Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 JOY A. XHUDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW and SAFE STREETS U.S.A - -- rank: 612

... her to repay those benefits. Xhudo disputes her ineligibility under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), arguing that she was not offered full-time employment ... to part-time," she was “ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)" due to her own unavailability. Xhudo appealed the Tribunalâ ... Bd. of Review , 381   N.J. Super.   169, 172 (2005); N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). A claimant shall be disqualified for benefits "if it ...

docket:	a1726-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	21581

77 IVONNE D. OVIEDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ABB, INC. -- rank: 609

... for work, and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work . . . .' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1); Melfi v. Bd. of Rev., 336 N.J ...

docket:	a1488-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-05-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10287

78 CHARLES T. WARREN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 605

... least 1000 times the minimum wage during the base year. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(5)(B). "Base year" is defined as "the first ...

docket:	a5793-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20751

79 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2236-19.opn.html -- rank: 602

... Review finding he was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c) because he was unable to work. We affirm. We ... The tribunal found Noriega ineligible for unemployment compensation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) from July 22 through October 20, 2018, because ... 287 N.J. Super. 281, 284 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1)). The Board considered the doctor's letter and ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	9999

80 FRANK M. SIMONELLI v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 602

... in accordance with such regulations as the division may prescribe . . . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a).] The regulations promulgated by the Division require that claimants ...

docket:	A2210-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-04-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28073

81 CAROL D. FAUST v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CUSTOM BENEFIT PROGRAMS, INC -- rank: 592

... 2013 determinations. The tribunal found Faust ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-12 ... Appeal Tribunal determined Faust was ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-2 ... s finding that Faust was ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This provision provides that [a]n unemployed individual ...

docket:	a3292-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-06
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20076

82 ALAN R. WITTE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 566

... May 17, 2009, because he had been unavailable for work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), and that he must pay back the benefits ... to work and has demonstrated to be actively seeking work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). In addition, the Division emphasized this requirement for ...

docket:	a2326-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15117

83 BARRY S. ZALL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 560

... he has fulfilled the conditions imposed by subsection (e) of [ N.J.S.A. ] 43:21-4. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d).] Because Zall ... remaining requirements for unemployment benefit eligibility as set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(4) and -19(t)(2). Thus, there is no ...

docket:	a1842-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12268

84 JOSEPH A. SIMIRIGLIO, JR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 560

... A-0556-18T2 3 demonstrated to be actively seeking work.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). By statute, an individual voluntarily on vacation (as ... individual's control) is not deemed available for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(3). The Board agreed with the Appeal Tribunal that ... unreasonable in the determination that this conduct did not satisfy N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). To the extent we do not address appellant ...

docket:	a0556-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7635

85 CLAUDIO TUNDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 560

... 2016, the Board disqualified Tundo from receiving unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 4 A-0525-16T1 5(b) because of severe misconduct connected ...

docket:	a0525-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21846

86 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 550

... also available. The eligibility criteria for these benefits are intertwined. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) provides compensation to those individuals who "suffered any ...

docket:	a0132-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15949

87 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 550

... also available. The eligibility criteria for these benefits are intertwined. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) provides compensation to those individuals who "suffered any ...

docket:	a0133-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15948

88 CYNTHIA A. CORDOVA v. BOARD OF REVIEW NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 540

... July 8, 2017, because she was unavailable for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). However, the appeals examiner remanded to the Deputy ... full-time work despite its availability at her workplace. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the Board's September 14 ...

docket:	a0773-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13880

89 PETER VAN ECK v. BOARD OF REVIEW and NEWARK MORNING LEDGER CO -- rank: 540

... agency's regulations, is a statutory prerequisite to benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(a)(stating that an individual shall be eligible to receive ...

docket:	a1195-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12625

90 LESTER FUSCO v. BOARD OF EDUCATION <br -- rank: 534

... less stringent than that required to prove constructive discharge. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 to -6(b)(1). The granting of plaintiff's application ...

docket:	a3385-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-04-01
status:	published
citation:	349 N.J. Super. 455
Document Size:	19291