Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 RENEE A. JURATA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 1000

... we recognized that even if the spousal services were exempt, " N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2) expressly provides that an 'employing unit for which ... but whose husband failed to file the written election under N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2), could receive disability benefits, notwithstanding N.J.S ... husband-employer's failure to file the written election under N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2) as a "purely ministerial act whose omission would ... in that case, the Division amended its regulations, enacted under N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2), to provide that: (a) An employing unit desiring ... emphasis added).] Pursuant to the current statutory and regulatory scheme, N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2) permits "an employing unit," such as Tropical Pools ...

docket:	a2784-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21674

2 DIANE BRUYNELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BRUYNELL ELECTRIC, L.L.C -- rank: 902

... C). She contends, however, that the Board failed to consider N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2), which permits an employer to elect coverage for ... taxes should be considered "substantial compliance with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2)." Bruynell contends that the Board's denial of ... but whose husband failed to file the written election under N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2), might still be eligible for benefits notwithstanding N ... b), the regulation governing applications for elections of coverage under N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2), "to clarify that an employer shall not elect ... elections of coverage be made by written application, consistent with N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2) . . . . [ 31 N.J.R. 4218 (a) (Dec. 20 ...

docket:	a0861-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17620

3 DOREEN L. SIMON v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 816

... stated, 'Division records designate the above named employer with statute N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2),' which pertains to an otherwise exempt employer's ...

docket:	a1972-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41194

4 KAREN PALITO VS BOARD OF REVIEW & DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 604

... under R.C. 4141.01(A)(5) [the counterpart of N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(b)(2)].         [ Id. at 757-758.] [Footnotes omitted.]     New Jersey ...

docket:	a5352-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-06-08
status:	published
citation:	312 N.J.Super. 157
Document Size:	10933

5 TODD R. LEATHERMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SEAPORT BUILDERS LLC, -- rank: 506

... purposes of the unemployment compensation law. However, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-8(c)(2) and N.J.A.C. 12:16-14 ...

docket:	a5275-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	15401