Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:2-4")   166 to 180 of 407 results. Run time: 0.713 seconds | Search time: 0.710 seconds    
 Page:1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 28 Previous 15 Next 15
166 JAIME TAORMINA BISBING v. GLENN R. BISBING, III, -- rank: 573
... time, usually three to five years. A-0138-20 2 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and other relevant considerations. We need only repeat what is ...
docket: a0138-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-07-07
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 32419
167 STEPHANIE MESSNER v. MIKLOS HAJDU-NEMETH -- rank: 573
... determining custody in accordance with the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 (2017). The ... to properly apply the child custody factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Plaintiff argues that defendant was violating a court order and ... judge did not properly apply each custody factor pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, but instead only 'read through' them, is also clearly contradicted ...
docket: a5607-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27274
168 COLLEEN KNIGHT v. CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT -- rank: 570
... With New Jersey Court [ Rule ] 1:7-4(a) And [ N.J.S.A. ] 9:2-4(f) 2. The Factual Findings And Legal Conclusions Of The ... With New Jersey Court [ Rule ] 1:7-4(a) And [ N.J.S.A. ] 9:2-4(f) 2. The Factual Findings And Legal Conclusions Of The ... legal conclusions of law. See R. 1:7-4(a); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). We disagree. Defendant bore the burden to prove changed ...
docket: a6239-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-05-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18399
169 RODRICK L. HAMPTON v. JENNIFER P. CASSESE -- rank: 568
... Beck , supra , 86 N.J. at 486-87. See also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a)(2) (listing consultation between the parents with joint custody ... plaintiff; yet legally he has every right to receive them. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a)(2). Plaintiff also certified the Mother's Day dispute ... best left solely to the residential parent's discretion. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a). Many variables impact such an evaluation, including a parent ...
docket: a5548-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51002
170 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.M and Z.F IN THE MATTER OF X.F S.J AND Z.M -- rank: 568
... the issue here were simply the issue of custody under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 with the best interest[s] of the child standard [to ...
docket: a2703-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2010-11-19
status:
citation:
Document Size: 33897
171 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0503-20.opn.html -- rank: 565
... defendant's cross-motion for custody. The court discussed each N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 factor then concluded with: So, I have three of the ... appeal, plaintiff argues the court misapplied the relocation factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and erred in not interviewing the child. We agree. Our ... should apply the best interests analysis to determine 'cause' under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in all relocation disputes where parents share legal custody. Bisbing, 230 N.J. at 335. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) provides the statutory factors for a best interests analysis ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 33534
172 C.O v. K.G and U.O -- rank: 565
... determining custody in accordance with the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 (2017) (citing ... J. 480, 496 n.8 (1981)). A-0181-20 8 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) sets out the statutory factors for a best interests ... unresolved factual issues and no application or analysis of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors. Moreover, the record is barren of any discussion ...
docket: a0181-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-04-13
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26053
173 L.N. AND C.N. VS. B.R. -- rank: 565
... A-1141-23 11 conduct a best interests analysis under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Watkins, 163 N.J. at 254. Stated differently, after ... V.C., 163 N.J. at 228. Thus, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the court may enter an order that: provides joint custody ...
docket: a1141-23
court: appellate
decided: 2024-07-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32017
174 J.A.D. v. M.A.I. -- rank: 563
... in analyzing the best interests of the child factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Defendant also asserts the trial court erred in ordering ... be presumed to be protected by the adversarial process.' Ibid. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) provides factors for a court to use in its ...
docket: a1179-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-05-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31439
175 TUHIN PANDYA v. ROOPAL SHAH -- rank: 563
... the trial judge reviewed the fourteen factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4 to determine what was in the best interest of A ...
docket: a0445-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25876
176 B.H.M. v. L.E.P.-M. -- rank: 563
... and parents share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Where parents disagree on custody and parenting time, the court ... the child, specifically, by considering the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in making a custody and parenting time award. The ...
docket: a1751-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61565
177 O.M. VS. R.T. AND E.T. -- rank: 563
... same factors they consider when evaluating child custody issues. See N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4(c). Those factors include: (1) 'the parents' ability to agree ... 23 8 gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)' (quoting Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102 ...
docket: a1924-23
court: appellate
decided: 2024-07-25
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16147
178 REBECCA JUSTICE v. PHILLIP MARINO -- rank: 563
... hearing argument from both parties, the court made findings under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and, based on the prior record, granted defendant's ... who entered the March 2019 order made adequate findings under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. A decision to vacate under Rule 4:50-1 lies ...
docket: a5520-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13681
179 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1493-20.opn.html -- rank: 561
... case under the best interests of the child standard in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. It found that defendant 'failed to demonstrate . . . there is a ... THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD STANDARD, SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, OUTWEIGHS DEFENDANT'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION. POINT ... A court should consider several factors in determining custody arrangements. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[U]nder a joint custody arrangement, legal custody â ... determine to be in the best interests of the child.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We review the Family Part judge's determination to ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 49810
180 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5362-17.opn.html -- rank: 561
... just.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, a court may enter an order establishing joint custody, sole ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 57668
 Page:1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 28 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!