...

docket:	a2919-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	79497

10 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez -- rank: 748

... Tours of Am., 178 N.J. 460, 466 (2004) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1). Every policy must “contain [PIP] benefits for the payment ...

docket:	a-68-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-05-12
status:
citation:
Document Size:	108237

11 EXCHANGE v. SABRINA A. PEREZ -- rank: 729

... insurance coverage with minimum limits of $15,000/$30,000. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). See Proformance Ins. Co. , supra , 185 N.J. at ... can satisfy the mandatory requirement by maintaining a basic policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(b). This additional policy was introduced in 1998, when, as ... in both N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. Accordingly, a carrier seeking to retroactively void coverage based upon ... minimum liability coverage and also provide for optional liability coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. To the extent that this creates an anomalous situation, it ...

docket:	a3100-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-13
status:	published
citation:	432 N.J.Super. 526 75 A.3d 1233
Document Size:	36937

12 KEVIN ROBINSON v. MICHAEL ZORN -- rank: 722

... was not obligated to comply with the Compulsory Insurance Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 to -3, which requires owners of motor vehicles registered or ... 6A-1 et seq.) or P.L. 1972, c. 197 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6B-1 et seq.) . [(Emphasis added).] The amendment added the underlined portion ... 6A-1 et seq.) or P.L. 1972, c. 197 ([ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6B-1 et seq.)." The amendment, therefore, limited the second exemption to ...

docket:	a3152-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-17
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 312 64 A.3d 571
Document Size:	48182

13 Sheila Aronberg v. Wendell Tolbert, et al. -- rank: 712

... vehicles.” Caviglia , supra , 178 N.J. at 466 (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1). Every such policy must include a form of self-insurance ...

docket:	A-9-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2011-08-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	79168

14 Caviglia v. Royal Tours of America -- rank: 700

... bodily injury, death, and property damage caused by their vehicles. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. That statute is intended to ensure that automobile accident victims ...

docket:	a-72-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-02-19
status:
citation:	178 N.J. 460
Document Size:	73987

15 Thomas DeMarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.M. -- rank: 686

... Jersey, all motor vehicle owners must maintain liability insurance coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a). Moreover, “once its insured has become responsible for ...

docket:	A-104-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-12-01
status:
citation:	219 N.J. 131 97 A.3d 663
Document Size:	148694