Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 56:8-2")   61 to 75 of 370 results. Run time: 0.875 seconds | Search time: 0.868 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
61 ROTIMI AZU OWOH v. JASON SENA -- rank: 617
... or real estate . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 'Sale' is defined to 'include any sale, rental or distribution ...
docket: a0035-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-01-27
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31132
62 Janell Goffe v. Foulke Management Corp. -- rank: 617
... issue, in both cases, regarding the import of compliance with N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 of the CFA, which requires a seller to provide ... State has considered “the effect of a violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22” on the enforceability of a consumer agreement; however, the ... copies of the documents to plaintiffs in compliance with 18 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22 “is a question of disputed fact” that must ... plaintiffs copies of the contracts they signed, in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22, should be decided by the arbitrator.10 Under these ... including the question of remedy for any alleged violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.22. In the same vein, plaintiffs’ claims that they rescinded ...
docket: a-3-4-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-06-05
status:
citation:
Document Size: 70285
63 SCOTT DE POMPE v. WEICHERT REALTORS -- rank: 612
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] The CFA was amended in January 1976 to ... Neveroski and in the light of the 1975 amendment of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, the scope of the Act has been gradually broadened in ... 13 (1997), found Weichert liable under the CFA, holding that N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 makes a New Jersey real estate broker strictly liable for ...
docket: a4912-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32285
64 URGESH GUPTA v. ASHA ENTERPRISES L.L.C. -- rank: 612
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] To make out a prima facie case under the CFA ... and usage unless it conforms to such definition and standard. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.10.] We disagree with the determination of the motion judge ... evidence of misrepresentations by Moghul Express's employees under either N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 or N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.10. In particular, we note plaintiffs' allegations that they were ...
docket: a3059-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-18
status: published
citation: 422 N.J. Super. 136 27 A.3d 953
Document Size: 53898
65 BJ AMERICA ELECTRIC, LLC v. BMW NORTH AMERICA, LLC and PARK AVENUE BMW -- rank: 610
... O'Neill, 217 N.J. 99, 121-22 (2014) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). It requires 'fraudulent, deceptive or other similar kind of selling ...
docket: a2517-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41642
66 All The Way Towing, LLC v. Bucks County International, Inc. -- rank: 608
... connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise.” N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. The CFA defines “merchandise” to “include any objects ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added).] Our inquiry centers on the meaning of the ... d), and the word “person,” as used in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, refers to not only the person who engages in an ... also the person who is the victim of such practice, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (referencing practice as unlawful “whether or not any person ...
docket: a-66-67-17
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-01-24
status:
citation:
Document Size: 49917
67 FLEMING RUVOLDT PLLC v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED -- rank: 608
... Carter-Reed Co., 203 N.J. 496, 521 (2010) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, 8-19). 'An 'unlawful practice' contravening the CFA may arise ... subsequent performance of' an individual involved in such a transaction. N.J.S.A. 56:8- -2. Here, plaintiff claims it alleged 'a repeated and factually specific ...
docket: a2009-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-09-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 74841
68 ROBERT WILSON, Individually et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 608
... constitute a violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 et seq. More particularly, the complaint identified the following specific ... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In 1971, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 was amended to add "unconscionable commercial practice" to the list ...
docket: A0943-03
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-06-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 123832
69 FINDERNE MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC. v. JAMES W. BARRETT -- rank: 606
... or damaged thereby is declared to be an unlawful practice . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] "[T]he legislative concern was over sharp practices and dealings ... sale or advertisement of . . . real estate" to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. During the trial, Barrett's counsel at times argued he ...
docket: a1057-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-09-09
status: published
citation: 402 N.J.Super. 546 955 A.2d 940
Document Size: 146641
70 SHATINA D. SUAREZ v. EASTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE -- rank: 603
... Corp. , 207 N.J. 557 , 576 (2011). In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 defines an unlawful practice under the CFA as follows: The ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby[.]" N.J.S.A. 56:8-2; Gonzalez , supra , 207 N.J. at 576-77; see also ...
docket: a2705-10
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-08-23
status: published
citation: 428 N.J.Super. 10 50 A.3d 75
Document Size: 80886
71 JEFFREY S. JACOBS v. MARK LINDSAY AND SON PLUMBING HEATING, INC. -- rank: 601
... She found defendants engaged in an unconscionable commercial practice under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, when they filed a criminal complaint against plaintiff as means ...
docket: a3854-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-20
status: Published
citation: 458 N.J.Super. 194 203 A.3d 952
Document Size: 43953
72 GARY AND BETH PROBOLA v. LONG & FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC -- rank: 601
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] See also Lemelledo v. Benefit Mgmt. Corp. , 150 N.J ... N.J. Super. at 533, 544 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). A real estate broker's "affirmative misrepresentation of material fact ... the purchaser." Ibid. (citation omitted). Consequently, "the clear language of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, . . . makes a real estate broker strictly liable for any material ...
docket: a3923-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-01-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53621
73 TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. -- rank: 601
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] All violations of the CFA that result in an ascertainable ...
docket: a0570-11 a0570-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-10 2014-03-10
status: unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 110278
74 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. SILVANA SOTILLO -- rank: 601
... suppression or omission . . . is declared to be an unlawful practice." N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 (emphasis added). "Any person who suffers any ascertainable loss of ...
docket: a0653-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44620
75 MS SERVICES, LLC, v. PASQUALE CALABRIA -- rank: 599
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] 'In light of the CFA's remedial purpose, courts liberally ... or an unconscionable practice by BOTW that was prohibited under N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, dismissal for failure to state a claim was warranted. Calabria ...
docket: a3703-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-02-26
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41788
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!