Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.M. -- rank: 611

... without Father's consent or a successful removal application under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and Baures v. Lewis , 167 N.J. 91 , 116-17 ... then she may also apply to remove the children under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and Baures , supra , 167 N.J. at 116-17. This ...

docket:	a1391-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31978

32 KATHRYN OWEN v. LAURENCE GERARD MURPHY, III -- rank: 609

... parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise order. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-2.] In Cooper v. Cooper , 99 N.J. 42 (1984), the Court stated that the purpose underlying N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 is to preserve the rights of the noncustodial parent and ... jurisdiction by the custodial parent: When removal is challenged under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, we hold that to establish sufficient cause for the removal ... Id. at 56.] The Court next addressed the application of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 in Holder v. Polanski , 111 N.J. 344 (1988). This ...

docket:	A1135-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56406

33 K.R. VS. J.L.R. -- rank: 600

... lived with up until now are all moving to Florida. N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 requires a parent seeking to relocate a child from New ... parent to demonstrate 'cause' for the relocation. The intent of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 is 'to preserve the rights of the noncustodial parent and ... its seminal opinion in Bisbing, the Court interpreted 'cause' under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 as requiring the petitioning parent to satisfy the 'the best ...

docket:	a3786-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-05-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17167

34 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/bg-v-lh.opn.html -- rank: 598

... object to the removal of the children from the jurisdiction, N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, in exchange 22 for [the mother's] agreement that New ...

docket:	BG-v-LH
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size:	64201

35 J.M v. J.R -- rank: 589

... right to visitation. 'From that perspective, the 'cause' requirement of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 implicates the best interests of the child as manifested through ...

docket:	a2953-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28213

36 J.M v. J.R -- rank: 582

... right to visitation. From that perspective, the 'cause' requirement of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 impli­cates the best interests of the child as manifested ...

docket:	a4463-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25530

37 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. G.M., M.M. -- rank: 580

... the usual context in which such applications are routinely generated. N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. Nevertheless, the concerns that removal applications engender apply in this ...

docket:	A2173-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-23
status:	published
citation:	398 N.J.Super. 21
Document Size:	92565

38 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. L.W and S.W. and R.C IN THE MATTER OF K.W Minor- -- rank: 578

... order based upon its authority to do so pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, which governs the "[c]ustody of children of divorced or ...

docket:	a0897-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61029

39 AARON FENZI v. JACQUELINE BALLAN -- rank: 572

... analyze "cause" for the child's removal as required by N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and that, even if the court had conducted a relocation ... applicable to the removal of a child as governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. Since this appeal was argued, the Supreme Court decided Bisbing ... analysis to be applied "to all interstate relocation disputes under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 in which the parents share legal custody." Id. at 3 ... the trial court should decide whether there is "cause" under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 to authorize a child's relocation out of state by ... best interests standard applies to the determination of 'cause' under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2." Id. at 40. Thus, if this were purely a relocation ...

docket:	a4690-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15223

40 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0604-19.opn.html -- rank: 569

... their then four-year-old son within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. We affirm. We glean these facts from the record. The ... without his consent. The judge then recited the provisions of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, governing parents' removal of children from New Jersey, and prescribing ... the judge concluded that plaintiff 'consented within the meaning of [N.J.S.A. 9:2-2]' to defendant relocating with their son to Pennsylvania. Thus, according ... modifications of custody based on permanent relocation is 'governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-2,' requiring plaintiff to 'demonstrate that there is 'cause' for an ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18079

41 JAIME TAORMINA BISBING v. GLENN R. BISBING, III, -- rank: 567

... a best interest analysis is required to determine cause under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 to authorize moving a child out of state, by weighing ...

docket:	a0138-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-07
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	32419

42 ENGY ABDELKADER v. AHMED ISLAME HOSNY -- rank: 563

... the MSA did not depart from the general requirements of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, and forbade either parent from moving with Alec outside New ... the trial court should decide whether there is 'cause' under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 to authorize a child's relocation out of state by ...

docket:	a1666-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16951

43 N.S v. S.S -- rank: 563

... children from the State of New Jersey is governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, which provides: When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the ... upon cause shown, shall otherwise order. "The clear purpose of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 is to preserve the rights of the [non-custodial] parent ...

docket:	a2446-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35541

44 N.S v. S.S -- rank: 563

... children from the State of New Jersey is governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, which provides: When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the ... upon cause shown, shall otherwise order. "The clear purpose of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 is to preserve the rights of the [non-custodial] parent ...

docket:	a2043-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35540

45 B.G v. E.G -- rank: 561

... the best interest standard applies in reviewing an application under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 by a custodial parent to remove a minor child to ... 16T1 (2017). Relocation within the State is not subject to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. Schulze v. Morris, 361 N.J. Super. 419, 426 (2003 ...

docket:	a0830-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63580