Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 BARBARA BECK v. JASON GOMEZ, trading as Heat Wave Pools and VIKING POOLS NORTHEAST, INC. -- rank: 585

... fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Because the judge's findings on damages and ascertainable loss ... entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Accordingly, we remand for a determination of the amount. The ... denied Beck's request for fees and costs pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 on the ground that Beck and her husband were aware ... fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. A plaintiff who establishes a violation of the CFA is ... of the wisdom of an award of fees required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 is for the Legislature. As we noted in Branigan v ... the CFA. The "amount" of the fee recoverable pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 "is within the sound discretion of the trial court, ...

docket:	A1440-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-11-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49309

62 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5381-16.opn.html -- rank: 585

... of consumers. N.J.S.A. 56:12-17 (TCCWNA); N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (CFA). The TCCWNA applies to contracts, warranties, notices, and signs ... 16T3 5 2, to bring an action in Superior Court. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. 'To proceed with a private cause of action under the ... proceed with a private right of action under the CFA. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. In Mellet v. Aquasid, LLC, 452 N.J. Super. 23 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35958

63 ANDREW KAPLAN v. WHOLESALE AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY CO. -- rank: 585

... provision of the MMWA because we found no damages ensued. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 sets forth the requirements for a private cause of action ... trebled, the customer could also recover attorneys' fees pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Id. at 89-90. We are not convinced that N ...

docket:	a2182-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	149590

64 JOSEPH DIRENZO v. STEVEN KATCHEN -- rank: 582

... against "a [licensed] real estate broker, broker-salesperson or salesperson," N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.1, and concluding Katchen was such a licensed professional, the motion judge quoted N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.1 in denying Katchen's motion without prejudice: [I]n ... the exception to the learned professional rule set out in N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.1." The judge also rejected Brooks' argument that he served ... the fact that Brooks signed as such on numerous documents. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 provides a remedy to "[a]ny person who suffers any ... C. , 203 N.J. 496 , 522 (2010) (citations omitted) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19). Here, applying the indulgent standards under Rule 4:37-2 ...

docket:	a0329-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53769

65 BAYSIDE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH JEEP EAGLE, INC. v. ELIZABETH MA & DAVID MA -- rank: 582

... court's fee award, which we find to be reasonable. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Indeed, it is clear that the three purposes of the ... any method, act, or practice declared unlawful under this act . . . ." N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. The "plain language of the Act unmistakably makes a claim ...

docket:	a3575-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-05-26
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	91206

66 ALEX FERNANDES et al. v. SUSAN NAVAS t/a G&S GENERAL CONTRACTING, PELCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. -- rank: 580

... had violated the CFA and awarding plaintiffs treble damages under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 in the amount of $360,000, representing three times the ... the level of "unlawful practices" prohibited by the CFA. Under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19, "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss of moneys ... damages sustained . . . ." An award of treble damages "is mandatory under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 if a consumer-fraud plaintiff proves both an unlawful practice ...

docket:	A2792-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59269

67 Elizabeth Mason v. City of Hoboken -- rank: 580

... J.S.A. 34:19-5(e) (employer-retaliatory claims); N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (consumer-fraud actions); N.J.S.A. 56:9-12a ...

docket:	a-22-07
court:
decided:	2008-07-22
status:
citation:	196 N.J. 51
Document Size:	106239

68 PRINCETOM HEALTHCARE SYSTEM v. NETSMART NEW YORK INC -- rank: 580

... a private cause of action for that alleged CFA violation. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. A party who prevails in such an action is entitled ...

docket:	a3533-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-21
status:	published
citation:	422 N.J. Super. 467 29 A.3d 361
Document Size:	25226

69 AMIEL DABUSH, et al. v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, f/k/a MERCEDES-BENZ USA, INC. -- rank: 580

... court applied the wrong legal standard for ascertainable loss under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 by requiring him to show: (1) the existence of a ... of the alleged violation of the CFA, as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. This ruling was memorialized in an order of July 16 ... personal," as a result of the defendant's unlawful conduct. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. "[T]o have standing under the Act a private party ... 243 (emphasis added).] In defining the elusive term "ascertainable loss," N.J.S.A. 56:8-19, the Court stated, "[t]o give effect to the legislative ...

docket:	A0970-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-05-26
status:	published
citation:	378 N.J. Super. 105 874 A.2d 111
Document Size:	84365

70 MARY FOURTE v. CHRYSLER CAPITAL -- rank: 577

... Co., 138 N.J. 2, 16 (1994)). 'To that end, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 prescribes a cause of action on behalf of '[a]ny ... declared unlawful under this act.'' Ibid. (alteration in original) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-19). N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 identifies the type ...

docket:	a1981-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33485

71 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD v. EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION -- rank: 575

... N.J. at 21 (plaintiff sought reasonable attorneys' fees under N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 in connection with his action under Consumer Fraud Act, N ...

docket:	a2490-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-10
status:	published
citation:	406 N.J.Super. 110 966 A.2d 108
Document Size:	70505

72 PATRICIA CZMYR v. AVALANCHE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, INC. -- rank: 575

... reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.] In addition to treble damages for any "ascertainable loss," the ... Sales, Inc. , 110 N.J. 464 , 473 (1988)); see also N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 (stating that "ascertainable loss" must occur "as a result" of ...

docket:	a1674-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39553

73 TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. -- rank: 569

... Inc. , 347 N.J. Super. 481 , 492 (App. Div. 2002); N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. "The consumer fraud statute is aimed at promoting truth and ...

docket:	a0570-11 a0570-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-10 2014-03-10
status:	unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	110278

74 ROBERT HENRY, JR., et al. v. SOMERTIME POOL & SPA SERVICE, INC. -- rank: 567

... Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. In post-trial motions, Judge Michael Brooke Fisher awarded plaintiffs ... damages" that must be trebled as limited to "ascertainable loss." N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.      Here, defendant has not appealed and is not challenging the ... reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and reasonable costs of suit." N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. But a court may award only those attorneys' fees that ...

docket:	A1179-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16858

75 CANDACE M. SABO, RICHARD WM. SABO, JAY M. SABO, et al. v. CAREN M. SABO -- rank: 564

... the refund amount of $38,571; legal fees pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-19 in the amount of $31,413.73; and pre-judgment ... not suffered an ascertainable loss of monies as intended by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19." We disagree. The CFA was enacted to protect the consumer ... ascertainable loss," and that the defendant committed an unlawful practice. N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. To prove a private claim under the CFA, a "plaintiff ... caused by the misrepresentations of the Association as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. Although there may be some incidents where a plaintiff, having ...

docket:	a3378-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-02-20
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	35908