Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

271 R.B., Sr. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 489

... of which plaintiff complains was filed on January 11, 2011. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires that claims for damages against public entities must be ...

docket:	a4272-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10820

272 GARY R. JETER v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 489

... public entity within ninety days of accrual of the injury. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. If the notice requirements are not substantially met, the claim ...

docket:	a0455-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	74955

273 JUDY SMITH v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 489

... served a notice of tort claim on the City. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. 1 However, she did not serve a notice of tort ... either serve a notice on the Authority within ninety days, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, or file a motion within one year for leave to ...

docket:	a2447-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30809

274 BETTY J. FORD-WHITE v. WALTER F. LANDGRAF -- rank: 487

... notice of those claims within ninety days of their accrual, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. He found that those claims accrued on September 3, 2008 ... send a notice of claim until February 19, 2009. Cf. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 (requiring the notice of claim to be filed before the ...

docket:	a0685-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12882

275 NICOLE DAWSON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES -- rank: 487

... notice of claim and filing of complaint, as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. 3 Because plaintiff's claim may be interpreted as one ...

docket:	a3292-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44957

276 NABIL ABDELKADER v. BERGEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOCIATION -- rank: 485

... ninety days after the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. This section permits relaxation of the ninety-day limitation "provided ...

docket:	a5368-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14697

277 LINDA C. & THOMAS LOWE VS FARAMARZ C. ZARGHAMI, M.D., ET AL -- rank: 485

... notice of plaintiff's cause of action as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (the Act), N ... notice of claim on UMDNJ, as required by the Act. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Plaintiff countered with the contention, among other arguments, that defendant ...

docket:	a3809-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-10-27
status:	published
citation:	305 N.J.Super. 90
Document Size:	19010

278 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 COURT A-0 STEVEN SCOTT v -- rank: 483

... with the notice requirements of the Tort Claims Act ("TCA"), N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The trial court adopted this argument and consequently dismissed all ... on the City within the ninety-day period mandated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Nor did plaintiff move within the maximum one-year period ... recovery on the tort claims as a matter of law. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). A different conclusion pertains to statutory causes of action ...

docket:	a3356-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17490

279 Brian Scott Owens, Sr., et al. v. Gerald Feigin, M.D., et al. -- rank: 480

... the cause of action against a public entity or employee, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, unless the claimant demonstrates good cause to justify a late ...

docket:	a-43-07
court:
decided:	2008-06-03
status:
citation:	194 N.J. 607
Document Size:	43114

280 CAROL TORRE v. DCH INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. -- rank: 478

... public entity within ninety days of accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. A late claim may be filed within one year of ...

docket:	A3102-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71497

281 ALTORIE WHEELER v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 478

... of the accrual of the claim, subject to certain exceptions. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The court may permit a late filing of that notice ...

docket:	a0918-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25362

282 R.T. v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER -- rank: 478

... by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(b). Although that ruling "essentially end[ed] the inquiry" as ... two years have elapsed since the accrual of the claim." N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(b) (emphasis added). This statutory limitations period is reaffirmed in ...

docket:	a0467-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27095

283 D.N. and J.N v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH and FAMILY SERVICES -- rank: 478

... brought within ninety days after the accrual of an action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). In the notices of claim plaintiffs sought to file ...

docket:	a4147-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18632

284 MARTHA GREENBLATT v. BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD -- rank: 474

... the six-month waiting period had been exhausted, contrary to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. On September 14, 2012, the court dismissed the First Complaint ...

docket:	a4227-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26106

285 ANGELO S. MALLOZZI v. CONNECTONE BANK -- rank: 474

... should result in an exception to the requirement imposed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 that litigants wait six months from the date a public ... plaintiffs filed their complaint seeking damages against the Sheriff prematurely. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires a tort claimant to file a notice of claim ... waiting period should not apply here. We agree in part. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 only applies to tort claims, and it did not preclude ...

docket:	a1493-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27820