Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:21-5")   301 to 315 of 598 results. Run time: 0.902 seconds | Search time: 0.895 seconds    
 Page:1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 Previous 15 Next 15
301 CARLENE M. BRAVO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 434
... is disqualified from receiving benefits for one year pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g)(1) for making false or fraudulent representations, and must ...
docket: a1955-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-08-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13371
302 EDWARD T. CASSIDY, JR v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 434
... from unemployment benefits for the period in question, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g) and N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d ... of Review determined Cassidy was ineligible for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g) and liable to 5 A-0053-16T4 refund benefits ...
docket: a0053-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-02-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22176
303 A.M v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARK IV TRANSPORTATION LOGISTICS, INC -- rank: 434
... Board), disqualifying him from receiving unemployment benefits in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because he left his employment as a tractor trailer ...
docket: a0546-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-11-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19713
304 ROBERT E. BUCK v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 432
... June 27, the deputy director found Buck disqualified pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), based on his termination for cause. Buck appealed and ... v. Bd. of Review , 91 N.J. 453 , 459 (1982)). N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) (emphasis added) provides that an applicant for unemployment benefits ...
docket: a4656-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-09-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14559
305 PEDRODIBLASI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and DAVIDSON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC -- rank: 432
... Review concluding that he was disqualified for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... Therefore, [Diblasi] is disqualified as of [March 20, 2016], under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), as he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... We see no reason to disturb the Board's decision. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 provides that a person is ineligible for unemployment benefits for ... the unfortunate circumstances confronting Diblasi, the consequence is that under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) he is not entitled to unemployment benefits. Diblasi's ...
docket: a3504-16
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-07-17
status:
citation:
Document Size: 9309
306 KATHLEEN M. HILTS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 432
... was terminated from her job for simple misconduct pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. The facts ... it found Hilts had been discharged for simple misconduct under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Hilts appealed and stated in her letter to the ... its legal conclusions, the Appeal Tribunal discussed the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), which related to the disqualification of an applicant for ... severe misconduct, which imposed a lengthier period of ineligibility. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Hilts appealed again to the Board, arguing it was ...
docket: a1709-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-06-19
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 20589
307 JEFFREY A. PEREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 432
... from receiving benefits as of February 11, 2018, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). The Board also affirmed the decision of the Appeal ... disqualified for benefits as of February 11, 2018, pursuant to N.J .S.A. 43:21-5(a) and that he had to refund the benefits he ... the individual becomes reemployed and works eight weeks in employment . . . . [N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] An employee who leaves work voluntarily has the burden ...
docket: a2352-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-12-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 11342
308 WANDA NELSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW and NEWARK BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER, INC -- rank: 432
... final agency decision disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... in mind, we conclude Nelson's appeal is without merit. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that '[a]n individual shall be disqualified for ... is disqualified for benefits as of [May 27, 2018], under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), as [she] left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... is not eligible for unemployment benefits based upon requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) and the aforementioned regulations. Affirmed. 2 Nelson does not ...
docket: a0496-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-04-15
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 10725
309 ROBERT P. WALSH v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 432
... determination deeming him ineligible for unemployment benefits, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because he was discharged from his employment for gross ... his employment for gross misconduct connected with the work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The Board of Review affirmed the decision of the ...
docket: a4993-11
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-26
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 15032
310 MEKIBA DUNLAP v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE -- rank: 432
... Tribunal that she was disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... to such work and is therefore disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)[.] Dunlap thereafter appealed to the Board of Review, which ... becomes re-employed and works four weeks 1 in unemployment . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a).] An employee who has left work voluntarily has the ... no reason to disturb it. Affirmed. 1 An amendment to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), effective July 1, 2010, substituted "eight weeks" for "four ...
docket: a1716-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-02-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16850
311 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5307-18.opn.html -- rank: 430
... work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). We affirm. Carney worked at the New Jersey Department ... The Tribunal decided that Carney was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), 'as she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... should it be disturbed. Brady, 152 N.J. at 210. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) provides that '[a]n individual shall be disqualified for ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 11002
312 CAROLINA LEAL DEHAQUIZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 430
... Dehaquiz to refund benefits paid to her, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable ... Ibid. As noted, in its decision, the Board relied upon N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), which disqualifies a person for benefits [f]or the ...
docket: a2999-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-10-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14505
313 GENADIY KISHINEVSKIY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON LEARNING CORPORATION -- rank: 430
... 5649-17T1 3 false or fraudulent misrepresentation [in accordance with] N.J.S.A. 43:21- 5(g)(1).' Claimant appealed the director's determination. During an ... one-year period following March 29, 2018, as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g)(1). Claimant appealed. The Board reviewed the record before ...
docket: a5649-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-10-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 14734
314 TERESA E. BABER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 430
... Appeal Tribunal 1 that she was disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a) because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work, and under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b) because she was discharged for misconduct connected with the ... voluntarily leaving employment without good cause attributable to the work, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a), the phrase "good cause" means "cause sufficient to justify ... at 214. With respect to the work-related misconduct ground, N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b), appellant's conduct falls squarely within the definition of ...
docket: a0554-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-01-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22976
315 LISA W. WEEMS v. BOARD OF REVIEW,DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 430
... from September 27, 2009, through November 7, 2009, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). The pro se brief filed by Weems is devoid ... be disqualified for benefits . . . for misconduct connected with the work . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(b). Although the Act does not define "misconduct connected with ...
docket: a2911-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-01-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18810
 Page:1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!