Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA v. BOARD OF REVIEW,  -- rank: 491

... of the Tribunal hearing date but "simply forgot" to attend. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) directs that: The parties shall be duly notified of ...

docket:	a4701-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17327

107 SALVADOR MURILLO - v. BOARD OF REVIEW and HALKA NURSERIES, INC - -- rank: 487

... file a challenge within the ten-day deadline set by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) but waited until it experienced a change in ...

docket:	a0129-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29798

108 LAUREN E. KUEHL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HORTICULTURE PLANT SERVICES, INC -- rank: 487

... of the Appeals Tribunal's decision. We affirm. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), the decision of the Appeals Tribunal is deemed to ... of relaxing or extending the ten-day deadline established under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). In this light, we affirm the decision of the ...

docket:	a0697-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8623

109 TANE BOGDANOSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and JUPITER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -- rank: 484

... Hence, the claimant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On appeal, claimant argues that as English is ... J. Turnpike Auth. , 137 N.J. 8 , 27 (1994)). Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), a claimant has ten calendar days after the ...

docket:	a3642-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13494

110 HENRY J. KOCH Claimant- v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and ENTEL SYSTEMS, INC - -- rank: 477

... employer chose not to participate in the Board's hearing. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) sets forth the procedure for appeals of an ...

docket:	a1975-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23889

111 MARY C. SULLIVAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, et al. -- rank: 474

... to administer benefits under the criteria established by law . See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) . T he Board's duty is to "preserve the ...

docket:	a3661-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31047

112 BARRY S. ZALL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 474

... claim for benefits made in accordance with subsection (a) of [ N.J.S.A. ] 43:21-6 shall be deemed to be a "valid claim" for the ...

docket:	a1842-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12268

113 HONOREE M. GIBNEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KELLY SERVICES, INC -- rank: 474

... 4.1(h). The ten-day statutory time for appeal, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), has been held to be jurisdictional. Lowden v ...

docket:	a2280-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	21406

114 JORGE E. ALVAREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW and ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE, INC -- rank: 470

... good cause for the late appeal and that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the merits ... solely addressed to the substantive merits of the adverse determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) states in pertinent part: 1 The parties shall be ...

docket:	a2761-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11871

115 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/000172-17opn.opn.html -- rank: 446

... of the benefits she received. Id. at 87. See also N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). An untimely administrative appeal was filed with the ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25809

116 DEANNA M. ALSTON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC -- rank: 429

... periods explained in the Request for Refund are statutory. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) ('Unless the claimant or any interested party, within ...

docket:	a4604-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10505

117 BRUCE A. CYMANSKI v. BOARD OF REVIEW, and SHORELINE GRADING AND EXCAVATING INC -- rank: 429

... has earned at least six times his weekly benefit rate. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 BASED ON THE DATES SHOWN ON DOCUMENTS, 2a, 3a, 4a ... 6b, 7a, 8a, 8b, 9a, 9b, 10a, AND 11a. THEREFORE N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 DOES NOT APPLY, AND SHOULD NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DENIAL ...

docket:	a6679-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-09-25
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	22151

118 JOSEPH REGINA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND PFISTER MAINTENANCE CORP., INC. -- rank: 404

... until more than three months after the calculation. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), an appeal must be filed within ten days ...

docket:	a0874-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13472

119 AMANDA A. HOLDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 397

... administrative appeal of the ineligibility determination as untimely, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Board of Review upheld that untimeliness ruling ...

docket:	a4036-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12734

120 DINA R. EVANGELISTA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 387

... forth twice in the determination Evangelista received, is governed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The definition of a good cause exception to ...

docket:	a5066-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15097