Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 BELINDA MENDEZ-AZZOLLINI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 674

... capricious, or unreasonable.' Ibid. A-1150-17T3 4 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), an Appeal Tribunal's decision 'shall be deemed to ... which could not have been reasonably foreseen or prevented. 3 N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) allows appeals to the Board by interested parties and ... a claim for benefits, must notify the claimant's employer. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b). That notice requires the 'employer to furnish such information ...

docket:	a1150-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16818

47 JAMIE L. COHEN v. BOARD OF REVIEW and DOLCE VITA INTIMATES, LLC -- rank: 667

... of the deputy's determination within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) and, because no good cause had been shown ... appeal had not been filed within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) and appellant failed to show good cause for ... claims examiner on an application for benefits is governed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which states: Unless the claimant or any interested ... timely file an appeal of the deputy's determination under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) or establish good cause excusing that untimely appeal ...

docket:	a4338-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16826

48 LOIS A. SPRAGGINS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 660

... had not filed her appeal within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The examiner wrote that while Spraggins did not ... the appeal was not filed within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) and Spraggins had not shown good cause for ... claims examiner on an application for benefits is governed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which states: Unless the claimant or any interested ... did not file her appeal within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). As noted, the deputy's determination on her ...

docket:	a1023-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18954

49 LARISA SLUTSKAYA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HHCH HEALTH CARE, INC -- rank: 657

... of benefits by Deputy J. Hanley was March 9, 2010. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires that claimant file any appeal within seven ... did not understand what she needed to do to file. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides that an appeal must be filed within ...

docket:	a1588-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27005

50 ROBERT P. WALSH v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 653

... initial determination, in default of which the decision becomes final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The filing deadline is not jurisdictional. Rivera v ...

docket:	a4993-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-26
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	15032

51 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 653

... a). Tatem did not appeal and that determination became final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On September 9, 2007, Tatem was "rehired" by ... s denial of unemployment benefits and that decision became final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). After a brief resumption of employment, Tatem submitted ...

docket:	a0132-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15949

52 MAGDOULEN A. SAWIRES VS. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. -- rank: 653

... agency decision with respect to an application for unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(h). That final agency decision may be appealed to this ...

docket:	a0071-23
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-05-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16947

53 DAVID L. TATEM v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 653

... a). Tatem did not appeal and that determination became final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On September 9, 2007, Tatem was "rehired" by ... s denial of unemployment benefits and that decision became final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). After a brief resumption of employment, Tatem submitted ...

docket:	a0133-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15948

54 GEORGE SPADEA, SR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC -- rank: 650

... was dismissed because it was not timely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) which provides in part: Unless the claimant or ... forth explicit appeal-procedure instructions, including the time constraints of N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the 'good A-0576-19 4 cause' extension ... exclusively by the statute.'). The time periods set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 have been recognized as short but fair. Id. at 470 ...

docket:	a0576-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15362

55 FRANKLYN D. VEGA-CRUZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 650

... had] not been shown for the appeal being filed late." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On April 13, 2012, appellant sent a letter ... from the date of mailing of the Appeal Tribunal decision ( N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c))" and appellant did not show good cause for the ... without good cause. We disagree with the Board's conclusion. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) provides: Unless such appeal is withdrawn, an appeal tribunal ... exception to the twenty-day period for filing appeals under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). The Board thereafter promulgated a regulation, N.J.A ...

docket:	a2577-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-01-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22021

56 HILLARY HEIDEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 650

... Board acted within its authority. The Board is authorized by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) to 'affirm, modify or set aside any decision of ...

docket:	a0694-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25722

57 KEONA WRIGHT v. BOARD OF REVIEW NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CARRIER CLINIC -- rank: 647

... are not appealed become decisions of the Board of Review. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Consequently, the appeal tribunals are creatures of the Board ...

docket:	a0036-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-12
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27215

58 NATASHA R. SEARLES v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 633

... the Board of Review (Board) dismissing her appeal as untimely, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Our examination of the record satisfies us that the ... that good cause was not shown for such late filing, N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). It is from that decision that Searles appeals. The ... from a decision by the Appeal Tribunal is prescribed by N.J.S.A . 43:21-6(c), which states in pertinent part: The parties shall be ... Searles' appeal was not filed within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A . 43:21-6(c), and Searles failed to establish good cause for her ...

docket:	a5587-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12908

59 SUREKHABEN M. MODI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and AAA PACKAGING INC -- rank: 633

... within ten days of mailing, or seven days of receipt. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). An appeal to the Board of Review of ... s decision shall be final, and deemed a Board decision. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Our Supreme Court has recognized that modern notions of ...

docket:	a2213-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	28301

60 BOROUGH OF RINGWOOD v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BARBARA FICKEN -- rank: 622

... Board cogently and convincingly explains its rationale for the rejection. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e); Ryan v. Brown , 279 N.J. Super. 648 , 651 ...

docket:	a1244-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37416