Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. B.M. -- rank: 592

... an FM docket, FD docket" the judge considered whether, under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and Baures v. Lewis , 167 N.J. 91 (2001), "custody ... time. In making its determination, the family court analyzed the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 best-interests factors. In G.M. , supra , we recognized that ... best-interests analysis that employed the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, which is commonly used in a variety of family matters ...

docket:	a1869-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	66155

137 TUHIN PANDYA v. ROOPAL SHAH -- rank: 592

... the trial judge reviewed the fourteen factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 to determine what was in the best interest of A ... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).' Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] When 'the parents cannot agree to a custody arrangement ... custody plan which the court shall consider in awarding custody.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(e). Lastly, when making 'any custody arrangement not agreed to ... place on the record the factors which justify' its order. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). '[T]he decision concerning the type of custody arrangement ... determinations, the hearing judge considered each factor set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The judge referenced the extensive record which provided ...

docket:	a4546-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28871

138 T.O v. J.P -- rank: 592

... trial court's findings and argues that the court misapplied N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in making the custody award. We disagree and affirm ... S.C., analyzed the child custody factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). See Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102 ... s findings, and further argues that the trial judge misapplied N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[I]t is a well-settled principle that our ... A court should consider several factors in determining custody arrangements. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[U]nder a joint custody arrangement[,] legal custody â ... determine to be in the best interests of the child.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We review A-4208-18 7 the Family Part ... conclude that the trial judge erred in his application of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We find no merit in the appeal as ...

docket:	a4208-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16286

139 J.M v. J.R -- rank: 592

... remand judge to "fully consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, as well as applicable case law, in determining what custody ... 200 , 215-28 (holding that visitation is presumptive subject to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 considerations), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 926 , 121 S. Ct ...

docket:	a4463-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25530

140 MICHAEL P. HRYCAK v. RITA HRYCAK -- rank: 592

... his analysis, the judge carefully tracked the statutory factors of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The following excerpts from the judge's custody ruling capture ... has elaborated upon this best-interest standard by prescribing in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) thirteen non-exclusive factors to be considered by the ... Div.), certif. denied , 142 N.J. 571 (1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). We are unpersuaded ...

docket:	a1321-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	84428

141 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2106-18.opn.html -- rank: 592

... judge never addressed the statutory best interests' factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 prior to modifying the DSA, and the judge exerted duress ... ied] any custody arrangement not agreed to by both parents.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; see also Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	62397

142 MICHAEL P. HRYCAK v. RITA HRYCAK -- rank: 592

... his analysis, the judge carefully tracked the statutory factors of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The following excerpts from the judge's custody ruling capture ... has elaborated upon this best-interest standard by prescribing in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) thirteen non-exclusive factors to be considered by the ... Div.), certif. denied , 142 N.J. 571 (1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). We are unpersuaded ...

docket:	a3645-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-01
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	82689

143 KIMBERLY LANZANA v. STEPHAN DEBELLE DUPLAN -- rank: 589

... rights to share in the parenting of the child. Cf. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (noting that parents have equal rights to custody of child ... 272 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 75 N.J. 28 (1977); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Just as fear or resistance would have tended to support ...

docket:	a2183-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	75958

144 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3010-19.opn.html -- rank: 589

... pursuant to court order, and the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 before he entered the emergent order. 4 The evidence the ... ability to agree, communicate, or cooperate in these [custody] 4 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 provides: In making an award of custody, the court shall ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	52357

145 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.T and C.C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF AM.T., J.T and AL.T Minors -- rank: 589

... without a "best interests" hearing. See i bid. ; see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (setting forth factors the court must consider in making child ...

docket:	a4982-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	93164

146 N.D v. M.D. -- rank: 587

... After considering all of the relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded defendant sole legal custody of the children ...

docket:	a5748-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37988

147 N.D v. M.D. -- rank: 587

... After considering all of the relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded defendant sole legal custody of the children ...

docket:	a6022-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37988

148 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.V. -- rank: 585

... an FN action agree to a judicial custody determination under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, they may not later protest the procedures followed). The record ...

docket:	a2095-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51273

149 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2058-18.opn.html -- rank: 585

... dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4,8 unless the Title Thirty action involves an out-of ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	54188

150 T.N.T. v. A.R.G. -- rank: 585

... New Jersey courts should apply the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, thereby effectuating the legislative intent. Terry , supra , 270 N.J ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [ N.J.S.A.  9:2-4(c).] As a general proposition, a trial court's obligation ... we have no doubt that he considered and applied the N.J.S.A.  9:2-4(c) factors in awarding sole custody. The court expressly stated ...

docket:	a2804-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28804