Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 JAMES K. REILLY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 581

... finding that PVSC's appeal was timely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Next, the examiner applied the benefit reduction provision ...

docket:	a0911-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18931

77 RICHARD A. POLINE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 574

... appeal from the determination of the director is prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which states in pertinent part: Unless the claimant ...

docket:	a3576-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36561

78 RICHARD W. WEASE v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 570

... The Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal for the following reasons: N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides that an appeal must be filed within ... within seven days of the receipt of the initial determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The appeal period can be extended for good ...

docket:	a1430-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12485

79 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2146-18.opn.html -- rank: 570

... to dismiss appellant's application for relief as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). We affirm. On March 26, 2017, appellant filed ... date the notice was mailed to her last-known address. N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). A-2146-18T3 2 Appellant appealed the Director ... cause to warrant the relaxation of the time restrictions in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Appeal Tribunal noted that pursuant to N ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	7433

80 LEANNE LEBLANC v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 570

... determinations with respect to . . . claims for benefits . . . shall be presented . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(f). N.J.A.C. 1:12 applies to unemployment ... notice that the Board hereby exercises its authority pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) to take jurisdiction over any and all issues arising ...

docket:	a5054-10
court:	appellate
decided:	2013-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26314

81 MARY F. COOMBE v. BOARD OF REVIEW and SUN NATIONAL BANK -- rank: 567

... finding the appeal had been properly dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and Coombe had not shown good cause for ... the force and effect of law." Id. at 469-70. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) lists the procedure to claim unemployment compensation benefits ... after the date of notification or mailing of such decision . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c).] The time for appeal may be extended upon a ...

docket:	a1963-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	15172

82 DILLON BOVA PAQUIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED STATES NAVY -- rank: 564

... that Paquin's appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). We have considered the parties' arguments in light ... appeal because he "was busy with school." He cited to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which requires that appeals be filed within ten ... Review , 78 N.J. Super. 467 , 469 (App. Div. 1963). N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires that an appeal from initial determination be ...

docket:	a0893-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18971

83 JUDITH SAMUEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PORT AUTHORITY -- rank: 564

... it was "not filed within" the time limits contained in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and "good cause ha[d] not been shown ... it be disturbed. Brady , supra , 152 N.J. at 210. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides that unless the claimant files an appeal ...

docket:	a1501-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12678

84 KRISTEN REEDY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and REEDY INTERNATIONAL CORP -- rank: 557

... it was filed beyond the twenty-day period established in N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(c) and good cause was not shown for the late ... agency decision with respect to an application for unemployment compensation. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(h). Reedy has not pursued an appeal to the Board ...

docket:	a4575-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9006

85 ROBERT H. STILL v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 557

... Board was not required to make any additional findings. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) (stating that the Board may, in part, "affirm, modify ...

docket:	a4310-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	66517

86 KEVIN MAGUIRE v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 557

... met the time limitations for filing an appeal established by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and that he had failed to show good ...

docket:	a5503-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-29
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33918

87 MARLENE DECHERT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 553

... examiner must be filed within seven calendar days after delivery. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Delta received the initial decision on June 30 ...

docket:	a3264-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14010

88 RAYMOND RHODES v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 543

... constitutes good cause for filing a late appeal. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) provides that: an appeal tribunal, after affording the parties ...

docket:	a0633-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12135

89 WHITNEY ALLEN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LAKERIDGE, AN INDEPENDENT AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, LLC -- rank: 543

... complied with the deadline to file an appeal specified in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and, moreover, that Allen had not established 'good ...

docket:	a0562-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11327

90 JOSEPH A. MANZI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ASBURY PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 539

... Tribunal was filed beyond the ten day period permitted by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). We affirm. Claimant filed a claim for unemployment ... Appeal Tribunal by letter postmarked July 15, 2010. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the appeal should have been filed within seven ... the Board held that claimant did not demonstrate good cause. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires that a claimant file his appeal to ...

docket:	a3879-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16016