Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 56:8-2")   76 to 90 of 370 results. Run time: 0.858 seconds | Search time: 0.851 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
76 MARIA STOECKER v. MARIO F. ECHEVARRIA -- rank: 599
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In addition, the CFA provides that: [t]o accomplish the ...
docket: a1452-07
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-04
status: published
citation: 408 N.J.Super. 597 975 A.2d 975
Document Size: 67330
77 FREDRIC J. GROSS, et al. v. TJH AUTOMOTIVE CO., L.L.C. -- rank: 599
... motor vehicle "messenger service" charge is "unconscionable" in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Plaintiff further contends that "defendants' expert report was inadmissible and ... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] As already noted, the CFA is remedial legislation which should ...
docket: a5630-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-09-09
status: published
citation: 380 N.J. Super. 176
Document Size: 78248
78 PATRICIA C. MYSKA v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 599
... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Further, "[t]he Legislature included 'services' within the definition of ...
docket: a4398-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-08
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 92375
79 PATRICIA C. MYSKA -- rank: 599
... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Further, "[t]he Legislature included 'services' within the definition of ...
docket: a0275-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-08
status: published
citation: 440 N.J.Super. 458 114 A.3d 761
Document Size: 92496
80 MARIA STOECKER v. MARIO F. ECHEVARRIA -- rank: 599
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice[.] [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] In addition, the CFA provides that: [t]o accomplish the ...
docket: a1975-07
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-08-04
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 67267
81 Hilda Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc. -- rank: 599
... person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] “Merchandise” includes “any objects, wares, goods, commodities, services or anything ... be applied in conjunction with other statutes or common law, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.13 provides: The rights, remedies and prohibitions accorded by the ...
docket: a-124-04
court: njsupreme
decided: 2006-03-15
status:
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 104598
82 BAYSIDE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH JEEP EAGLE, INC. v. ELIZABETH MA & DAVID MA -- rank: 599
... the "knowing concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact", N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, "whether or not the merchant acts in bad faith." Furst ... Super. 11 , 29 (App. Div. 1985). An "unconscionable commercial practice", N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, "is an amorphous concept obviously designed to establish a broad ...
docket: a3575-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-05-26
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 91206
83 CHRISTA ROBEY v. SPARC GROUP LLC, -- rank: 599
... Consumer Fraud Act, we note the broad concepts embodied in N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, which prohibits the use of 'unconscionable or abusive' commercial practices ...
docket: a1384-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-02-09
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 36065
84 THE ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ELITE RESTORATION, INC. -- rank: 597
... CFA was enacted to protect consumers from unconscionable commercial practices. N.J.S.A. 56:8-2; see Finderne Mgmt. Co. v Barrett, 402 N.J. Super ...
docket: atl-l-1903-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-02-14
status:
citation:
Document Size: 43572
85 BRITTANY McHUGH AND CINDY OZIEGBE VS. CARLOS ORTIZ AND ORTIZ TRANSMISSIONS, LLC -- rank: 597
... establish unlawful conduct as defined by the CFA' pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-2. Recognizing viable CFA claims allege '(1) unlawful conduct . . .; (2) an ...
docket: a3242-22
court: appellate
decided: 2024-05-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23447
86 ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY SERVICES, INC., et al. v. BEATRICE TROUP et al. -- rank: 597
... court erred in dismissing their consumer fraud claims against defendants.      N.J.S.A. 56:8-2 prohibits:         The act, use or employment by any person of ...
docket: a3410-00
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-07-25
status: published
citation: 343 N.J. Super. 254
Document Size: 56775
87 JOEL H. MOSKOW v. K. HOVNANIAN AT JACKSON, LLC -- rank: 597
... the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate. [ N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] Courts have also divided the unlawful conduct of CFA claims ...
docket: a6114-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-08-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53483
88 AKIA LESTER v. RAYMOND ZOLA -- rank: 597
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] As used in the statute, '[t]he term 'merchandise' shall ... statutory prohibition on deceptive practices in the sale of merchandise, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, and of N.J.A.C. 13:45A-26C.2 ...
docket: a2595-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36807
89 GILLIAN L. SHARP v. SEARS HOME APPLIANCE SHOWROOM, LLC -- rank: 595
... or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. [N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.] An 'unlawful practice' in violation of the CFA may arise ... is an omission pursuant to 8 A-1962-16T 1 N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.' Id. at 51 (citations omitted). Furthermore, a plaintiff asserting a ...
docket: a1962-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-06-21
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53633
90 TRACEY T. WILSON v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY -- rank: 595
... v. Merck & Co. , 192 N.J. 372, 389 (2007) (quoting N.J.S.A. 56:8-2). In order to establish a claim under the CFA, the ... prove that the defendant was engaged in some fraudulent action, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2, the Wilsons' failure to present any evidence of Deutsche Bank ...
docket: a3327-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37759
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 25 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!