Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

331 DOVER DAVIS v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 409

... the ninetieth day after accrual of the cause of action," N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, and claimants are "forever barred from recovering against a public ...

docket:	a4901-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22108

332 SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 409

... with a Tort Claims Act notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8- -8 in May 2016 was denied. A-0618-16T2 2 On ...

docket:	a0618-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-06-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11175

333 JENNIE ROSARIO, an individual v. DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES -- rank: 404

... within ninety days of accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. A person may be permitted to file a late notice ...

docket:	a3945-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32095

334 JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. TOWNSHIP OF PHILLIPSBURG -- rank: 404

... tort claims notice within the ninety-day period mandated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The trial court deemed untimely the notice plaintiff mailed on ... the lawsuit for non-compliance with the notice provision of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The judge granted the motion, rejecting plaintiff's claim that ...

docket:	a1652-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	8910

335 FREDERICK WATERS V. TWP OF GALLOWAY -- rank: 402

... claim was ever filed pursuant to the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, that Act could not serve as a basis for any ...

docket:	a1244-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1995-12-27
status:	published published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 222
Document Size:	49766

336 IN THE MATTER OF A SEARCH WARRANT FOR 33 LOCKWOOD AVENUE, FREEHOLD, NJ -- rank: 402

... the notice provisions governing claims against public entities contained in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Appellants seek to include, in a future civil complaint for ... contemplated civil action or to satisfy the notice requirement of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. These documents would only contain information proffered by the applicant ...

docket:	A2516-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-12-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68248

337 MAGALYS GARRIGA v. ROWAN UNIVERSITY -- rank: 402

... ninety days after accrual of the cause o f action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. If past the deadline, a claimant may file a late ...

docket:	a1353-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12496

338 JEFFREY S. WILLIAMS JR v. TINTON FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT TINTON FALLS POLICE OFFICER JAMES SAPIA TINTON FALLS CORPORAL BLAKE RUTHERFORD MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE DETECTIVE KEITH FINKELSTEIN and BOROUGH OF T -- rank: 400

... extraordinary circumstances to excuse the late filing. This appeal ensued. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires that claims for damages against public entities must be ...

docket:	a1521-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16304

339 MONIQUE CARROWAY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN -- rank: 400

... claim except as otherwise provided in section 59:8-9[.] [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-8.] After expiration of the ninety-day period, a plaintiff may ...

docket:	a6148-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25471

340 DOMENICK MALINCONICO v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 398

... we see no basis for granting relief here. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, a notice of claim must be presented "not later than ...

docket:	a2316-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	14759

341 MAHESH SWAMINATHAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL -- rank: 398

... ninety days of the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. However, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 alleviates the ...

docket:	a5582-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-23
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16850

342 CAROLYN MCKINNON-POWELL v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 398

... the expiration of the two-year limitations period contained in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. A different judge denied NHA’s motion to dismiss, finding ... commenced within two years of the accrual of the action, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, it is enough in such circumstances that a plaintiff have ...

docket:	a3893-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-10-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24673

343 EDWIN LORENZO v. SERGEANT E. MOORE, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF, et al. -- rank: 395

... required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-3 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff produced documentation establishing that ...

docket:	a3621-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-05-25
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	35205

344 BRIAN SCOTT OWENS, SR., et al. v. GERALD FEIGIN, M.D. -- rank: 395

... filed well beyond the ninety days allowed by the statute. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Further, plaintiffs never moved within the time allowed to file ...

docket:	A1074-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-06-21
status:	published
citation:	394 N.J. Super. 85 925 A.2d 106
Document Size:	62043

345 JUDITH G. RAMOS-LOPEZ v. LUIS A. VARGAS -- rank: 387

... for the service of a tort-claim notice imposed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Last month, in again considering the consequence of attorney inattention ...

docket:	a3530-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8438