Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 HEIDI DELANE, et al. v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, et al. -- rank: 464

... that the City would be immune from liability pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-10.     We also conclude that plaintiff's other contention on cross ...

docket:	A1407-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-07-24
status:	published
citation:	343 N.J. Super. 225
Document Size:	35399

47 ANTHONY McCORMICK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 456

... excluding independent contractors from the definition of a public employee); N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 (disallowing vicarious liability where the public employee's actions or ...

docket:	a3493-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	published
citation:	446 N.J.Super. 603 144 A.3d 1260
Document Size:	41235

48 ABRAHAM SMITH v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, et al. -- rank: 397

... a claim would be barred by the Tort claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, which provides that a public employer is not liable for ...

docket:	A0661-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-04-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26374

49 MICHAEL LAPP, et al. v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al. -- rank: 395

... against the employee personally, but not from the public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. The term "willful misconduct" is "'not immutably defined but takes ...

docket:	a5938-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-12
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	120969

50 HELEN GAZZILLO v. ROBERT GRIEB -- rank: 357

... indemnification by the public entity would seem uncertain at best. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10 ("A public entity is not liable for the acts or ...

docket:	a4346-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-03-05
status:	published
citation:	398 N.J.Super. 259
Document Size:	36528

51 SEAL TITE CORPORATION VS KENNETH BRESSI, ET AL -- rank: 341

... N.J.S.A. 59:2-3 and particularly by N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. Under the latter section, a public entity is not liable ...

docket:	a6019-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-06-19
status:	published
citation:	312 N.J.Super. 532
Document Size:	20482

52 A-0LENNOX A. CHUNKOO v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT P.O. R. MACIERA and SGT. CELSO VELEZ and P.O. KYLE W. FERREIRA SGT THOMAS ROE, DET. JOSUE DURAN CAPT. YABLONSKY, SGT M MILTON, LT. J. ALBERTO LT. J MINTZ, SGT. HILL, DET M MUHAMMAD, DET HENDERS -- rank: 331

... City's argument that it was absolutely immune pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-10, notwithstanding that the officers' "pursuit immunity" under N.J.S ...

docket:	a2676-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17558

53 TYLER BENNETT, DONNA et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, FREEHOLD REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. -- rank: 260

... threshold for medical bills and objective evidence of permanent injury. N.J.S.A. 59:2-10. We reject this contention. Even viewed in the light most ...

docket:	A3240-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40340