Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 DOUGLASMARTIN v. BANK OF AMERICA -- rank: 642

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under this act . . . .' N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. A CFA claim brought by a consumer 'requires proof of ... fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit.'' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, an ... In contrast to common law fraud, the causation element of N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 is not 'the equivalent of reliance.' Dugan, 231 N.J ... nexus requirement.' Bosland, 197 N.J. at 557-58 (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19). However, contractual privity is not required to bring a CFA ... by the [CFA], and hence they have no claim under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. 16 A-2128-15T4 [Id. at 641.] Similarly, in O ...

docket:	a2128-15
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-30
status:
citation:
Document Size:	66022

32 MALEK SAADEH v. MAJESTIC TOWING TRANSPORT, INC -- rank: 637

... sought treble damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Defendants filed a contesting answer asserting various affirmative defenses, including ... attorney services pursuant to Rule 4:42-9(b) and N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 to support his request for counsel fees. In the certification ... appropriate legal or equitable relief' as determined by the court. N.J.S.A. 56:8- 19. As our Supreme Court has explained, 'an award of treble damages and attorneys' fees is mandatory under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 if a consumer-fraud plaintiff proves both an unlawful practice ... amount of reasonable attorneys' fees to be awarded pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 . . . is within the sound discretion of the trial court, guided ...

docket:	a2772-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36460

33 Roxanne Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors -- rank: 637

... person in interest. [ L. 1971 c. 247 § 7, codified at N.J.S.A. 56:8-19] Then, in 1975, the Legislature further amended the Act to ... Act, injured parties may recover three times their ascertainable damages. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The Comparative Negligence Act enables the trier of fact to ... limited only to "ascertainable loss of monies or property." (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (emphasis added)] One reading of the Act is that a ...

docket:	a-75-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-04-15
status:
citation:	148 N.J. 582
Document Size:	96873

34 ANELLO FENCE, LLC v. SAM PORFIDO -- rank: 634

... reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit.' N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. These two remedies, treble damages and attorney's fees, are ... of attorney’s fees for both plaintiffs and counterclaimants. See N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (“Any person who suffers any ascertainable loss . . . as a ... fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit' pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The denial of defendant's application for fees and costs ...

docket:	a0940-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45942

35 THOMAS GALLI v. KEY MOTORCARS, LLC -- rank: 632

... reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (emphasis added).] The purpose of these remedies is "not only ...

docket:	a3243-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48542

36 Melissa Lee v. Carter-Reed Company, L.L.C. -- rank: 621

... of the use or employment” of the unlawful practice. See N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. 10 A consumer who proves (1) an unlawful practice, (2 ... and/or equitable relief, treble damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. An unlawful practice, as defined under the CFA, is â ... ascertainable loss “as a result of” the unlawful practice. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19; see also Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc. , 110 N ... an ascertainable loss causally related to that alleged unlawful practice, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Bosland , supra , 197 N.J. at 557. No one disputes ...

docket:	a-38-09
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2010-09-29
status:
citation:	203 N.J. 496 4 A.3d 561
Document Size:	118944

37 Hardwicke v. American Boychoir School -- rank: 619

Original MSWord Version This case can also be found at *CITE_PENDING*. SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court ...

docket:	a-17-04
court:
decided:	2006-08-08
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	190776

38 Lemelledo v. Beneficial Mangement Corp. of America -- rank: 619

... treble damages for violations, whether in good faith or otherwise, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The Attorney General enforces the CFA through the Division of ...

docket:	a-107-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-07-03
status:
citation:	146 N.J. 561
Document Size:	51071

39 BRYAN J. VOGEL v. RIDGE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT LLC -- rank: 616

... for each such violation to recover damages, as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. See Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc., 197 N.J. 543 ...

docket:	a2402-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12539

40 JOHN McDARBY v. MERCK & CO., INC. -- rank: 613

Original Wordprocessor Version This case can also be found at 401 N.J.Super. 10 or 949 A.2d 223. (NOTE: The status of this decision is Published .) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0076-07T1 A ...

docket:	A0077-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-05-29
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 10 949 A.2d 223
Document Size:	256363

41 JOHN McDARBY v. MERCK & CO., INC. -- rank: 613

Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0076-07T1 A-0077-07T1 J APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION May 29, 2008 APPELLATE DIVISION OHN McDARBY and IRMA McDARBY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. MERCK & CO., INC ...

docket:	A0076-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-05-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	249479

42 JEANNE C. LEMELLEDO V. BENEFICIAL MANAGEMENT CORP. -- rank: 613

... voiding the contract, as provided under the Consumer Loan Act. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 provides: "In any action under this section the court shall ... award threefold the damages sustained by any person in interest." N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (emphasis added). As we held in Cybul v. Atrium Palace ...

docket:	a6639-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-04-19
status:	published
citation:	289 N.J.Super. 489
Document Size:	31699

43 TRICO EQUIPMENT, INC v. ELLSEE CONSTRUCTION CO., L.L.C. -- rank: 613

... concerning whether Ellsee proved an "ascertainable loss" in accordance with N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 and the case law interpreting that element of a CFA ...

docket:	a4130-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45096

44 Lyle Real v. Radir Wheels, Inc. and Richard Conklin -- rank: 611

... trial court’s decision and entry of judgment. 4 See N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (“Any person who suffers any ascertainable loss of moneys ... Roebuck & Co. , 138 N.J. 2, 22 (1994)). 5 See N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (providing that, in CFA cases, “the court shall . . . award ...

docket:	a-26-08
court:
decided:	2009-04-08
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 511
Document Size:	73657

45 NICOLE PELLEGRINO MULLER v. FRED ALLEN BUILDERS -- rank: 608

... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under this act.' N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. 'Thus, to state a claim under the CFA, a plaintiff ... reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit. ' N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. 'An 'unlawful practice' contravening the CFA may arise from (1 ... unlawful practice to recover treble damages under the CFA (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19)). Nor are they entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit against Sands under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. See Furst, 182 N.J. at 21 (prevailing plaintiff is ...

docket:	a0554-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29260