Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:14b-10")   106 to 120 of 301 results. Run time: 0.871 seconds | Search time: 0.864 seconds    
 Page:1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 21 Previous 15 Next 15
106 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES BELLAMY -- rank: 608
... for reconsideration fell outside the time limitation set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). This contention lacks merit. The forty-five day window, set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c), delineates the time frame for an agency head to ...
docket: a2730-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-06-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41226
107 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF PATRICK O. BAMGBOYE D.D.S License No 22DI02068800 TO PRACTICE DENTISTRY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 605
... knowledge . . . may be utilized in the valuation of the evidence[.]" N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(b). On the other hand, when the Board acts in ...
docket: a2372-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-31
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34672
108 IN THE MATTER OF THE XANADU PROJECT AT THE MEADOWLANDS COMPLEX -- rank: 605
... an ALJ holds a trial-like hearing on the matter. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10. At the close of the hearing, the ALJ issues a ... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c).] We may review the agency head's decision, and ...
docket: a2702-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-06
status: Published
citation: 415 N.J. Super. 179 1 A.3d 747
Document Size: 131788
109 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF STEVEN C. BRIGHAM, M.D LICENSE NO. MA05106800 TO PRACTICE MEDICINE AND SURGERY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 605
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished.) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not 'constitute precedent or be binding upon any court.' Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case ...
docket: a1944-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-09-07
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 174844
110 DON TIGER VS. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION -- rank: 605
... a review of the principles governing our analysis. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c): A-2653-22 15 All hearings of a State ... 368 N.J. Super. 527, 534 (App. Div. 2004) (citing N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c); S.D. v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Health Servs ... satisfactorily conducted her review of the ALJ's recommendation under N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). The Executive Director rejected the ALJ's findings of ...
docket: a2653-22
court: appellate
decided: 2024-06-28
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36760
111 C.A v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES - -- rank: 602
... court proceedings do not strictly apply to administrative hearings. See N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10; N.J.A.C. 1:1-15.1 to -15 ...
docket: a3995-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-01-07
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21445
112 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3863-18.opn.html -- rank: 602
... petitioners' constrained assertions concerning the ALJ's credibility findings. Citing N.J.S.A. 52:14B- 10(c), the Commissioner 'f[ound] no basis in the record ... N.J. Super. 480, 485 (App. Div. 2002); see also N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). We briefly review the pertinent statutory and regulatory scheme ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25601
113 IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL PICARIELLO COUNTY OF HUDSON -- rank: 599
... the record to prove a violation of an administrative regulation. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(a)(C); In re Taylor , supra , 158 N.J. at ...
docket: a3270-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52693
114 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF JOHN G. COSTINO, JR D.O. -- rank: 597
... reject, or modify that decision before issuing its final decision. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c); N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.6. An ... unless such findings are arbitrary or unsupported by the record. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). The Board also has the discretion to remand the ...
docket: a2348-09
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-10-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 78370
115 DAVID A. HILL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN\'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM -- rank: 594
... supported by sufficient, competent, and credible evidence in the record. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c).] At the outset, the Board had accepted the factual ...
docket: a4069-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-10-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36204
116 IN THE MATTER OF KHADIHHA BLACKSON JOHN GERMINO, PETER WICKMAN, JEFFREY MERKEL AND ALBERT COSTON -- rank: 591
... raise the following issues for our consideration: POINT ONE: UNDER N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c), THE INITIAL DECISION OF THE [ALJ] WAS DEEMED ADOPTED ... layoffs, became the Board's final decision by operation of N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). The statute provides that an ALJ's recommended decision ... conclude that, in these circumstances, the "deemed adopted" provision in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) does not apply and the ALJ's initial decision ... was no basis to apply the "deemed adopted" provision of N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) because the agency had "signaled its intentions to reject ... that case, we held that the "deemed adopted" provision in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) did not apply because the agency had taken official ...
docket: a4513-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-12
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 21663
117 IN THE MATTER OF KHADIHHA BLACKSON JOHN GERMINO, PETER WICKMAN, JEFFREY MERKEL AND ALBERT COSTON -- rank: 591
... raise the following issues for our consideration: POINT ONE: UNDER N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c), THE INITIAL DECISION OF THE [ALJ] WAS DEEMED ADOPTED ... layoffs, became the Board's final decision by operation of N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). The statute provides that an ALJ's recommended decision ... conclude that, in these circumstances, the "deemed adopted" provision in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) does not apply and the ALJ's initial decision ... was no basis to apply the "deemed adopted" provision of N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) because the agency had "signaled its intentions to reject ... that case, we held that the "deemed adopted" provision in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) did not apply because the agency had taken official ...
docket: a1162-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22279
118 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE UPPER FREEHOLD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT VS STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 588
... an initial decision of the customary depth and detail. See N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10. The Commission, also governed by general precepts of fairness and ... reject or modify it for good reason adequately articulated. See N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(d). In the event the Board is aggrieved by the ...
docket: a2156-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-08-27
status: published
citation: 314 N.J.Super. 486
Document Size: 23851
119 R.A - v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES -- rank: 588
... at 587-88. In fact, subsequent to the enactment of N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c), an administrative agency may no longer "sift through the ...
docket: a4872-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2010-11-19
status:
citation:
Document Size: 20867
120 S.G v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND - -- rank: 588
... J. Super. 243, 255-56 (App. Div. 1979)). But see N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c) (requiring the Board to 'state clearly the reasons for ... 571, 584 (App. Div. 2014) (second alteration in original) (quoting N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c)). But, 'the [ultimate] choice of accepting or rejecting the ... Amends. to Ne., 435 N.J. Super. at 584 (quoting N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c)). In the matter under review, 'the Board rejected the ...
docket: a3834-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-12-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 43578
 Page:1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 21 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!