Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

211 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3024-10a3619-10.opn.html -- rank: 554

... of action to file a claim against a public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). As an exception to this rule, N.J.S ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29406

212 CHRISTOPHER SILVER v. YUNLU WANG -- rank: 552

... of right followed. See R. 2:2-3(a)(3). N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires that claims for damages against public entities must be ... the statutorily mandated claim form within the time provided by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, the alleged lack of prejudice to the State and North ...

docket:	a5268-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33299

213 JAMES PRUDENCIANO v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH -- rank: 552

... motion to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (TCA). We affirm ... his claim within ninety days of accrual as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Plaintiff opposed dismissal and cross- moved for permission to file ... ninety days of the date the cause of action accrued. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. If timely notice is not provided, a litigant may pursue ... Cleaners, Inc., 230 N.J. 123, 133 (2017); see also N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). Medical conditions may meet the extraordinary circumstances standard if ...

docket:	a1452-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18040

214 DANIEL SHONTZ v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY -- rank: 550

... accrual of a cause of action to a public entity. [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires a person asserting a claim against a public employee ... subject to the ninety-day notice requirement under the TCA, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Here, plaintiff's tortious interference claims can be separated into ...

docket:	A2711-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48455

215 ROBERT DIMATTIES, JR v. SOMERDALE PARK SCHOOL -- rank: 550

... a basis to deny plaintiff his day in court. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 (providing that when a child suffers an injury, an action ... eighteenth birthday); Margolis & Novack, Claims Against Public Entities , comment on N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 (2010). We emphasize the limits of our decision. In reversing ...

docket:	a3769-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46496

216 PEGGY ANNE REINHARDT v. BEATRIS ORTIZ -- rank: 548

... the accrual of her cause of action as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 as a precursor to suit, and that she had failed ... notice provided by Reinhardt was inadequate to preserve her claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires that notice of a tort claim be presented as ...

docket:	a1437-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25365

217 EILEEN MARTINEZ v. CITY OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 548

... of tort claim filed by plaintiff Eileen Martinez sufficient under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 of the Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A ... claim within ninety days after the cause of action accrued. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 to -9. Plaintiff contended her March 20, 2018 message to ...

docket:	a3692-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20180

218 MARY GRIFFITH v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -- rank: 548

... ninety days after   the accrual of a cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The notice requirement is intended to "'expedite [an] investigation with ... file a notice of claim, the claim is "forever barred." N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. A notice of claim may be filed beyond the ninety ...

docket:	a1285-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23916

219 JOHN ROGERS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER -- rank: 548

... s] procedure[s.]" N.J.S.A. 59:8-3. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 provides, in pertinent part, that A claim relating to a ... years from the time of the accrual of the claim[,]" N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(b)[,] was barred. Affirmed. This archive is a service of ...

docket:	a0630-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18887

220 State-v-Ayton -- rank: 545

... than ninety days following the incident that precipitated the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. That time period may be extended by the Superior Court ...

docket:	1904-BT-035828
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	2011-09-13
status:
citation:	427 N.J.Super. 493 48 A.3d 1213
Document Size:	21073

221 MARCO NEAD v. UNION COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES COMMISSION -- rank: 545

... with the notice requirements of the Tort Claims Act. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. 3 We note that Rule 1:7-4 —â ...

docket:	a3149-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	76623

222 SHARON HARDY v. THERESA WRIGHT-JOHNSON -- rank: 543

... to support an estoppel under the circumstances. This appeal followed. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires that claims for damages against public entities must be ...

docket:	a2797-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15052

223 Caviglia v. Royal Tours of America -- rank: 543

... days of the accrual date of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The failure to do so may result in dismissal of ...

docket:	a-72-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-02-19
status:
citation:	178 N.J. 460
Document Size:	73987

224 LaFage v. Jani, M.D. -- rank: 543

... S.A. 34:15-51, and the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, that specifically authorize a representative to bring an action on ...

docket:	a-65-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-02-22
status:
citation:	166 N.J. 412
Document Size:	144285

225 DOROTHY CORLISS and VERNON CORLISS, husband et al. v. et al. -- rank: 543

... the claim within ninety days of its accrual, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, and had failed to move for leave to file late ...

docket:	A0245-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42499