Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

46 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.M. -- rank: 561

... to the trial court for further proceedings, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, to address L.C.'s removal of A.C. to ... state without the consent of the non-custodial parent under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. In response, the Division argues that N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 does not apply under the facts presented here because T ... and parents, for example, remain obligated to pay child support, N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 provides: When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody ... father acknowledged paternity and noted that "[t]he provisions of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 are definitive legislative expressions of the public policy of the ...

docket:	A3791-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-18
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	44003

47 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 DANIELLE DELORENZO-TAGLIA n -- rank: 558

... to remain in New Jersey. This argument is without merit. N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 provides as follows, in pertinent part: When the Superior Court ...

docket:	a2353-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39184

48 J.P. v. L.P. -- rank: 558

... 546, 565 (App. Div. 2017). A-1553-18T3 2 Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, a parent who seeks to remove a child from this ...

docket:	a1553-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16965

49 SAMUEL E CARMON, JR v. DONNA J CARMON -- rank: 558

... relocate children domiciled in this State to another state. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. The initial question to be resolved on a removal application ...

docket:	a5046-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39835

50 MCKINLEY v. NATERS -- rank: 556

... to formulate opinions based on more than speculation. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, when the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody of ... every reasonable analysis of statutory law and case law including N.J.S.A . 9:2-2, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, Baures, O’Connor ... in any fashion offend the anti-removal policy considerations of N.J.S.A . 9:2-2. Indeed, the term “removal” in N.J.S.A . 9:2-2 does not prohibit temporary departures from the jurisdiction for legitimate ...

docket:	mckinley-v-naters
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	2010-06-25
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19203

51 JOHN DAVID WILLIAMS v. ROSINA GRAVANO WILLIAMS -- rank: 556

... for the last, we reject defendant's contentions. I. Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, a child cannot be removed from the State without consent ...

docket:	a0754-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	69467

52 QUINETTA YOUNG v. WILLIE LEE -- rank: 550

... and removal from New Jersey to have been wholly inappropriate. N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 does not permit the removal of a child who is ...

docket:	a5283-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	54479

53 PATRICIA ANN CATHRALL, v. EUGENE H. CATHRALL, IV -- rank: 550

... POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ITS APPLICATION OF N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 TO PLAINTIFF'S REMOVAL APPLICATION, BECAUSE THE MINOR CHILDREN WERE ... age" to signify their consent, their relocation was required under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. By its terms, that statute prohibits removal of children of ...

docket:	a4085-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-18
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	59169

54 SANDRA HAMMOND v. JEREL HAMMOND -- rank: 548

... was required to authorize their relocation to another state. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. The statute is intended to preserve the post-divorce relationship ...

docket:	a4791-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31826

55 ALEJANDRO MENDOZA v. SI-NAE SHIM -- rank: 543

... the motion judge committed reversible error or misapplied the law. N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 states a parent who seeks to remove a child from ... demonstrate 'cause' for the removal. As we recently stated, 'under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, ''cause' should be determined by a best interests analysis in ...

docket:	a0917-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25977

56 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.V. -- rank: 532

... 9:6-8.50 and a Baures 4 hearing under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. Having reviewed Gary's arguments in light of the record ...

docket:	a2095-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51273

57 VERONICA GUZMAN v. AGUSTIN ARCE, JR -- rank: 532

... on October 24, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 seeking leave to relocate to Jacksonville, Florida, with her parents ... right to visitation. 'From that perspective, the "cause" requirement of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 impli�cates the best interests of the child as manifested ...

docket:	a3597-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-02-20
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	65140

58 ANDREW LEVINE VS ROSEMARY LEVINE BACON -- rank: 524

... Jessica to Florida. The determination of that issue begins with N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, which provides: ������������When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the ... a child from this state: ������������When removal is challenged under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, we hold that to establish sufficient cause for the removal ...

docket:	a2604-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-02-06
status:	published
citation:	297 N.J.Super. 224
Document Size:	84110

59 JOSHUA SCHWAGER v. CHANA AHUVA SCHWAGER -- rank: 521

... remove children domiciled in this State to another state. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. The initial question to be resolved on a removal application ...

docket:	a6042-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53476

60 ZORAN MUDRINIC v. TAMARA MUDRINIC -- rank: 510

... appeal, plaintiff raises a single issue — the judge violated N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 as well as N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 ...

docket:	a3639-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25426