Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 KIYOTAKA INOUE v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 420

... director's determination of ineligibility. The Appeal Tribunal relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A), which provides that a person shall not ... of more than five percent of the equity or debt. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1) (stating that officer or five-percent owner "shall ... J.A.C. 12:17-12.1 as "consonant" with N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1), although we acknowledged, "There may be instances in ...

docket:	a4212-10
court:	appellate
decided:	2013-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19158

62 JORGE M. PEREIRA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORK FORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 420

... 1, 2009, and January 30, 2011, were invalid pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C) and, as a consequence, he was liable ... the relevant factors. [ Karins , supra , 152 N.J. at 540.] N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i) defines employment under the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(c) provides that employment shall not include, "[s ... determined that Jorge was disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(7)(C) and was required to repay all unemployment ...

docket:	a1739-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12760

63 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1504-19.opn.html -- rank: 418

... TRIAL JUDGE IGNORED CASE LAW AND THE STATUTORY PROVISION IN N.J.S.A. 43:21- 19(i)(6) TO CONCLUDE THAT . . . PLAINTIFF WAS NOT AN EMPLOYEE ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15700

64 FREDM. BURG v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and BROOKDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE -- rank: 415

... be eligible for benefits, if otherwise qualified. It also noted N.J.S.A. 43:21- 19(m)(1) defines 'unemployed' as being when a claimant is ...

docket:	a4755-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41131

65 SPECIAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, INC., Petitioner-Appellant v. BOARD OF REVIEW et al. -- rank: 411

... that Ms. Reistle was an "employee" under the ABC test, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A)(B)(C). However, the Board did not ...

docket:	a6870-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-01-10
status:	published
citation:	327 N.J.Super. 197
Document Size:	28985

66 STEVEN R. WILSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 409

... the 364 calendar days beginning when he files his claim. N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1) (defining "base year"); N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d) (defining "benefit year"). We exercise a limited role in ...

docket:	a4874-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13547

67 JAMES C. VAN SICKLE, JR. v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 409

... of the so-called "ABC test" of self-employment under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A),(B),(C). On further appeal, the Board ... all three criteria of the "ABC" test for self-employment, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A),(B),(C), none of which he claims ...

docket:	A0859-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-20
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 460 859 A.2d 716
Document Size:	26765

68 RICHARD M. TIMINSKI SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADAM\'S BAR, INC -- rank: 406

... determined that appellant was ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1), which provides, in pertinent part: An individual shall ... that appellant would not be "considered 'unemployed' as provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)." In support of his appeal to the Board ...

docket:	a1088-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19402

69 WARREN M. JENTIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 404

... wages, appellant was not an independent contractor as defined in N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6). 5 On July 31, 2012, the Board affirmed ... earn at least $7200 during the base year. 5 Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6), an independent contractor is defined as an individual ...

docket:	a0732-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20317

70 JUDITH SAMUEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PORT AUTHORITY -- rank: 402

... be "invalid" on February 9, because during the base year, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1), she had failed to accumulate twenty base weeks ...

docket:	a1501-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12678

71 CHARLES H. ROBINSON JR.,1 v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 402

... to calculate his benefit. We disagree. A-2428-18T2 2 N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1) defines the term base year to mean 'the ... benefits, Robinson earned the following income: 2 'Benefit year,' under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d), is defined as 'the 364 consecutive calendar days beginning ... first alternate base year resulted in a valid claim. Importantly, N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-5.2 ...

docket:	a2428-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10037

72 VINCENT J. GENTILE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 402

... except it determined Gentile was ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A), which provides: An individual shall be deemed ... benefits from 8/11/13 through 8/17/13 under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)." Gentile then appealed the Appeal Tribunal's decision ... the Board determined Gentile "is ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A)[.]" It is from that determination that Gentile ... s determination that Gentile's unemployment claim was invalid under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A). Affirmed. This archive is a service of ...

docket:	a4885-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-11-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13644

73 CHRISTOPHER A ANDERSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 402

... be "unemployed". N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(m)(1)(A), "[a]n individual shall be deemed 'unemployed ...

docket:	a1353-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20656

74 SHARON A. MASTERSON V. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 399

... of the wherewithal to pay full benefits to eligible employees.      N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(o) deals with an atypical but not uncommon situation, such ... employee's (petitioner's) failure to report, as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(o), the income she earned over and above her hourly ... ought to be regarded as satisfying the reporting requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(o) is inapposite. Petitioner did not make the report expressly ...

docket:	a5220-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1995-10-24
status:	published
citation:	284 N.J.Super. 561
Document Size:	9229

75 CHARLES T. WARREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 397

... completed calendar quarters immediately preceding an individual's benefit year." N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(c)(1). N.J.A.C. 12:17-5.6 ...

docket:	a5793-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20751