Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 LATOYA THOMPSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 648

... 21-5(b), and she had not actively sought work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). This appeal followed. On appeal, appellant argues she was ... benefits, appellant's failure to actively seek work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We affirm the Board of Review's determination ... 287 N.J. Super. 281 , 284 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1)). During the administrative hearing, appellant testified she was ... the record that appellant was not seeking work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), and such a determination was not arbitrary, capricious ...

docket:	a1409-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16392

62 WENDY MASSARO-JOHNSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 648

... services during the next term. The Appeal Tribunal relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). The Appeal Tribunal also determined that Massaro-Johnson ... receive unemployment benefits. Brady , supra , 152 N.J. at 218. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) provides that, with respect to teaching employees of ... noted in Charatan , supra , 200 N.J. Super. at 79, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) is " tailored to meet the unique ten month ...

docket:	a2695-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-03-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16404

63 JOHN F. SCINTO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 644

... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). For these purposes, a "week" means a "calendar ... days during [each of] these calendar weeks, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)[(1)] and N.J.S.A. 43:21-19 ... unreasonable in the determination that this conduct did not satisfy N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The statutory and regulatory scheme makes it clear ... individual's control) is not deemed available for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(3). By regulation, "[a]n individual who voluntarily takes ...

docket:	a0346-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17900

64 SAMEER DHAWAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 641

... the Deputy, finding both claims for unemployment benefits invalid under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e) and N.J.A.C. 12:16-11.2 ... while opting to receive unemployment benefits. The Tribunal relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e), which requires that an unemployed individual establish at least ...

docket:	a5924-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22931

65 WILLIAM F. ARANGUREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and OCEAN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 638

... continue to perform such services in a subsequent academic year. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). Following our review, in light of the applicable ... to 2010 academic year was September 8, 2009. Relying on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), the Appeal Tribunal determined claimant was ineligible for ... school year until his first substitute teaching assignment. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) disqualifies a claimant from the receipt of unemployment ...

docket:	a4424-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15125

66 JAMES C. VAN SICKLE, JR. v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 635

... benefits, if otherwise eligible and not otherwise disqualified. See generally N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 (eligibility conditions); N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 (disqualification ...

docket:	A0859-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-20
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 460 859 A.2d 716
Document Size:	26765

67 MOBOLAJI OSINUGA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 631

... because he was unavailable for work within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). A-1863-17T1 2 Petitioner appealed the Appeal Tribunal ... for unemployment benefits is determined by satisfying the requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 and N.J.A.C. 12:17-5.1, which ... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work . . . .' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). In turn, N.J.A.C. 12:17 ... the last assignment, he was properly disqualified for unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-15.3 ...

docket:	a1863-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10658

68 A-0KEVIN DAVIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW, MOBILE CLEANING SYSTEMS, LLC AND MARINE CONTRACTING LLC,1 May 19 2015 -- rank: 628

... provided he or she is not otherwise disqualified from benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1)(F). An individual is disqualified from benefits if ...

docket:	a3046-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19326

69 LAURA L. ODDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 625

... of Review (Board) that disqualified her from unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2) and required her to repay the benefits she ... be eligible for unemployment benefits, a person must be "unemployed." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. Unemployment benefits are not to be paid on the basis ... services in the second of such academic years or terms . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(2).] The statute has been held applicable to full ...

docket:	a4124-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15147

70 SANDRA CALDWELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KEYSKILLS LEARNING INC -- rank: 625

... she was available for work and actively seeking employment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Even when she testified at the first appeal ... work," are "available for work," and are "actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The Board concluded that Caldwell's October 2008 ... documenting her attempts to find and availability for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). She did not provide a list for the ...

docket:	a0882-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16017

71 A-0AGOSTINHO P. LIVRES v. BOARD OF REVIEW and L & L CONSULTING SERVICES LLC May 14 2015 -- rank: 622

... unemployment benefits dated May 20, 2012 was invalid pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e) and N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i ...

docket:	a0980-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14341

72 MARGARITA JOHNSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION -- rank: 618

... which found her disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), as she was not available for work. We affirm ... September 30, 2012, through January 5, 2013, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), as she was not available for work. Johnson appealed ... Eligibility for unemployment benefit is determined on a weekly basis. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 provides, in pertinent part, that an unemployed individual shall be ... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work[.]" N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Thus, our Legislature has required that benefit recipients ... Our Legislature has created certain exceptions from this requirement. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(3)-(7), (9)-(10). Our Legislature has not created ...

docket:	a4041-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13665

73 IRMA COTTON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC -- rank: 618

... this country was then expired, was unavailable for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The Division consequently directed claimant to refund the ...

docket:	a0684-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13067

74 ROBERT STIEH v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al. -- rank: 615

... to satisfy the twenty-week work requirement for eligibility. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e) (2) (A). We also recognize, as did the Board ... times the prevailing minimum wage) during his base year. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4)(B). The Board also considered other potential grounds ...

docket:	a5258-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	22862

75 ALLIED INTERIOR CONTRACTORS INC. v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 615

... November 2, 2009 holding Deirocini disqualified for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a) because she left her employment without good cause attributable ...

docket:	a5741-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24692