Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 KERRY FLETCHER v. CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE -- rank: 573

... a public entity liable for the misdeeds of an employee, N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, and falls outside the scope of the TCA, thereby rendering ...

docket:	a0385-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-10-27
status:
citation:
Document Size:	72619

32 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3707-20.opn.html -- rank: 568

... of its employees pursuant to the Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. The TCA 'reestablished the rule of immunity for public entities ... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct.' N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. The TCA additionally provides '[n]othing in [the TCA] shall ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18938

33 SANFORD THIGPEN v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE -- rank: 563

... for the conduct of Price and Garvin in light of N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, which provides that "[a] public entity is not liable for ...

docket:	a0456-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-07-29
status:	published
citation:	408 N.J. Super. 331 974 A.2d 1126
Document Size:	71626

34 FIELDER V. STONACK -- rank: 551

... willful misconduct, the Township is not liable for his actions. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. If, however, his conduct does not rise to the level ...

docket:	a-115-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-06
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 101
Document Size:	85979

35 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2940-18.opn.html -- rank: 551

... State and the prosecutor's office for negligent supervision under N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, as that statute provides that public entities are not liable ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	27263

36 GINAMARIE GOMES v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH -- rank: 538

... intentional tort against the County as a public entity because N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 directs that public entities are not vicariously liable for acts ...

docket:	a1679-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-14
status:	published
citation:	444 N.J.Super. 479 134 A.3d 33
Document Size:	48388

37 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4286-16.opn.html -- rank: 535

... constituting a crime, actual fraud, actual malice, or willful misconduct.' N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Thus, the only basis for establishing an employee's liability ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	33075

38 OMER JACKSON, ET AL. VS. COUNTY OF HUDSON, ET AL. -- rank: 528

... injuries caused by an employee's actions constituting willful misconduct. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Read together, these provisions result in no liability for the ...

docket:	a3111-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18475

39 KEVIN KELLY v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, -- rank: 515

... Board of Chosen Freeholders could not be held liable because N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 immunizes public entities from suits based upon the willful acts ... compelled by the very terms of the Tort Claims Act. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 declares that a public entity cannot be held liable -- and ...

docket:	a4178-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-12
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 552
Document Size:	55581

40 GARY N. MCABEE, D.O v. THE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 512

... no liability for any alleged intentional conduct of its employees. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Accordingly, the summary judgment dismissal in favor of UMDNJ must ...

docket:	a5771-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43485

41 RICHARD D. DAYTON v. EDWARD SIMPSON -- rank: 494

... if it is established that his conduct . . . constituted . . . willful misconduct." N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 provides that "[a] public entity is not liable for the ...

docket:	a5157-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	49315

42 ROOSTER BAR LLC. v. BOROUGH OF CLIFFSIDE PARK -- rank: 492

... as plaintiffs contend, the public entities are immune from liability. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. The final two wrongful acts that Harout alleged in his ...

docket:	a1022-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28161

43 CITY OF CAMDEN, et al. v. RYSHAONE H. THOMAS -- rank: 474

... We find this contention to be without merit. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, "[a] public entity is not liable for the acts or ...

docket:	A2356-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51506

44 LINDA REIS, et al. v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY -- rank: 474

... We find this contention to be without merit. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, "[a] public entity is not liable for the acts or ...

docket:	A1418-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51515

45 FRANK AMOS v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 474

... THAT PLAINTIFF'S INJURIES DID NOT MEET THE THRESHOLD OF N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 AS IT IS CLEAR THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S PROOFS ESTABLISHED ... PLAINTIFF, THE COURT'S FAILURE TO CHARGE THE JURY ON N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 CONSTITUTED A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE. P O INT IX THE ... City's arguments respecting its lack of vicarious liability under N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, for willful misconduct by Officer Suero. The jury interrogatories in ...

docket:	a4449-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-07-20
status:
citation:
Document Size:	65130